Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07378553

Multiparametric Ultrafast Ultrasound Biomarkers for Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies

The purpose of this research study is to determine the potential of a multiparametric ultrasound approach to non-invasively monitor disease progression and to serve as an objective outcome measure for future clinical trials in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies.

The investigators will compare the muscles of ambulatory or non-ambulatory boys/men with Duchenne and Becker Dystrophies with muscles of healthy age-matched individuals of the same age and monitor disease progression in those with muscular dystrophies over a 12-month year period.

The ultrafast ultrasound technology used in this study allows the simultaneous assessment of muscle structure, mechanics and physiology, including stiffness, anisotropy, viscosity, intramuscular fat, muscle volume, and microvascular perfusion. The amount of muscle alteration measured will be related to performance in daily activities, such as walking and muscle strength, in order to identify sensitive and objective markers of disease progression.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies (DMD/BMD) are the most common forms of muscular dystrophies, progressive muscle wasting diseases leading to weakness and devastating functional impairment. DMD is characterized by predominant involvement in skeletal, including respiratory, and cardiac muscles. Diagnosis is usually established at three to four years of age. Patients typically show muscle degeneration that worsens with age, leading to wheelchair dependency usually by the age of ten, assisted ventilation before the age of twenty, and premature death in the second to fourth decade. BMD shows a similar clinical phenotype but a later onset (approximately twelve years of age), a slower disease progression, delayed or no loss of ambulation, and variable involvement of the cardiac and respiratory systems. Considerable heterogeneity has been observed within and across the DMD/BMD phenotypes, which makes the design and analysis of clinical trials and prediction of the disease progression challenging.

Recent inconsistent results in DMD clinical development programs have also raised questions about the validity of the methods used to evaluate treatment efficacy. The number of potentially effective therapeutic approaches for DMD/BMD has rapidly increased over recent years, and thus the demand for validated outcome measures to demonstrate clinically meaningful therapeutic response over time in clinical trials (e.g., one year) is higher than ever. Regulatory agencies (e.g., FDA) have explicitly been encouraging the development of imaging biomarkers that may serve as surrogate markers of how patients will respond to investigational treatments in DMD/BMD.

This study aims to validate the potential of innovative ultrasound imaging methods, developed by our research consortium over recent years, as imaging tools to monitor disease progression and serve as a surrogate outcome measure for clinical trials in muscular dystrophies. Using cutting-edge ultrasound imaging techniques, including shear wave elastography, matrix approach, 3D freehand ultrasound, and power Doppler we will quantify much needed surrogate measures of muscle damage and progressive degeneration such as intramuscular fat content, fibrosis, muscle apoptosis and structural disorganization, inflammation, hypertrophy/atrophy, and intramuscular blood flow, in the lower and upper extremity muscles. An easy-to-apply multiparametric approach will be developed to assess the most important hallmarks of muscle degeneration associated with the most common and devastating muscular dystrophies.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inclusion Criteria for patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Ambulatory and non-ambulatory males (ages 5-30 at baseline testing) previously diagnosed with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy based on absence of dystrophin expression.
  • Inclusion Criteria for patients with Becker Muscular Dystrophy: Ambulatory and non-ambulatory males (ages 5-60 at baseline testing) previously diagnosed with Becker Muscular Dystrophy based on genetically confirmed, reduced or dysfunctional dystrophin.
  • Inclusion Criteria for Aged-matched controls: Ambulatory males (ages 5-60 years) without disease or injury to the lower and/or upper extremities

Exclusion criteria

  • Exclusion Criteria for patients with Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies:

Inability to undergo static exam, missing measurement site (resection/amputation), neurocognitive impairment preventing informed consent

  • Exclusion Criteria for Age-matched controls: Any condition affecting muscle metabolism/function, neuromuscular disease, or injury to the lower and/or upper extremities in the past 5 years

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Baseline mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: Baseline

    Assessment of muscle stiffness (kPa) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  2. Baseline mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: Baseline

    Assessment of anisotropy (a.u.) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  3. Baseline mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: Baseline

    Assessment of viscosity (Np/mm) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  4. Baseline mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: Baseline

    Assessment of nonlinear elastic parameters (kPa) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  5. Baseline mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: Baseline

    Assessment of intramuscular fat (m/s) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  6. Baseline mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: Baseline

    Assessment of intramuscular blood flow (%) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: 12 months

    Assessment of muscle stiffness (kPa) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  2. Change from baseline in mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: 12 months

    Assessment of anisotropy (a.u.) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  3. Change from baseline in mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: 12 months

    Assessment of viscosity (Np/mm) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  4. Change from baseline in mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: 12 months

    Assessment of nonlinear elastic parameters (kPa) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  5. Change from baseline in mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: 12 months

    Assessment of intramuscular fat (m/s) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  6. Change from baseline in mechanical, structural, and physiological muscle ultrasound parameters

    Time frame: 12 months

    Assessment of intramuscular blood flow (%) in the lower extremity and/or upper extremity muscles across three participant groups

  7. Muscle function

    Time frame: Baseline and changes from baseline in at 12 months

    Muscle strength will be evaluated by dynamometry

  8. Functional outcomes

    Time frame: Baseline and changes from baseline at 12 months

    10-Meter Walk Test in DMD and BMD participants

  9. Functional outcomes

    Time frame: Baseline and changes from baseline at 12 months

    NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment performance in DMD and BMD participants

  10. Correlations between ultrasound measures, muscle function and functional outcomes

    Time frame: Through study completion, 12 months

    In both BMD and DMD, the correlation between each ultrasound imaging parameter [muscle stiffness (kPa), anisotropy (a.u.), viscosity (Np/mm), nonlinear elastic parameters (kPa), intramuscular fat (m/s), muscle volume (ml), and intramuscular blood flow (%)] and all functional endpoints [NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment, 10-Meter Walk Test] will be determined, as well as the ability of ultrasound measures to predict future change and loss in function.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Yann PEREON

CONTACT

[email protected]

0240083704

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • AGENCE NATIONALE DE RECHERCHE

Registry information

Official study title

Multiparametric Ultrafast Ultrasound Evaluation of Skeletal Muscle in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies

Acronym: INNOVAN

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.