Study of Genotype and Phenotype Characterization in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy With Small Mutations

In the last years, motor functional assessments have helped to define a better natural history of DMD patients, showing different clustering of disease progression according to the genotype and locus of mutation. Within the spectrum of severity of DMD, variability in phenotype among deletions has been previously reported. However all clinical assessments have the common disadvantage of being dependent on patient collaboration and interaction with the examiner. Therefore, the need to identify new biomarkers as measurable indicators of biologic condition has become important. To date several studies have shown that Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy provide sensitive markers of muscle pathology and disease progression in both upper and lower limbs of DMD subjects, suggesting MRI as a promising non-invasive candidate biomarker. Muscle MRI has the advantage of being relatively independent of patient collaboration. In previous studies, quantitative thigh muscle MRI values highly correlated with clinical outcome measures and loss of ambulation (LOA) and qualitative assessment scoring showed a direct correlation with the the duration of illness and fibro-fatty changes. More recently, our team found a relation between the functional scores and severe involvement on muscle MRI of upper limb in both ambulant and non-ambulant DMD boys. Furthermore, in the last decades the evidence that the age of LOA varies between DMD individuals carrying mutations abolishing dystrophin expression, has suggested the existence of trans-acting variants in modifier genes. It has been recently reported that some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a few identified genes can be considered as DMD modifiers and responsible for some of the inter-individual variability observed in the clinical disease course. To date, variants in five loci have been associated with variability in human DMD sub-phenotypes: Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), Latent Transforming Growth Factor-Beta Binding Protein 4 (LTBP4), Cluster of differentiation 40 (CD40), alfa-actinin-3 (ACTN3), and Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1). These genes are implicated in several interconnected molecular pathways regulating inflammatory response to muscle damage, regeneration, fibrosis or are more directly implicated in muscle power and sprint performance. Described variants have a regulatory function or alter protein sequence and could delay median LOA by approximately 1 to 2 years. Furthermore, more recently, native urine derived stem cells were demonstrated to express dystrophin transcript and protein (following myoblast determination protein 1 (MyoD) differentiation) in both DMD patients and control group and they could be considered a valid cell tool for either genotype characterization and functional studies on both DMD transcript and dystrophin (DYS) protein. So far, the results of the literature on small mutations report a wide variability of clinical findings and it could be hypothesized that the variable trajectories of progression and the overall severity and loss of important milestones may depend by several factors. One could assume that this finding could be related to the different site of mutations and specific exon involvement or to the type of the aminoacidic changes that could be able to produce different expressions of residual protein with subsequent differences in the severity of phenotypes. These points have not been systematically explored and the use of biomarkers may facilitate to identify distinct phenotypes and their correlation with different genotypes. This project aims to investigate whether specific genotype characterization, functional assessments, muscle MRI could help to establish a better genotype and phenotype characterization in a group of DMD patients carrying small mutations. I hypothesize that these tools alone or combined may help to allow describing the natural history.

Inclusion criteria

• DMD diagnosis confirming a small mutation genotype.

Exclusion criteria

• DMD patient enrolled in other clinical trials using genetic approach
• impossibility to perform MRI without sedation
• presence of severe cognitive or behavioral problems