Lung Volume Recruitment (LVR)
DeviceLVR will be used twice per day
NCT Number: NCT01999075
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy is complicated by weak breathing muscles and lung infections. "Lung volume recruitment" is a technique performed using a face mask or mouthpiece and a hand-held resuscitation bag to stack breaths, inflate the lungs and help clear the airways of secretions by increasing the forcefulness of a cough. We believe this will slow down the steady loss of lung function, prevent lung infection, and improve quality of life. Our aim is to compare the outcome of a group of individuals with DMD treated with standard care to another group that also receives lung volume recruitment. If effective, this study will change clinical practice by including twice-daily treatment as part of the standard of care for individuals with DMD, in order to improve their lung health and quality of life.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–16 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Background: Respiratory complications are the primary cause of morbidity and mortality associated with childhood Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Involvement of the respiratory muscles leads to progressive hypoventilation and/or recurrent atelectasis and pneumonia secondary to decreased cough efficacy. Lung volume recruitment (LVR) is a means of stacking breaths to achieve maximal lung inflation (MIC), prevent micro-atelectasis, and improve cough efficacy. Although it has been recommended by some experts as the "standard of care" for individuals with neuromuscular disease, the strategy has not been widely implemented in DMD given the lack of clinical trials to date to support its efficacy as well as the additional burden of care required in a population already requiring multiple interventions.
Primary Objective: To determine whether LVR, in addition to conventional treatment, is successful in reducing decline from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC) over 2 years (percent predicted, measured according to American Thoracic Society standards), compared to conventional treatment alone in children with DMD.
Secondary Objectives: To determine differences between children treated with LVR in addition to conventional treatment, compared to those treated with conventional treatment alone, in: (1) the number of courses of antibiotics, hospitalizations and intensive care admissions for respiratory exacerbations, (2) health-related quality of life, and (3) peak cough flow and other pulmonary function tests.
Methods: We propose a 3-year multi-centre randomized controlled trial involving fifteen tertiary care pediatric hospitals across Canada. The study population consists of boys aged 6-16 years with DMD and FVC ≥ 30% of predicted. A sample size of 110 participants will be enrolled. This has been informed by chart review and survey of participating centres to be feasible, and will be re-assessed with an ongoing internal pilot study. Intervention: Participants will be allocated with a minimization procedure to receive conventional treatment (non-invasive ventilation, nutritional supplementation, physiotherapy and/or antibiotics, as decided by the treating physician) or conventional treatment plus twice daily LVR exercises performed with an inexpensive, portable self-inflating resuscitation bag containing a one-way valve and a mouthpiece. Data Analysis: The primary outcome (change in percent predicted FVC over 2 years) will be compared between the two study groups using an analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) that takes into account baseline FVC and minimization factors.
Importance: Decline in pulmonary function among children with DMD negatively affects quality of life and predicts mortality. The relatively simple strategy of LVR has the potential to optimize pulmonary function and reduce respiratory exacerbations, thereby improving quality of life for individuals with DMD. This study is novel in that it is the first randomized controlled trial of LVR. A major strength is that the results will give support or refute recommendations regarding inclusion of LVR in the standard of care for individuals with DMD worldwide.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
LVR will be used twice per day
This may include: a. Physiotherapy, consisting of percussion, active cycle of breathing and/or postural drainage; b. Nutritional support, consisting of oral or tube-fed dietary supplements; c. Antibiotics (oral or intravenous), if there is evidence of respiratory infection; d. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, if there is evidence of nocturnal hypoventilation or sleep-disordered breathing; e. Systemic steroids
Time frame: 2 years
Change in FVC (%-predicted) was chosen as the primary outcome as it is a strong predictor of subsequent respiratory failure and mortality. Although survival is not a realistic endpoint for this trial, given expected mortality is less than 5% for the pediatric age group, FVC change is an appropriate clinical laboratory measure and valid surrogate endpoint to use for this trial.
Time frame: 2 years
The time to reach an FVC decline of 10% of predicted will be used to calculate a hazard ratio.
Time frame: 2 years
Total number of participants who received any antibiotic courses between baseline and two years
Time frame: 2 years
Measured biannually using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0). The PedsQL includes four subscales: Physical Functioning, Emotional Functioning, Social Functioning, and School Functioning. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. A total score is computed by averaging all subscale scores.
Time frame: 2 years
Change in the difference between assisted and unassisted peak cough flow (in liters per minute) from baseline to 2 years.
Time frame: 2 years
Change in maximal insufflation capacity (MIC)-vital capacity (VC) in liters from Baseline to 2 Years
Time frame: 2 years
Change in maximum inspiratory pressures (MIP, in centimeters of water), From Baseline to 2 Years
Time frame: 2 years
Change in maximal expiratory pressures (MEP, in liters), From Baseline to 2 Years
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
Mean rate of symptom months over the study period. Symptom months are months with any respiratory symptom.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Other
Stacking Exercises Attenuate the Decline in Forced Vital Capacity and Sick Time (STEADFAST)
Acronym: STEADFAST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04972604
Becker Muscular Dystrophy, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06861270
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06295718
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03689660
Biofeedback, Central Nervous System Diseases
Izmir, Balcova, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details