Department for Health, University of Bath
Bath, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT06898840
Glycaemic responses to carbohydrates ingested as fruit sugars may vary depending on factors inherent to the fruit and the type of sugar. The aim of this project is to investigate the glycaemic responses to a range of commercially available fruit drinks and to establish the glycaemic index for each product relative to a glucose reference. Differences in recorded responses could also be influenced by the sample type (capillary blood vs interstitial fluid) and participant characteristics. Participants will ingest 8 test drinks including 5 different fruit drinks (OJ, AJ, S&B, ENERGISE, BLUE), each matched for carbohydrate to the glucose reference (CONTROL) which will be sampled two times, an additional sample of one of the smoothies (S&B) will also be replicated. Fingerstick capillary blood sampling alongside dual sited continuous glucose monitors (CGM) will measure glucose and lactate concentrations, subjective appetite sensations will also be recorded. The tests will follow best practice guidelines for glycaemic index testing. These data will provide insight into how differing formulations can alter the glycaemic responses to fruit drinks, and whether sampling technique can affect the interpretations of measurement.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bath, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Commercially available fruit drinks or smoothies
Time frame: 120 minutes
Glycaemic indices [2-hour incremental area under the glucose curve (mmol/L-1x120 minutes) for each of the 5 test drinks relative to mean value of control conditions (CONTROL, REPLICATE CONTROL), expressed as a percentage] in capillary blood samples
Time frame: 120 minutes
The difference in glycaemic index [2-hour incremental area under the glucose curve (mmol/L-1x120 minutes) for 5 test drinks relative to mean control (CONTROL, REPLICATE CONTROL), expressed as a percentage] in capillary blood samples versus continuous glucose monitors.
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of blood glucose concentration 2-hour incremental area under the curve (iAUC) min.mmol/L between test conditions
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of postprandial peak concentration mmol/L of blood glucose between test conditions (Cmax)
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of time to peak blood glucose concentration in minutes (Tmax) between test conditions
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of blood glucose concentration mmol/L at 2 hours between test conditions
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of glucose concentration 2-hour incremental area under the curve (iAUC) min.mmol/L between test conditions
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of postprandial peak concentration mmol/L of glucose between test conditions (Cmax)
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of time to peak glucose concentration in minutes (Tmax) between test conditions
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of glucose concentration mmol/L at 2 hours between test conditions
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of blood lactate concentration 2-hour incremental area under the curve (iAUC) min.mmol/L between test conditions
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of postprandial peak concentration mmol/L of blood lactate between test conditions (Cmax)
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of time to peak blood lactate concentration in minutes (Tmax) between test conditions
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of blood lactate concentration mmol/L at 2 hours between test conditions
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of subjective appetite sensations assessed with visual analogue scales (2-hour area under the curve min.mmVAS)
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of Postprandial lactate concentration min.mmol/L between individuals 2-hour incremental area under curve (iAUC)
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of Postprandial glucose concentration min.mmol/L between individuals 2-hour incremental area under curve (iAUC)
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison of Appetite rating responses min.mmVAS between individuals 2-hour area under curve (AUC)
Time frame: 120 minutes
Comparison within individuals of interstitial glucose concentrations measurements from continuous glucose monitors on left and right arms.
University of Bath
Other
Study to Examine Glycaemic Responses to the Ingestion of Fruit Juices and Smoothies Using Different Measurement Methodologies.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07729631
Glycaemic Index, Glycaemic Response
Bath, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT04147273
Continous Glucose Measurement, Glycaemic Index
Düsseldorf, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT01682174
Glycaemic Index, Glycaemic Response
Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT01536847
Glycaemic Index, Glycaemic Response
View Trial Details