West-German Center of Diabetes and Health
Düsseldorf, 40591, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04147273
Self-monitoring of blood glucose using capillary glucose testing has a number of shortcomings compared to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We aimed to compare these two methods and used blood glucose measurements in venous blood as a reference. Despite considerable inter-individual variability of postprandial glycemic responses, CGM evaluated postprandial glycemic excursions which had comparable results compared to standard blood glucose measurements under real-life conditions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Düsseldorf, 40591, Germany
Self-monitoring of blood glucose using capillary glucose testing (C) has a number of shortcomings compared to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We aimed to compare these two methods and used blood glucose measurements in venous blood (IV) as a reference. Postprandial blood glucose levels were measured after 50 g oral glucose load and after the consumption of a portion of different foods containing 50 g of carbohydrates. We also evaluated the associations between postprandial glucose responses and the clinical characteristics of the participants at the beginning of the study. Incremental area under the curve (AUCi) of postprandial blood glucose was calculated for 1 h (AUCi 0-60) and 2 h (AUCi 0-120). Despite considerable inter-individual variability of postprandial glycemic responses, CGM evaluated postprandial glycemic excursions which had comparable results compared to standard blood glucose measurements under real-life conditions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
One day prior to the study beginning, participants were equipped with a CGM system (FreeStyle Libre®, Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA, USA). This CGM system provides glucose recordings every 15 min over a period of 14 days. The glucose data were downloaded manually by a scan with a handheld device.
On the second day of the study, participants consumed portions of these three test products containing 50 g of available carbohydrate on 3 separate days without a washout period. The products were tested in random order at the same time of the morning after a 10 h overnight fast. Venous blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 min postprandial by inserting an intravenous cannula into a forearm vein. Capillary blood samples were obtained through finger pricking. Blood glucose levels in these samples were measured with a high quality SMBG system (ContourXT/Contour next, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Leverkusen, Deutschland, Germany).
Time frame: 1 and 2 hours after food consumption
postprandial glycemic changes after consuming different carbohydrate containing foods
Time frame: 1 and 2 hours after food consumption
after consuming different carbohydrate containing foods
West German Center of Diabetes and Health
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05453838
Postprandial Glucose Response
Utrecht, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT05266690
Postprandial Glucose Response
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07567443
Insulin Response, Lactose Digestion
View Trial DetailsNCT07729631
Glycaemic Index, Glycaemic Response
Bath, United Kingdom
View Trial Details