Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01530841

Efficacy and Tolerance of AVAPS Mode in Myotonic Dystrophy

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is a myopathy with complex respiratory pattern and at risk to develop respiratory failure. Classical mode of ventilation are sometimes not tolerated or ineffective in this population. New modes of nocturnal ventilation by combining both volumetric and barometric advantages. The aim of this study is to compare effect of AVAPS mode to bilevel pressure support.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Justification of study

Respiratory abnormalities are complex in Myotonic dystrophy type 1. Some patients presented with isolated alveolar hypoventilation and breathe rhythm irregularity. Nocturnal ventilation is usually proposed but usual modes of ventilation can't provide enough respiratory assistance for patients especially during REM sleep or too much respiratory assistance increasing the risk of asynchrony. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of the mode AVAPS (a mode permitting a pressure support with guaranteed volume and offering advantage of volume and pressure support with Bipap A30 Phillips Respironics) compared to bilevel pressure support.

Main Objective To evaluate efficacy of AVAPS Mode at day 7 on arterial PCO2 under ventilation after launching ventilation.

Secondary Objectives To evaluate efficacy of AVAPS Mode at day 90 on daytime arterial PCO2 after launching ventilation.

To evaluate compliance to ventilation at day 7 and 90. To evaluate clinical efficacy on respiratory symptoms, dyspnea and sleepiness at day 1 and 90.

To evaluate quality of life at day 1 and 90. To evaluate effect of AVAPS on polysomnography, nocturnal SaO2, nocturnal PtCO2.

To evaluate Multiple sleep latency and Maintenance of wakefulness tests at day 90.

To evaluate effect of AVAPS on respiratory parameters VC and mouth maximal pressures.

Type of study: Prospective, monocentre, randomized, controlled single blind study on 2 parallel group.

Number of subjects: 32 patients recruited in home ventilation unit of Raymond Poincaré hospital.

Selection criteria : Patients with Myotonic dystrophy presenting at least one clinical signs : effort or rest dyspnea, orthopnea, sleepiness, morning headache or VC<50% or Pi max< 60 cm H2O or time of SaO2<90% more than 5 minutes and Hypercapnia > 6.0 kPa.

Study process Preceding screening period within the 3 months before inclusion. Day 1 to day 3 baseline evaluation. Day 3 Inclusion and Randomisation Day 3 to 8 Launch of ventilation Day 8 Home discharge Day 90 Evaluation of efficacy (secondary objectives) and observance.

Duration Participation of a patient 3 months. Period of inclusion 24 months. Total duration of study 30 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men or women aged > 18 years
  • Written consent
  • DM1 myotonic dystrophy
  • One clinical signs dyspnea rest/effort, orthopnea, daytime sleepiness (Epworth> 10), morning headache.

Or restrictive syndrome: VC< 50 % or Pi max <60 cm H2O Or time of nocturnal saturation < 90 %, > 5 minutes. AND Hypercapnia > 6.0 kPa Pregnancy test negative or use of contraception for women in age of procreation

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient using previously home ventilation within the 6 months before entering the study
  • Patient denying home ventilation
  • Refusal to sign consent
  • impossibility to be followed during 3 months
  • Impossibility to apply ventilation at home
  • No social/health coverage
  • Patient under tutelage

Treatment and study plan

Nocturnal ventilation

Device

Home ventilation only the mode AVAPS will be used if the patient is randomized in the experimental group.

Other names: BIPAP A30

Primary outcomes

  1. arterial PCO2 under ventilation

    Time frame: 7 days

    To evaluate efficacy of AVAPS Mode versus bilevel pressure mode at day 7 on arterial PCO2 under ventilation after launching ventilation

Secondary outcomes

  1. daytime arterial PCO2 after launching ventilation.

    Time frame: 90 days

    To evaluate efficacy of AVAPS Mode at day 90 on daytime arterial PCO2 after launching ventilation.

  2. Compliance to ventilation

    Time frame: 7 and 90 days

    To evaluate compliance (h/24h) to ventilation at days 7 and 90.

  3. Symptoms

    Time frame: 90 days

    To evaluate clinical efficacy on respiratory symptoms, dyspnea and sleepiness at day 1 and 90.

  4. Sleep studies

    Time frame: 90 days

    To evaluate effect of AVAPS on polysomnography, nocturnal SaO2, nocturnal PtCO2 at day 90.

  5. OBJECTIVE SLEEPINESS

    Time frame: 90 days

    To evaluate Multiple sleep latency and Maintenance of wakefulness tests at day 90.

  6. Respiratory parameters

    Time frame: 90 days

    To evaluate effect of AVAPS on respiratory parameters VC and mouth maximal pressures.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805

Other

Collaborators

  • Adep Assistance
  • Philips Respironics

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Randomized Controlled Single Blind Study of Efficacy and Tolerance of AVAPS Mode Compared to Bilevel Pressure Ventilation un Adult Patients With Myotonic Dystrophy

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Feb 10, 2012
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.