Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07719972

Universal Newborn Screening For Sickle Cell Disease In Mozambique

The overarching goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a new methodology that combines three multi-level implementation strategies to optimize the population-level uptake of essential evidence-based, standard of care treatments for infants with sickle cell disease (SCD) in low-resource settings. The study will be done in Mozambique.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

This prospective mixed-methods hybrid effectiveness-implementation feasibility study will evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an implementation strategy package designed to improve early diagnosis and care entry for children born with sickle cell disease (SCD) in rural, low-resource settings. The implementation strategy package includes three components: 1) integration of essential products into national supply chain systems, 2) integration of systematic newborn screening using point-of-care-testing into clinical site workflows and 3) linkage of children who screen positive to a PEN-Plus Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) clinic for longitudinal care. Participants will be tracked longitudinally to evaluate protocol adoption over time and clinical outcomes among participating children at 2 years of age.

Primary Objective

  • To test if combining three multi-level implementation strategies can facilitate systematic birth diagnosis and timely linkage to evidence-based care interventions for infants with SCD in under-resourced settings.

Secondary Objectives (Micro level):

  • To test the clinical effectiveness of implementing the BB-SCD through the three combined implementation strategies to prevent excess mortality of children with SCD under the age of 2 years.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of combining the three implementation strategies to promote care retention among infants with SCD by 2 years of age.

Secondary Objectives (Meso level)

  • To evaluate the institutional coverage and health facility staff adoption of the treatment for infants through the combined implementation strategies.
  • To evaluate the need for a confirmatory test among positive and negative screening results using POCT.
  • To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the combined implementation strategies.

Secondary Objective (Macro level)

  • To evaluate the operational effectiveness of integrating the procurement of SCD consumables into national supply chain systems to achieve sustainable availability, effective last mile delivery to relevant clinics and stockout avoidance.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children participants: All infants between birth and 6.0 months of age who are born or receive care at secondary-level facilities involved in the UNIQUE study.
  • Children participants will fall into one of two categories:
  • Patient participants: All infants between birth and 6.0 months of age who were screened through the UNIQUE study and tested positive for SCD (HbSS, HbSC, or other form of SCD) or had indeterminate results.
  • Healthy control participants: Infants between birth and 6.0 months of age who screen negative for SCD (HbAA) through the UNIQUE study or tested positive for sickle cell trait (HbAS).
  • Health facility staff participants: Healthcare staff ages ≥18 years working at secondary-level facilities involved in the UNIQUE study.
  • Supply chain expert participants: Administrative professionals with experience working in or around the national supply chain systems in Mozambique to support procurement, importation, customs clearance, storage, and in-country distribution of medical products.
  • National public health system expert participants: Administrative professionals with experience working in the national public health system (e.g., Ministry of Health, MISAU) who oversee the delivery of health services to infants in-country, such as neonatal testing and vaccination programs.

Exclusion criteria

  • Children participants:
  • Stillbirths.
  • Children who received an erythrocyte (blood) transfusion within 3 months of testing. Exogenous (transfused) HbA could artificially lower the sickle hemoglobin concentration, thus causing false-negative results.
  • Patient participants: none
  • Healthy control participants:
  • Stillbirths.
  • Children who received an erythrocyte (blood) transfusion within 3 months of testing. Exogenous (transfused) HbA could artificially lower the sickle hemoglobin concentration, thus causing false-negative results.
  • Health facility staff participants: none.
  • Supply chain expert participants: none.
  • National public health system expert participants: none.

Treatment and study plan

Point-of-care testing (POCT) -Patient participants

Other

Infants will be screened for Sickle Cell Disease using with point-of-care testing (POCT).

Point-of-care testing (POCT) - Healthy control participants

Other

Infants will be screened for Sickle Cell Disease using with point-of-care testing (POCT) and prospectively monitored for survival.

Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) survey

Other

The COACH survey will collect quantitative data on eight contextual factors that impact a site's ability to implement evidence-based interventions.

semi-structured interview

Other

Interview questions will revolve primarily around the current process for SCD screening and care referrals, factors impacting newborn care delivery and screening, and challenges to integrating SCD newborn screening and care referral into standard care delivery.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of eligible population screened for Sickle Cell Disease

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Percentage of new SCD cases linked to care

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of under-2 mortality between participants with SCD whom received longitudinal care and participants who screened negative for SCD

    Time frame: 2 years post-screening and therapy

    The primary outcome measure will be 'Alive and in care: Yes or No'.

  2. Percentage of SCD cases retained in care by 2 years of age

    Time frame: 2 years post-screening and therapy

  3. Percentage of eligible secondary-level clinical wards implementing systematic screening and linkage to longitudinal care for new SCD cases

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Percentage of eligible health facility staff participants in secondary-level clinical wards implementing systematic screening and linkage to longitudinal care for new SCD cases

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Comparison of SCD Screening Performance Results from Initial point-of-care (POCT), Gazelle, and Hemoglobin Fractionation

    Time frame: 3 years

    Investigators will estimate the sensitivity (proportion of diseased subjects that yield a positive test result) and specificity (the proportion of non-diseased subjects that yield a negative test result) of the POCT for detecting SCD compared to the gold standard with basic proportions.

  6. Cost-Effectiveness of Integrating SCD Consumables into National Supply Chains

    Time frame: 2 to 5 years

    The standard formula known as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) will be used. ICER is a summary statistic used in economic evaluations to compare the relative value of different healthcare interventions. It is scored by comparing the resulting cost-per-QALY against a predefined threshold, where lower ICERs indicate better value.

  7. Cost-Effectiveness of POCT for Early SCD Diagnosis

    Time frame: 2 to 5 years

    The standard formula known as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) will be used. ICER is a summary statistic used in economic evaluations to compare the relative value of different healthcare interventions. It is scored by comparing the resulting cost-per-QALY against a predefined threshold, where lower ICERs indicate better value.

  8. Cost-Effectiveness of Decentralized PEN-Plus SCD Management

    Time frame: 2 to 5 years

    The standard formula known as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) will be used. ICER is a summary statistic used in economic evaluations to compare the relative value of different healthcare interventions. It is scored by comparing the resulting cost-per-QALY against a predefined threshold, where lower ICERs indicate better value.

  9. Frequency of SCD Supply Stockouts at Study Sites

    Time frame: 5 years

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jane Hankins, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

888-226-4343

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2031
Study completion
2031
First posted
Jul 22, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.