Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06871605

Transversalis Fascia Plane vs Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block for the Treatment of CPIP

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided transversalis fascia plane block (TFP) and ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) nerve block in the treatment of chronic post-herniorrhaphy inguinal pain (CPIP) refractory to conservative treatments. For this evaluation, a numerical rating scale (NRS) will be used before and after both interventions.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Chronic post-herniorrhaphy inguinal pain (CPIP) after inguinal hernia surgery significantly affects quality of life and daily activities. The incidence of this condition ranges from 15% to 53% and its management is often challenging. CPIP is defined as pain lasting more than three months and can be diagnosed if no organic cause can be found to explain the pain at the end of this period. There are various methods in the treatment of CPIP, including medical therapy, nerve blocks and surgical intervention.

The inguinal region is mainly innervated by the ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) nerves. These nerves are the most commonly damaged structures after inguinal hernia surgery.

However, the II and IH nerves can be easily blocked in isolation throughout their entire course in the groin area or in the abdominal wall at different injection sites using fascial plane blocks such as transversalis fascia plan block (TFP). These blocks are frequently preferred because of their ease of application and wide analgesic effects. Therefore, studies investigating the efficacy of fascial blocks that provide ease of application are increasing.

Although TFP and II-IH blocks have been used in the treatment of acute postoperative inguinal pain, they have been used in a limited number of studies for CPIP; however, no study has compared the efficacy and advers effect rates of these methods.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of these two treatment modalities. The secondary aim is to determine the incidence of adverse events associated with US-guided TFP and II-IH nerve block therapy. A total of at least 80 patients will be enrolled for comparison, 40 patients in each group. The NRS score will be compared both within and between groups before, 1 month after and 3 months after treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Complaints of inguinal pain >12 weeks post-herniorrhaphy surgery
  • >18 years of age
  • Failure of conservative pain management

Exclusion criteria

  • Other causes of inguinal pain (haematoma, infection, tubo-ovarian disease, abscess, etc., gynaecological, urological and organic pathologies after inguinal hernia, etc.)
  • Pregnancy
  • Coagulopathy, antiaggregant/anticoagulant/antiplatelet use
  • Unstable psychiatric illness

Treatment and study plan

ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block

Procedure

With the patient in the lateral decubitus position, an 8-12 Hz linear ultrasound (US) probe is placed transversely over the iliac crest. The external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO) and transversus abdominis (TA) muscles are identified so that the abdominal muscles are in the field of view. The TA muscle is then advanced posteriorly until it tapers to the thoracolumbar fascia with its aponeurosis adjacent to the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle. The 22 gauge block needle is advanced in plane with the US probe. After placing the needle tip in the virtual triangular plane between the posterior edge of the TA muscle, the QL and the underlying transversalis fascia, 4 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 2 mL of a total of 8 mg dexamethasone + 4 mL of saline are injected for a total volume of 10 mL.

ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block group

Procedure

With the patient in the supine position, an 8-12 Hz linear ultrasound (US) probe is placed medial and cephalal to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), transversely between the ASIS and the umbilicus. The external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO) and transversus abdominis (TA) muscles are identified so that the abdominal muscles are in the field of view. The II-IH nerves are hyperechogenic in the fascial plane between the IO and TA muscles. A 22 gauge block needle is advanced in plane with the US probe. When the needle tip is advanced to the II and IH nerves, 4 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 2 mL total 8 mg dexamethasone + 4 mL saline is injected for a total volume of 10 mL.

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical rating scale (NRS)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 1st and 3rd month after treatment

    NRS is a scale that can be used measuring pain. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain)

Secondary outcomes

  1. procedure-related adverse events

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 1st and 3rd month after treatment

    Any adverse events that occur during and after the TFP and II-IH block procedures will be recorded.

  2. patient satisfaction likert scale

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 30 minutes after procedure

    Patient satisfaction is measured using a five-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied and 5 = very satisfied).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Gozde EROL

CONTACT

[email protected]

5325827856 ext. TR

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Transversalis Fascia Plane Block With Ultrasound-guided Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in the Treatment of Chronic Post-herniorrhaphy Inguinal Pain

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Mar 12, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 12, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.