Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07473687

Feasibility Study of Non-Contact Imaging-Based Physiological Monitoring in the Operating Room

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a non-contact, camera-based physiological monitoring technology in a perioperative setting (including anesthesia induction, surgery, and recovery).Conventional vital sign monitoring tools-such as ECG leads, blood pressure cuffs, and pulse oximeters-require direct skin contact, which may pose risks of cross-infection or skin injury in vulnerable populations (e.g., newborns or elderly patients). This research utilizes remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG) technology to estimate vital signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), by analyzing facial video captured via standard camera devices (Logitech C930, iPhone 16 Pro Max, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra).The primary goal is to assess the consistency and stability of this non-contact system compared to clinical gold-standard monitors (Masimo Root, SedLine O3, and Radical-7) during actual surgical procedures. The findings will serve as a foundation for developing non-invasive, supplementary monitoring tools in dynamic clinical environments.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Taipei, 11217, Taiwan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Hui-Hsuan Ke

CONTACT

[email protected]

+886-939-196-809

About this study

Background and Rationale:

Perioperative vital sign monitoring is crucial for patient safety. However, current standard-of-care tools are predominantly contact-based or invasive. These devices can cause discomfort, limit patient mobility, and potentially damage fragile skin. While various non-contact sensing technologies (e.g., radar, thermal imaging) have been researched, high costs and poor adaptability to dynamic clinical settings have limited their routine use. Our team has previously validated a camera-based rPPG algorithm in clinical environments; this study seeks to further evaluate its feasibility within the rigorous conditions of an operating room (OR).

Study Objectives:

To evaluate the accuracy and consistency of a non-contact video monitoring system in measuring heart rate, blood pressure, and SpO2 across different surgical phases (pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative).To optimize algorithms using multi-point clinical data to enhance system robustness in dynamic surgical environments. To explore the potential of rPPG technology as a supplementary or alternative monitoring solution for patients unsuitable for traditional contact-based sensors.

Methodology:

This is a feasibility study conducted in a perioperative clinical environment. Participants will undergo simultaneous monitoring by two systems without interference with routine medical care:

  • Investigational Device (Non-contact): A software module utilizing rPPG technology installed on multiple platforms (Logitech C930 with Windows Laptop, iPhone 16 Pro Max, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra). These devices capture facial video via front-facing cameras to calculate physiological parameters non-invasively.
  • Reference Standard (Clinical Monitors): The Masimo Root monitoring platform, equipped with SedLine O3 regional oximetry and Radical-7 pulse oximetry, will provide the benchmark physiological data.

Data Analysis:

The estimated physiological parameters from the non-contact software will be compared with the synchronized data from the Masimo Root system. Statistical analysis will focus on the correlation and limits of agreement between the two methods to determine the technical feasibility for future clinical translation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged >18 years.
  • Patients scheduled to undergo surgical procedures under general anesthesia.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I, II, or III.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients aged < 18 years.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Patients whose facial images cannot be captured or recognized (e.g., due to surgical drapes, severe edema, or major trauma).
  • Patients who refuse to participate or have not signed the informed consent form.
  • Other cases deemed unsuitable for the study by the clinical physician or anesthesiologist.

Treatment and study plan

Non-contact rPPG software

Device

A non-invasive, video-based software utilizing remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG) technology to estimate heart rate, blood pressure, and SpO2 by analyzing facial video captured via camera-enabled devices.

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of Heart Rate (HR) monitoring

    Time frame: From anesthesia induction to recovery (approximately 2-6 hours).

    The success rate of non-contact HR measurement using the rPPG software compared to the reference values from the Masimo Root clinical monitoring platform. A "success" is defined as an absolute error within +/- 3 bpm.

    Unit of Measure: Percentage of successful measurements (%)

  2. Success rate of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) monitoring

    Time frame: From anesthesia induction to recovery (approximately 2-6 hours).

    The success rate of non-contact SBP measurement compared to the reference values from the Masimo Root platform. A "success" is defined as an absolute error within +/- 12 mmHg.

    Unit of Measure: Percentage of successful measurements (%)

  3. Success rate of Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) monitoring

    Time frame: From anesthesia induction to recovery (approximately 2-6 hours).

    The success rate of non-contact DBP measurement compared to the reference values from the Masimo Root platform. A "success" is defined as an absolute error within +/- 10 mmHg.

    Unit of Measure: Percentage of successful measurements (%)

  4. Success rate of Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) monitoring

    Time frame: From anesthesia induction to recovery (approximately 2-6 hours).

    The success rate of non-contact SpO2 measurement compared to the reference values from the Masimo Root platform. A "success" is defined as an absolute error within +/- 8% (when SpO2 >/= 80%) or +/- 15% (when SpO2 < 80%).

    Unit of Measure: Percentage of successful measurements (%)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of Heart Rate (HR) across hardware platforms

    Time frame: During the intraoperative phase (duration of the surgical procedure, approximately 2-6 hours).

    Evaluation of the Heart Rate measurement consistency among three devices (Logitech C930, iPhone 16 Pro Max, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra) compared to the Masimo Root monitor. The measurement tool is the rPPG software. Consistency will be assessed by calculating the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of heart rate.

    Unit of Measure: Beats per minute (bpm)

  2. Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP) across hardware platforms

    Time frame: During the intraoperative phase (duration of the surgical procedure, approximately 2-6 hours).

    Evaluation of the Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure measurement consistency among three devices (Logitech C930, iPhone 16 Pro Max, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra) compared to the Masimo Root monitor. The measurement tool is the rPPG software. Consistency will be assessed by calculating the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of blood pressure.

    Unit of Measure: mmHg

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Hui-Hsuan Ke

CONTACT

[email protected]

+886-939-196-809

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Other Gov

Registry information

Acronym: IBPM

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2030
First posted
Mar 16, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.