Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06451432

The (Cost-) Effectiveness of Paediatric Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Compared to Open Hernia Repair

This study assess the (cost-)effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique for unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children aged 0-16 years.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

0 year–16 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Maxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Research question Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations in children. After open unilateral inguinal hernia repair, 6-8% of patients develops an inguinal hernia on the contralateral side. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia offers the opportunity to inspect the contralateral groin and repair an asymptomatic contralateral hernia, if present.

Main question: What is the most (cost-)effective treatment strategy for unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children aged 0-16 years: the open or laparoscopic Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique?

Hypothesis The optimal treatment for children with an inguinal hernia is laparoscopic hernia repair, since the surgeon can inspect and possibly, repair, the contralateral groin. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair results in less operations and exposure to anaesthesia, less hospital admissions, lower costs and a better quality of life compared to open inguinal hernia repair.

Study design Multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Study population Children aged 0 - 16 years with a unilateral inguinal hernia.

Intervention Inguinal hernia repair with the laparoscopic PIRS technique.

Usual care/comparison Inguinal hernia repair with the open technique.

Outcome Measures Primary: Number of operations related to inguinal hernia repair and cost-effectiveness (social and healthcare related costs). Secondary: complications, total duration of surgery (including anaesthesia and total duration of operating room time), post-operative pain, length of hospital stay, time to normal daily activities, cosmetic appearance, health-related quality of life. All outcome measures will be assessed within two years after the primary inguinal hernia correction.

Sample size/data analysis 464 patients (power of 0.80, alpha 0.05). Cost-effectiveness analysis/budget impact analysis The economic evaluation will be assessed from a societal and health care perspective. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed in terms of QALYs and the primary and secondary outcomes. A budget impact analysis will be conducted using the "Budget Impact Analyse - leidraad en rekentool" of ZonMw. Missing data will be imputed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants aged 0 months to 16 years of age with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia undergoing hernia repair

Exclusion criteria

  • incarcerated inguinal hernia, which have to be operated immediately,
  • recurrent hernia
  • ventricular-peritoneal drain
  • non-descended testis
  • parents who are not able to understand the nature or consequences of the study.

Treatment and study plan

Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique

Procedure

Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique

Primary outcomes

  1. Re-operation rate

    Time frame: within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair

    Number of re-operations related to primary inguinal hernia repair

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complications

    Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair

    Surgical and anesthesiological complications

  2. Duration of Surgery

    Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair

    Total duration of surgery (including anaesthesia and total duration of operating room time)

  3. Post-operative pain

    Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair

    Postoperative pain is as medication requirement and VAS-score (1-9 score, 9 point scale, higher score equals more pain)

  4. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair

    Number of days

  5. Time to normal daily activities

    Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair

    Number of days

  6. Cosmetic appearance

    Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair

    Cosmetic appearance is scored by parents and a member of a research team using a 5-Likert scale (scale 1-5, higher score equals a better outcome)

  7. Health-related quality of life

    Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair

    Health related quality of life will be measured using the EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) four weeks, one year, and two years after primary surgery. A higher score equals a better outcome.

  8. Cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: Cost-effectiveness is measured qithin two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair

    Cost-effectiveness is based of societal and healthcare costs.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Joep Derikx, prof.dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

020 - 566 8000

Sanne Maat, MD. PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

020 - 566 8000

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Other

Registry information

Official study title

'Hernia Endoscopic oR opeN Repair In chIldren Analysis": A Randomized Controlled Trial to Study the (Cost-) Effectiveness of Paediatric Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Compared to Open Hernia Repair

Acronym: HERNIIA-2

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 11, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.