Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique
ProcedurePercutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique
NCT Number: NCT06451432
This study assess the (cost-)effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique for unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children aged 0-16 years.
Interested in participating?
Request Info0 year–16 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Maxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands
Research question Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations in children. After open unilateral inguinal hernia repair, 6-8% of patients develops an inguinal hernia on the contralateral side. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia offers the opportunity to inspect the contralateral groin and repair an asymptomatic contralateral hernia, if present.
Main question: What is the most (cost-)effective treatment strategy for unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children aged 0-16 years: the open or laparoscopic Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique?
Hypothesis The optimal treatment for children with an inguinal hernia is laparoscopic hernia repair, since the surgeon can inspect and possibly, repair, the contralateral groin. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair results in less operations and exposure to anaesthesia, less hospital admissions, lower costs and a better quality of life compared to open inguinal hernia repair.
Study design Multicentre randomized controlled trial.
Study population Children aged 0 - 16 years with a unilateral inguinal hernia.
Intervention Inguinal hernia repair with the laparoscopic PIRS technique.
Usual care/comparison Inguinal hernia repair with the open technique.
Outcome Measures Primary: Number of operations related to inguinal hernia repair and cost-effectiveness (social and healthcare related costs). Secondary: complications, total duration of surgery (including anaesthesia and total duration of operating room time), post-operative pain, length of hospital stay, time to normal daily activities, cosmetic appearance, health-related quality of life. All outcome measures will be assessed within two years after the primary inguinal hernia correction.
Sample size/data analysis 464 patients (power of 0.80, alpha 0.05). Cost-effectiveness analysis/budget impact analysis The economic evaluation will be assessed from a societal and health care perspective. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed in terms of QALYs and the primary and secondary outcomes. A budget impact analysis will be conducted using the "Budget Impact Analyse - leidraad en rekentool" of ZonMw. Missing data will be imputed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique
Time frame: within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair
Number of re-operations related to primary inguinal hernia repair
Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair
Surgical and anesthesiological complications
Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair
Total duration of surgery (including anaesthesia and total duration of operating room time)
Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair
Postoperative pain is as medication requirement and VAS-score (1-9 score, 9 point scale, higher score equals more pain)
Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair
Number of days
Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair
Number of days
Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair
Cosmetic appearance is scored by parents and a member of a research team using a 5-Likert scale (scale 1-5, higher score equals a better outcome)
Time frame: Within two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair
Health related quality of life will be measured using the EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) four weeks, one year, and two years after primary surgery. A higher score equals a better outcome.
Time frame: Cost-effectiveness is measured qithin two years after the primary inguinal hernia repair
Cost-effectiveness is based of societal and healthcare costs.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Joep Derikx, prof.dr.
CONTACT
Sanne Maat, MD. PhD
CONTACT
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Other
'Hernia Endoscopic oR opeN Repair In chIldren Analysis": A Randomized Controlled Trial to Study the (Cost-) Effectiveness of Paediatric Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Compared to Open Hernia Repair
Acronym: HERNIIA-2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07618884
Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07473583
Digestive System Diseases, Hernia
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07473687
Biliary Tract Diseases, Cholecystitis
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07423910
Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal
Tampere, Finland
View Trial Details