Cliniques du Souffle
Lodève, Herault, 34700, France
NCT Number: NCT03368703
Patients with COPD have lower cortical activation and higher cortical inhibitory levels. The purpose of this study is to test the reversibility the lower cortical activation by counterbalancing the increased cortical inhibitory levels with neuro-modulation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lodève, Herault, 34700, France
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients exhibit not only respiratory symptoms but also a peripheral muscular weakness. This weakness is characterized by a loss in strength, harmful for the patients' life quality and vital prognostic. Even if many papers have enlightened damages at a peripheral level, the muscular atrophy itself cannot totally explain the loss in force. Furthermore, the contractile properties of COPD muscles fibres are preserved. Consequently, it seems that the peripheral muscle weakness cannot only be explained by peripheral factors and central structures may be involved.
A recent work showed that during quadriceps voluntary contraction, cortical activation in COPD patients was significantly lower than in healthy subjects, contributing in the loss in strength. However, the pathophysiology underlying this loss of strength is still unclear and two hypotheses can be advanced: 1) the influence of anatomical lesions in the brain of COPD patients and 2) the particular metabolism of this population. Indeed, COPD patients show a reduced oxidative activity and an increased glycolytic contribution (decreased type I fibres and increased type II fibres, increased glycolytic enzymes activity, increased metabolites production). This specific metabolic may lead to an over-activation of type III-IV afferents, projecting onto somatosensory cortex sensitive to metabolites at a peripheral level, and produce inhibitory activity on the primary motor cortex, seat of the motor control. What is reported in the literature so far, is that COPD patients display increased cortical inhibitory values than healthy subjects.
Therefore, beyond understanding better the nervous mechanisms involved in the COPD's peripheral muscle weakness, the aim of this study is to counterbalance this increased cortical inhibitory level.
We hypothesize that modulating inhibitory processes at a cortical level would induced a reduction of inhibitions in patients with COPD and an increase in the force produced. In case this hypothesis would be verified, we will be able to confirm that this increased cortical level in COPD patients is reversible and may be a target for rehabilitation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
2mA / 20min Anodal and Sham tDCS over dominant M1. Anodal tDCS consists of 30s of ramp up followed by 20min of stimulation and 30s of ramp down.
Sham tDCS consists of only 30s of ramp up followed by 30s of ramp down and no further stimulation.
Participants therefore have the same feeling for both modalities : slight itching due to the induced current at the beginning of the protocol (during around 30s) allowing no differentiation by the participant between the anodal or sham sessions.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ; Post-Stim (immediately post-intervention) ; Post-30 (30min post-intervention)
Cortical excitability
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ; Post-Stim (immediately post-intervention) ; Post-30 (30min post-intervention)
Cortical inhibition level
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ; Post-Stim (immediately post-intervention) ; Post-30 (30min post-intervention)
Cortical inhibition level
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ; Post-Stim (immediately post-intervention) ; Post-30 (30min post-intervention)
Motor command
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) ; Post-Stim (immediately post-intervention) ; Post-30 (30min post-intervention)
Functional output
5 Santé
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03807258
Behavior, Chronic Disease
Lodève, Herault, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02839070
Physiology
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02850367
Physiology
Grenoble, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01154582
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Bobigny, France
View Trial Details