Minia University
Minya, Minya Governorate, 61511, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06401187
Statement of problem. Patient satisfaction and maximum biting force from patients who wear 2-implant-retained overdentures with different constructed bar attachments can be improved.
Purpose. This randomised controlled clinical trial assessed patient satisfaction and maximum biting force with three differently constructed bar-retained overdentures (conventional casting, Milling and 3D printing CAD/CAM techniques) within a one-year follow-up.
Material and methods. A total of 60 implants were placed in 30 mandibular jaws(30 participants). The jaws were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 treatment groups: a 10 conventional technique cast Co-Cr bar attachment, a 10 Co-Cr CAD/CAM milled bar attachment, and a 10 Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D-printed bar attachment all groups were connected to 2 implants in the canine area. Patient satisfaction was tested after 6 months, and 12 months for each group; the results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analysed using a Pair-wise comparisons test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Maximum biting force was tested at baseline,3 months, 6 months, and 12 months for each group; the results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analysed using a Pair-wise comparisons test and ANOVA test.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Minya, Minya Governorate, 61511, Egypt
A total of 60 implants were placed in 30 mandibular jaws(30 participants). The jaws were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 treatment groups: a 10 conventional technique cast Co-Cr bar attachment, a 10 Co-Cr CAD/CAM milled bar attachment, and a 10 Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D-printed bar attachment all groups were connected to 2 implants in the canine area. Patient satisfaction was tested after 6 months, and 12 months for each group; the results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analysed using a Pair-wise comparisons test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Maximum biting force was tested at baseline,3 months, 6 months, and 12 months for each group; the results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analysed using a Pair-wise comparisons test and ANOVA test.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
use of bar attachments as retentive mean of denture
Other names: bar overdenture implants
Time frame: 1 year
questionnaire
Time frame: 1 year
occlusal force meter
Minia University
Other
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Maximum Biting Force of Three Different Constructed Bars in Implant Overdenture in One Year Follow-up
Acronym: bar
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07427706
Apgar Score, Behavior
Tarragona, Reus, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07368114
Bone Graft, Dental
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07184879
Dental, Dental Anxiety
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06808243
Dental, Implant
Minya, Egypt
View Trial Details