Hospital of faculty of dentistry, Minia university
Minya, 61517, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06808243
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Modified Vascularized Interpositional Periosteal Connective Tissue Graft (mVIP-CTG) compared to Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix (XCM) around immediate implant in esthetic zone . This study will assess outcomes such as keratinized tissue thickness, keratinized tissue width, pink esthetic score and radiographic buccal cortex thickness over a defined follow-up period. By comparing mVIP-CTG to XCM, the study seeks to determine which method provides superior clinical and aesthetic results for best soft tissue augmentation
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeThis study investigates two surgical techniques for managing peri-implant soft tissue deficiencies: the Modified Vascularized Interpositional Periosteal Connective Tissue Graft (VIP-CTG) and the Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix (XCM). Peri-implant soft tissue deficiencies, characterized by inadequate tissue volume or recession around dental implants, can lead to complications such as implant exposure, sensitivity, and aesthetic concerns. Conventional treatment methods aim to enhance soft tissue volume and improve the aesthetic and functional outcomes of implants.
The mVIP-CTG approach utilizes autogenous pedicle grafts to improve tissue thickness and width, potentially enhancing soft tissue integration and thickness around immediate implants. In contrast, XCM is a xenogenic membrane offering a minimally invasive alternative substitute for soft tissue regeneration.
The study design includes randomized assignment of participants to either the mVIP-CTG group or XCM group, with standardized surgical and follow-up protocols. Primary and secondary outcomes will include peri-implant soft tissue thickness, keratinized tissue width, pink esthetic score, and radiographic buccaal cortex thickness. Statistical analysis will evaluate the comparative effectiveness of both techniques in promoting peri-implant soft tissue regeneration and aesthetic recovery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-
Exclusion criteria
10 patients received mVIP-CTG
10 patients received XCM
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
measurement of Kertinized tissue thickness around implant using endodontic file
Time frame: baseline, 3 months and 6 months
measurement of keratinized tissue width using graduated UNC-15 Probe
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
measurement of buccal cortex thickness using CBCT
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
measurement of pink aesthetic using visual scale of pink asethetic score
Minia University
Other
Modified Vascularized Interpostional Periosteal Connective Tissue Graft Versus Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Implant in Esthetic Zone (Comparative Study)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07427706
Apgar Score, Behavior
Tarragona, Reus, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07368114
Bone Graft, Dental
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07184879
Dental, Dental Anxiety
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06426095
Dental, Dental Crown Preparation
Karachi, Pakistan
View Trial Details