Hacettepe university, pediatric dentistry
Ankara, Altindag, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Location contact
gizem erbas unverdi, assoc.prof.
CONTACT
gizem erbas unverdi, assoc.prof.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
sule sahin
CONTACT
sule sahin
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07100028
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological performance of stainless steel crowns using conventional and Hall technique on permanent molars
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified6 year–13 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, Altindag, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
gizem erbas unverdi, assoc.prof.
CONTACT
gizem erbas unverdi, assoc.prof.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
sule sahin
CONTACT
sule sahin
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Stainless Steel Crowns will be applied on two permanent molar teeth in a split mouth design. 96 patients will be included in the study. The teeth will be randomized into two groups according to the applying methods: 1) Traditional method 2) Hall technique.
Oral hygiene index (Green & Vermillion), Plaque index (Sillness & Löe), gingival health (Löe & Sillness), level of gingival margin, crown retention and success, wear, occlusion, clinical pulpal health (spontaneous pain, mucosal swelling/fistula presence, mobility, percussion/palpation tenderness) and radiographic pulpal health (periradicular/interradicular radiolucency, lamina dura loss, internal/external root resorption, pulp canal obliteration) will be evaluated and photographic records will be taken.
The evaluation of the restorations will be performed at baseline, and 1., 3., 6., 12., 18., 24. months. The measurement of vertical hight on occlusion will be performed before and immediate after the treatment, at 2 weeks and 1., 2. and 3.months.
Fisher's Exact test, Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves, Log-rank test, Mann Whitney U test, and Friedman test will be performed for the statistical analysis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
SSC crown placement using Hall technique
SSC placement using conventional technique
Time frame: 2 years
The primary outcome 'success' was defined as the "absence of major failure," a measure encompassing clinical and radiographic signs of irreversible pulpitis or infectious complications (spontaneous pain, pulp infection, or periradicular pathology, loss of lamina dura on radiographs).
Time frame: 2 years
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
gizem erbas unverdi, Dr.
CONTACT
sule sahin, research assistant
CONTACT
Hacettepe University
Other
Comparison of Hall Technique vs Conventional Technique in Permanent Teeth
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07725757
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
View Trial DetailsNCT07725133
Dental Caries, Pit and Fissure Sealant Retention
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07709247
Biomarkers, Bone Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07124533
Behavior, Consumer Behavior
Loma Linda, California, United States
View Trial Details