Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Dep. of Neurology Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen Munich, Germany
Munich, Bavaria, 80336, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04052958
For some diseases, regular respiratory muscle training could delay the start of ventilation. For DM1, however, there are no clinically high-quality studies. Only a case description from the year 2006 showed a missing improvement of the symptoms after respiratory muscle training in one patient, accordingly there are no recommendations in this issue. Within the scope of this monocentric, three-arm, controlled intervention study, 45 patients with genetically confirmed type 1 myotonic dystrophy will be randomized in three groups of 15 patients each, age-, gender- and symptom-corrected by the MUSCULAR IMPAIRMENT RATING SCALE (MIRS). The DM1 patients will receive regular respiratory muscle training for a period of 9 months. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of regular inspiratory strength-breathing muscle training on 15 patients, the safety and effectiveness of regular inspiratory endurance respiratory muscle training on 15 patients, and the comparison to the natural course in 15 patients without training. Subsequently, we will provide treatment recommendations for respiratory training in DM1.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Munich, Bavaria, 80336, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
respiratory strength or indurance training with respiratory therapy device
Time frame: nine months
Intervention-related (serious) adverse events will be assessed as described in protocoll DM-IMT Version 1.2 (26/June/2019). For example a deterioration of > 15% of the FVC compared to the baseline measurements is defined as AE, as is the development of unusual myalgia of the respiratory muscles for more than 12 hours after the respiratory training. Detailed lists of patients experiencing adverse events or SAEs are reported. The severity of the adverse event is classified as mild, moderate or severe. Relationships of an AE to the training are categorized as unassociated, unlikely to be associated, possibly associated or associated. A separate list will be provided for patients who drop out of the study due to AEs. The frequency of adverse events leading to study termination is also summarized. Safety parameters also include lung function tests (PFT, including FVC, FEV1, MIP, MEP), physical examination, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests as required.
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP).
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP).
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of Maximal exspiratory pressure (MEP).
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of Maximal exspiratory pressure (MEP).
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of Forced Vital capacity (FVC).
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of Forced Vital capacity (FVC).
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1).
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1).
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of pCO2 in capillary blood gas analysis.
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of pCO2 in capillary blood gas analysis.
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of pO2 in capillary blood gas analysis.
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of pO2 in capillary blood gas analysis.
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of pH in capillary blood gas analysis.
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of pH in capillary blood gas analysis.
Time frame: nine months
The efficacy of the respiratory training is determined by the results of 6-minute-walk-test.
Time frame: nine months
Impact on the quality of life and muscular performance in DM1 patients after recurrent respiratory muscle training will be measured by the result of DM1-ACTIV, a Rasch-built DM activity and participation scale for clinical use.
Time frame: nine months
Impact on the quality of life and muscular performance in DM1 patients after recurrent respiratory muscle training will be measured by the result of the FDSS - FATIGUE AND DAYTIME SLEEPINESS SCALE, a Rasch-built combined fatigue and daytime sleepiness scale specifically designed for patients with DM1.
Time frame: nine months
Impact on the quality of life and muscular performance in DM1 patients after recurrent respiratory muscle training will be measured by the result of the RESPICHECK, a questionnaire on clinical symptoms of respiratory insufficiency.
Time frame: nine months
Impact on the quality of life and muscular performance in DM1 patients after recurrent respiratory muscle training will be measured by the result of the physical examination.
Time frame: nine months
Impact on the quality of life and muscular performance in DM1 patients after recurrent respiratory muscle training will be measured by the result of the 6-minute-walk-test.
LMU Klinikum
Other
Acronym: DM-IMT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05027269
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, DM1
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06204809
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Genetic Diseases, Inborn
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05479981
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, DM1
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03424460
Cardiovascular Diseases, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
View Trial Details