Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02411396

Comparison of Patient Centered Outcomes for People With Sickle Cell Disease in the Acute Care Setting

The Emergency Department has been the standard location where patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) go to seek care for the treatment of acute painful events. Vaso- Occlusive Crisis (VOC) is the most common complication of SCD,

The purpose of this study is to compare patient centered outcomes for patients being treated for an uncomplicated VOC in Infusion Centers (IC) and Emergency Departments (ED) in four locations around the United States.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Sickle Cell Disease Anemia Anemia, Hemolytic Anemia, Hemolytic, Congenital Anemia, Sickle Cell Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities Genetic Diseases, Inborn Hematologic Diseases Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases Hemoglobinopathies

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Emergency Department care is marked by long delays, lack of efficacy, and conflict. A sub-specialty Infusion Center staffed by expert clinicians and delivering individualized care can improve care quality while reducing costs. The study will examine whether care provided in an Infusion Center (IC) is more patient centered and efficient than care provided in an Emergency Department (ED) for adults with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) and uncomplicated Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC).

Sites will prospectively enroll patients in VOC seen in participating centers from either the EDs or the ICs. Specific data from the acute visits (e.g. Times of arrival, time to first dose of analgesic, etc) will be captured. This study will compare: pain management, disposition of subjects (home or admission) and patient experiences of care delivery in both settings. Subjects will complete surveys/questionnaires to asses subjects' experiences in the setting where care was provided.

The four sites to participate in the study are Baltimore, Maryland (Johns Hopkins Hospital), Cleveland, Ohio (Cleveland Medical Center), Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Medical College of Wisconsin), and Baton Rouge, Louisiana (Our Lady of the Lake Hospital). A maximum of 500 subjects will participate in the study. Participants will be enrolled for 18 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed Sickle Cell Disease patients who live within 60 miles of the study center or who already receive regular care at the participating centers.

Exclusion criteria

  • Stable patients who have been on chronic transfusion therapy and have not had a painful episode within two years of enrollment.
  • Patients who are pregnant.
  • Patients who are unwilling or unable to sign consent.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Time (Minutes) From Arrival to Center to Time First Dose of Parenteral Pain Medication Administered

    Time frame: Within 6 hours after arrival

    Time is recorded from the time the patient arrives for pain treatment at either the ED or IC until the time the patient is dosed with pain medication administered parenterally. Guideline recommendations are that patients receive non-oral pain medication within 60 minutes of arrival.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disposition From Acute Care Visit

    Time frame: Day 1 of admission

    Odds for admission to the hospital versus discharge to home (ED vs IC)

  2. Pain Reassessment Within 30 Minutes of First Dose of Parenteral Pain Medication Administered

    Time frame: 30 minutes after administration

    Odds of being re-assessed for pain within 30 minutes of receiving first dose of pain medication in ED vs IC. NHLBI guidelines recommend that patients are re-assessed for adequacy of pain management 30 minutes after receiving pain medication.

  3. Patient Reported Satisfaction With Care Received

    Time frame: within 72 hours of acute visit

    Survey to capture patient satisfaction with the quality of care in either the ED or IC. Validated a new tool to assess satisfaction with care in the acute care setting. The new tool was developed based on existing tools that assessed several domains: adequacy of pain management, communication with providers, interpersonal aspects of care, provider competence, involvement of family/friends, and access to care. The final 15 item validated Patient Satisfaction with Pain Management in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) (PSPS) scale was used to compare satisfaction of care comparing ED to IC acute visits. Overall mean satisfaction scores ranged from 0-7 with higher scores signifying greater satisfaction

  4. Patient Reported Perception of Risk From Visit

    Time frame: within 72 hours of acute visit

    One question on the survey asked patients to rate the overall level of medical safety they felt during their visit to the ED or IC. Choices for responses: Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair or Poor. Excellent and Very Good were determined as having greater feelings of overall safety while patients who chose Good, Fair or Poor were determined having lesser feelings of overall safety.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) ESCAPED Study: Comparison of Patient Centered Outcomes for People With SCD in the Acute Care Setting

Acronym: ESCAPED

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Apr 8, 2015
Registry last updated
Jun 27, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.