Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06727513

A Two-Operator Technique for GlideScope-Assisted Endotracheal Intubation

The primary objective of this study is to compare the first attempt success rate of endotracheal intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope when performed by two operators versus a single operator.

Secondary objectives include assessing the time to intubate, the need for optimization maneuvers, the effect of the presence of predictors of difficult intubation, the occurrence of adverse events during intubation such as oxyhemoglobin desaturation to less than 90% measured by pulse oximetry, the incidence of airway trauma, and the incidence and severity of post-op sore throat. The main question it aims to answer is: Is endotracheal intubation performed using the Glidescope video laryngoscope with an intubating stylet by two operators, non-inferior to the same procedure performed by single operator in terms of first attempt success rate? Researchers will compare first attempt success rate of endotracheal intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope when performed by two operators versus a single operator to see if assistance in using the GlideScope provides similar first attempt success rate of endotracheal intubation and thus guarantees securing a difficult airway.

Participants will be enrolled in one of two groups over 9 months of work. They will be further stratified into blocks according to the presence of at least one predictor of difficult intubation. Patients allocated to the control group will be intubated using the GlideScope by a single operator and those allocated to the experimental group will be intubated using the GlideScope with the assistance of a second operator.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

American University of Beirut Medical Center

Beirut, Lebanon

About this study

GlideScope-assisted flexible fiberoptic intubation has been successfully used in cases of anticipated and unexpected difficult airways. This technique depends on two operators where the second operator assists in holding the GlideScope while intubation is being attempted by the first operator. However, it is not yet established whether this two-operator technique has any effect on the success rate of first-attempt intubation by the GlideScope video laryngoscope. The primary objective of this study is to compare the first attempt success rate of endotracheal intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope when performed by two operators versus a single operator.

Secondary objectives include assessing the time to intubate, the need for optimization maneuvers, the effect of the presence of predictors of difficult intubation, the occurrence of adverse events during intubation such as oxyhemoglobin desaturation to less than 90% measured by pulse oximetry, the incidence of airway trauma, and the incidence and severity of post-operative sore throat. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 428 patients (214 in each group) adult patients will be enrolled in one of two groups over 9 months of work. They will be further stratified into blocks according to the presence of at least one predictor of difficult intubation. Patients allocated to the control group will be intubated using the GlideScope by a single operator (the resident on the study). Those allocated to the experimental group will be intubated using the GlideScope with the assistance of a second operator (the resident and the attending physician). In both groups, the time to intubate will be measured by the attendings on the study, along with other parameters collected by the resident on the study. If intubation fails, the airway will be subsequently managed using any technique deemed appropriate by the attending anesthesiologist. Data comparing the success rate of endotracheal intubation when a second operator assists in holding the GlideScope is missing. This two-operator technique is essential in the new multimodal airway management involving video-assisted flexible fiberoptic intubation. Our study will determine whether the assistance in using the GlideScope provides similar first attempt success rate of endotracheal intubation and thus guarantees securing a difficult airway.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult population ≥ 18 years of age
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I to III
  • Elective procedures
  • Patients requiring orotracheal intubation with a single-lumen tube under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV or V
  • Emergency procedures
  • Patients who require awake or asleep fiberoptic intubation
  • Patients who require nasal intubation
  • Patients who require double-lumen endotracheal tube (ETT)
  • Patients who are already intubated
  • Patients who require rapid sequence induction (uncontrolled Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), hiatal hernia, full stomach)
  • Patients with an oropharyngeal/laryngeal pathology (tumor, abscess)
  • Patients with maxillary or mandibular fracture

Treatment and study plan

A single-operator technique for GlideScope intubation.

Procedure

A single-operator technique where the senior resident will insert the GlideScope and perform the endotracheal intubation using an angulated stylet.

A double-operator technique for GlideScope intubation

Procedure

A double-operator technique where the senior resident will insert the GlideScope until visualizing an optimal glottic view, then the attending physician will take over the GlideScope keeping it in the same fixed position, while the resident performs the endotracheal intubation using an angulated stylet.

Primary outcomes

  1. First attempt success rate of endotracheal intubation

    Time frame: Recorded during the procedure

    First attempt success rate of endotracheal intubation measured by Yes/No

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to intubate

    Time frame: Recorded during the procedure

    Time to intubate measured in seconds

  2. The need for optimization maneuvers

    Time frame: Recorded during the procedure

    The need for optimization maneuvers measured by Yes/No

  3. Occurrence of adverse events during intubation

    Time frame: Recorded during the procedure

    Occurrence of adverse events during intubation such as oxyhemoglobin desaturation to less than 90% measured by pulse oximetry

  4. The incidence of airway trauma

    Time frame: Recorded during the procedure

    The incidence of airway trauma measured by Yes/No

  5. Incidence and severity of post-operative sore throat

    Time frame: Post-operative sore throat measured one hour after transfer to post anesthesia care unit

    Incidence and severity of post-operative sore throat measured by Yes/No and low pain/high pain

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

American University of Beirut Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Two-Operator Technique for GlideScope-Assisted Endotracheal Intubation: Does It Yield a Similar Success Rate? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 11, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.