Ann-Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen
Kråkerøy, Østfold fylke, 1679, Norway
NCT Number: NCT05614609
Few studies have compared different methods for optimalizing intubation conditions in general anesthesia. This randomized controlled trial will compare two different methods for intubation in general anesthesia in gastro- or gynecological procedures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Kråkerøy, Østfold fylke, 1679, Norway
In general anesthesia, it is neccessary to secure the airways with an endotracheal tube. There is no international consensus on how intubation is most efficiently conducted. A cochrane review compared using muscular relaxing medication versus not using blocks for intubation. Primary outcomes were intubation conditions and discomfort in upper airways. The authors concluded that research is limited, and that further research is needed. No studies have compared local anesthetic spray on the glottis and muscular relaxing medication in intubation, focusing on discomfort in upper airways. The null-hypothesis of this study is that there is no difference in upper airway discomfort when using local anesthetic spray or muscular relaxing medication. The study will have a randomized controlled design, randomizing patients undergoing gastro- or gynecological procedures in general anesthesia to receiving either rocuronium (muscle relaxing medication) intravenous, or lidocain spray on the glottis before intubation. The primary outcome is postoperativ hoarseness one hour after intubation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparing lidocaine spray and muscle relaxing medication
Other names: Rocurinoum 0.6 mg/kg intravenous
Time frame: 1 hours
Scored on a scale : 0=no, 1= self reported hoarseness, 2=observed hoarsness by care personnel, 3=aphonia
Time frame: Before intubation
Cormack & Lehane four degrees
Time frame: At intubation
Number
Time frame: At intubation
bourgie, c-mac, other
Time frame: At intubation
yes/no
Time frame: At intubation
yes/no
Time frame: at intubation
Blood pressure before and 2 minutes after intubation
Time frame: at intubation
Heart rate before and 2 minutes after intubation
Time frame: At extubation
yes/no
Time frame: At extubation
yes/no
Time frame: 2-48 hours
Scored on a scale : 0=no, 1= self reported hoarseness, 2=observed hoarsness by care personnel, 3=aphonia
Time frame: 2-48 hours
0=no, 1=mild, 2=moderate, constant pain when swallowing, 3=severe pain needing analgesia
Ostfold University College
Other
Discomfort in Upper Airways Due to intubation-a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Norwegian Hospital
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07719933
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03972423
Anesthesia, Anesthesia Complication
Versailles, IDF, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04774354
Pathologic Processes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05379205
Behavior, Colon Cancer
Granada, Andalusia, Spain
View Trial Details