Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05433155

Nasotracheal Intubation With VL vs DL in Infants Trial

Nasotracheal Intubation with Videolaryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Infants (NasoVISI) Trial is a prospective randomized multicenter study. The study will be conducted at 8 centers in the United States. It is expected that approximately 700 subjects enrolled to product 670 evaluable subjects.The randomization is 1:1 naso tracheal intubation with the Storz C-Mac Video Videolaryngoscopy (VL) or the Standard Direct Laryngoscope (DL). The primary objective is to compare the nasotracheal intubation (NTI) first attempt success rate using VL vs. DL in infants 0-365 days of age presenting for cardiothoracic surgery and cardiac catheterizations.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 day–365 day

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The primary objectives of the study are to compare the nasotracheal intubation (NTI) first attempt success rate using VL vs. DL in infants 0-365 days of age presenting for cardiothoracic surgery and cardiac catheterizations.

Secondary Objectives include the number of attempts for successful intubation; Incidence of failed NTI (conversion to oral intubation); Incidence of failure to intubate with assigned device; Incidence of complications over all attempts including non-severe and severe complications; Incidence of 1st-attempt complications; Need for cricoid pressure or external laryngeal manipulation, need for adjunct- (Magill forceps), rescue of one technique of the other, Percent of glottic opening (POGO) score less than 100%, intubation sequence exceeding 60 seconds and interaction analysis of weight group (i.e. ≤ median weight & > median weight (kg)), and by clinicians' experience with cardiac anesthesiology (i.e. Permanent full time team members & rotating team members) on the association between treatment and outcomes

Study Design: this is a prospective, randomized, multi-center parallel group trial

Setting/Participants: This will be a multi-center study. The target population will be infants 0-365 days of age scheduled for elective cardiothoracic surgery or cardiac catheterization requiring general anesthesia with NTI.

Study Interventions and Measures: The study intervention will be a 1:1 randomization to perform tracheal intubation with the Storz C-Mac Video Videolaryngoscopy (VL) or the Standard Direct Laryngoscope (DL).

Main study outcome measures are as follows:

  • The first intubation attempt success rate with each device
  • The number of attempts for successful intubation with each device
  • Complications associated with intubation

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males or females age 0 -365 days
  • Scheduled for elective cardiothoracic surgery or cardiac catheterization procedures lasting longer than 30 minutes under general anesthesia where nasotracheal intubation will be performed by an anesthesiology clinician
  • Plan to use a neuromuscular blocking drug prior to intubation as standard of care
  • Parental/guardian permission (informed consent)

For clinician participants:

  • Anesthesia attending, anesthesia fellows, anesthesia resident, Anesthesia Assistant (AA) or CRNA

Exclusion criteria

  • Less than 36 weeks gestation
  • Less than 2 kg
  • History of difficult intubation
  • History of abnormal airway
  • Predictive of difficult intubation upon physical examination
  • Preoperative endotracheal tube or tracheostomy
  • Emergency cases

Treatment and study plan

Nasotracheal intubation

Device

Nontracheal intubation using clinical standard videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy

Primary outcomes

  1. VL first attempt success rate

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Direct observation of intubation in the OR and medical record review

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of attempts for successful intubation

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Direct observation of intubation in the OR and medical record review

  2. Incidence of failed NTI (conversion to oral intubation)

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Direct observation of intubation in the OR and medical record review

  3. Incidence of failure to intubate with assigned device

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Direct observation of intubation in the OR and medical record review

  4. Incidence of complications over all attempts including non-severe and severe complications

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Direct observation of intubation in the OR and medical record review

  5. Incidence of 1st-attempt complications

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Direct observation of intubation in the OR and medical record review

  6. Incidence of additional techniques

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Direct observation of intubation in the OR and medical record review

  7. Interaction analysis of weight group and by clinicians' experience with cardiac anesthesiology on the association between treatment and outcomes

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Direct observation of intubation in the OR and medical record review

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Other

Collaborators

  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas
  • Children's National Research Institute
  • Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas
  • Seattle Children's Hospital
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Registry information

Official study title

Nasotracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Infants (NasoVISI) Trial

Acronym: NasoVISI

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jun 27, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 28, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.