McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
NCT Number: NCT03098797
A randomized, double-blind cross over trial to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of elamipretide in subjects with Barth syndrome.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous injections of elamipretide in subjects with genetically confirmed Barth syndrome followed by open-label treatment extension. Part 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy single daily subcutaneous (SC) doses of 40 mg elamipretide administered for 12 weeks in subjects with Barth syndrome. Part 2: This was an open-label extension trial to assess the long-term safety, tolerability, and longitudinal trends in efficacy single daily SC doses of 40 mg elamipretide for up to 192 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
40 mg daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks
Other names: MTP-131
daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks
Other names: Placebo Comparator
Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
Average distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at end of treatment, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Time frame: Pre-dose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment)
Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit at predose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment). The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0 to 4-point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome. Combined Min score=0, max score =12. Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods. Results from each 12-week period were combined, where end of treatment for Period 1 =Visit 5 (week 12), and End of Period 2 = Visit 10 (week 12)
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192
Change from baseline for distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) by visit where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
Change from Baseline (mean) in Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit. The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0-4 point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects by visit; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome. Change from baseline: an increase in scores would mean worse outcome, a decrease in scores means better outcome. Combined Min score=-12, max score =12. Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods. Baseline= Period 1 Predose.
Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period. Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192
Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons. Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs. Change from baseline where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose: the greater positive change, the better the outcome, the smaller positive change (or negative change) the number the worse the outcome.
Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
Time (in seconds) to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192
Change in baseline in time (in seconds), where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand by visit. More time means worse outcome, less time means better outcome.
Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
SWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability from Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment), where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192
Change from Baseline: SWAY Application Balance Assessment,where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-doseSWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability. An increase from baseline is a better outcome and a decrease in score is a worse outcome.
Time frame: Pre-dose, Week 1, Week 12 (end of treatment)
Patient-reported health status over the past week, by visit, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period. Scores range from 0-40 for adolescents and 0-50 for adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, and 4=Very Severe. Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
Part 2: Change from Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by Visit Patient-reported health status over the past week where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-40 for adolescents and 0-50 for adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very Severe. Change from baseline: Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
Clinician Global Impression Scale by visit: Clinician-reported overall health status at end of treatment, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-6 for both adolescents and adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 1= Very much Better, 2= Moderately Better, 3= A Little Better, 4= No Change, and 5= A Little Worse 6= Very much Worse. Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome. End of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
Change from Baseline: CGI Symptom Scale by visit where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose. Clinician Global Impression Scale: Clinician-reported overall health status at end of treatment, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-6 for both adolescents and adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 1= Very much Better, 2= Moderately Better, 3= A Little Better, 4= No Change, and 5= A Little Worse 6= Very much Worse. Change from baseline: higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.
Industry
A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Injections of Elamipretide in Subjects With Genetically Confirmed Barth Syndrome Followed by Open-Label Treatment
Acronym: TAZPOWER
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01625663
Abnormalities, Multiple, Barth Syndrome
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01629459
Abnormalities, Multiple, Barth Syndrome
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01194141
Abnormalities, Multiple, Barth Syndrome
View Trial DetailsNCT07531251
Abnormalities, Multiple, Barth Syndrome
Needham, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details