UCSD Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
NCT Number: NCT02213510
ZipLine Medical, Inc. has developed a novel, non-invasive skin closure device called "Zip Surgical Skin Closure" to replace sutures, staples and glue for closure of the skin layer for surgical incisions or laceration repair. The study will be comparing the Zip Surgical Skin Closure to standard sutures in patients undergoing cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures on outcomes including closure time, cosmetic appearance of resulting scar, and overall cosmetic appearance of scar. The study will be following participants for 3 months following CIED procedure.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
ZipLine Medical, Inc. has developed a novel, non-invasive skin closure device called "Zip Surgical Skin Closure" to replace sutures, staples and glue for closure of the skin layer for surgical incisions or laceration repair. The device is designed to provide closure speed superior to sutures, while resulting in a suture-like cosmetic outcome.The ZIPS study is a randomized, clinical trial comparing outcomes of procedures that use the Zip Surgical Skin Closure device with the outcomes of procedures that use stitches. The Zip Surgical Skin Closure is not an investigational device and is currently used in hospital across the United States. The Zip Surgical Skin Closure is a non-invasive (in other words, does not pierce the skin or enter into the wound) device to hold skin closed while healing can occur. It adheres to the skin close to the incision and uses adjustable straps to hold the incision closed. It is typically worn on the skin for 7-14 days and is removed by peeling from the skin. Patients will be randomized to either Zip Surgical Skin Closure or sutures, in addition to dissolvable sutures for the deeper layers, for surgical procedures for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) i.e. pacemakers or defibrillators. Both of these closure techniques are considered standard of care at this facility and are not themselves experimental. However, the goal of this experimental study is to see if there are any significant differences between the two closure methods, in a controlled study environment.
Since the Zip Surgical Skin Closure device is relatively new to the market, there is a limited amount of information available describing the experience of patients and doctors using the device. In this study, the investigators will be looking to compare the Zip Surgical Skin Closure and stitches methods for the time necessary for the surgeon to close the incision, cosmetic appearance of the resulting scar, and satisfaction of you and your surgeon. The investigators will also be monitoring both study groups for occurrence of any adverse (unfavorable) events. Patients will be followed for a total of 3 months for this study. All study visits align with standard of care follow up for post-implantation of CIED. Non-identifiable pictures will be obtained of the scar during follow up and both patients and surgeons will complete questionnaires indicating their experience and satisfaction with the either skin closure method.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Zip Surgical Skin Closure device is a single use, sterile medical device that replaces sutures, staples, and glue for closure of the skin layer for surgical incisions or laceration repair. The device will applied by the surgeon at the end of the CIED procedure and be worn until the two week post-operative wound check.
Other names: Wound closure device
The surgeon will perform standard suture closure for the skin layer following CIED procedure.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Duration of time starting when suture needle (control) or Zip device touches the skin until final suture knot is cut or Zip device application is complete (e.g., top liner is removed.)
Time frame: 3 Months
Based on photographs taken of scars taken at 3 months following CIED procedure. The CVAS scale is measured from 0mm (representing best scar) to 100 mm (representing worst scar).
Time frame: 2 weeks
At 2 weeks post-procedure, the Wound Evaluation Scale was measured. The scale is based from 0 (representing normal skin) to 100 (representing a poor scar).
Time frame: 3 Months
The surgeon will complete an assessment of the following:
Scale rated on 1 (least favorable) to 6 (most favorable)
Please note that only 18 patients were evaluated (of 19) in the Standard Suture Closure due to one patient withdrawing from the trial.
Time frame: 3 months
At 3 months post-procedure, the surgeon evaluated their satisfaction on a scale from 1 to 5, 5 being the least favorable.
Please note that only 18 patients were evaluated (of 19) in the Standard Suture Closure due to one patient withdrawing from the trial.
Time frame: 2 weeks
At 2 weeks post-procedure, patient comfort was evaluated with a scale 1 (most favorable) to 5 (least favorable).
Time frame: 3 months
Patient will complete questionnaires that includes assessments of the following:
Scar Satisfaction was measured on a scale from 1 (most satisfied) to 5 (least satisfied)
Please note that only 18 patients were evaluated (of 19) in the Standard Suture Closure due to one patient withdrawing from the trial.
Time frame: 3 months
At 3 months post-procedure, patients were asked to rate their scar. Scale was measured from 0 (best scar) - 10 (worst scar)
Please note that only 18 patients were evaluated (of 19) in the Standard Suture Closure due to one patient withdrawing from the trial.
Time frame: 1 day (discharge)
At the discharge visit, patients evaluated their level of pain at the incision site based on a scale 1 (least pain) through 10 (worst pain).
Time frame: 2 weeks
At 2 week post-procedure, incision pain was evaluated on a scale 0 to 10 (worst pain).
Time frame: 3 months
Incision pain experienced by the patient was evaluated at 3 months post-procedure. This was evaluated on a scale of 0 (least pain) to 10 (worst pain).
University of California, San Diego
Other
A Prospective, Non-blinded, Randomized Controlled Post-market Study Designed to Compare the Use of the Zip Surgical Skin Closure Device Versus Conventional Sutures for Skin Closure in Subjects Who Undergo a CIED Procedure.
Acronym: ZIPS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05741866
Cardiovascular Diseases, Catheter Complications
Herston, Queensland, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT05903547
Cesarean Section, Complication
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06388980
Behavior, Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06569238
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details