Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NYP
New York, 10032, United States
NCT Number: NCT05903547
The aim of this study is to compare cesarean incision outcomes between patients with incision closed with the Dermabond Prineo system compared to standard subcuticular suture.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
New York, 10032, United States
The purpose of this study is to assess patient satisfaction with their incision after undergoing cesarean delivery. Patient satisfaction with their cesarean scar at 4-6 weeks after their surgery will be compared amongst women receiving skin closure with the Dermabond Prineo skin adhesive system versus standard subcuticular suture. Dermabond Prineo has been shown to have improved cosmesis outcomes in non-obstetric populations but has not yet been studied for women receiving cesarean section. In addition to scar appearance, outcomes such as wound infection, postoperative pain, and operative time will be assessed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For subjects in the Dermabond Prineo group, the Dermabond Prineo system will be applied to the skin for skin closure under manufacturer's guidelines.
For subjects in the Suture group, the skin will be closed with the standard subcuticular suture method.
Time frame: Assessed at 6-weeks postpartum
The patient's satisfaction with their cesarean incision will be assessed using the validated Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) questionnaire. The PSAS is a 6-item questionnaire that is scored on a 1 (no complaints/as normal skin) to 10 (worst imaginable/very different from normal skin) scale. Total scores range from 6-60, with a lower score indicating a greater level of patient satisfaction.
Time frame: Assessed during delivery hospitalization and at 6-week follow-up
A composite of surgical site infection (SSI) will be assessed. This composite will include superficial and deep SSI, endometritis, wound separation from any cause, and/or fascial dehiscence.
Time frame: Intraoperative
The skin closure time will be assessed.
Time frame: Intraoperative
The total operative time will be assessed.
Columbia University
Other
Glue Versus Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Closure: a Randomized Control Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06558240
Cesarean Section, Genital Diseases
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT02531828
Cesarean Section, Rupture
Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT02962011
Cesarean Section, Surgical Wound
Safed, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT07334418
Cesarean Section, Delivery; Trauma
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details