Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06672627

Trueness of Digital Occlusal Analysis

The aims of this observational study are to evaluate the trueness of two different digital occlusal analyzers; handheld occlusal analyzer versus intraoral scanner in comparison to conventional methods in identifying true occlusal contacts and to evaluate inter-examiner reliability of two examiners independently analyzing occlusal contacts.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt

Alexandria, Egypt

About this study

Evaluate the trueness of two different digital occlusal analyzers; handheld occlusal analyzer (occlusense) versus intraoral scanner (Medit i700-medit occlusal analyzer) in comparison to conventional methods (8 um articulating paper) in identifying true occlusal contacts and to evaluate inter-examiner reliability of two examiners independently analyzing occlusal contacts.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Normal occlusion (Angle Class 1)
  • No missing teeth
  • No tempromandibular disorders

Exclusion criteria

Patients having:

  • Dental prostheses
  • Extensive restorations
  • Severe malocclusion
  • Periodontal disease
  • Excessive tooth wear
  • Orofacial pain
  • Temporomandibular joint disorders
  • Anterior or posterior open bite
  • Active orthodontic treatment.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of trueness

    Time frame: 4 months

    Trueness is defined as the closeness of the measurement to the real size of an object. The trueness of handheld occlusal analyzers (occlusense) versus intraoral scanners (medit occlusal analyzer) will be evaluated in comparison to conventional methods (8 um articulating paper).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inter-examiner reliability

    Time frame: 4 months

    Two examiners will record independently the interocclusal contacts for all the different groups, classifying them in a dichotomy variable (yes/no) contact or not per tooth. Then, the inter-examiner's reliability will be calculated.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alexandria University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Trueness of Digital Occlusal Analysis Using Handheld Device Versus Intraoral Scanner (A Diagnostic Evaluative Clinical Study)

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Nov 4, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.