Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Giza, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05471024
Regardless of the fabrication workflow occlusal adjustments seem to be inevitable during delivery of indirect fabrication of the restoration. This has been attributed to snowballing of discrepancies due to multiple procedures for information transfer between the clinician and the laboratory. Current digital workflows minimize these discrepancies due to digital acquisition technology which eliminates drawbacks from physical materials which would alter the dimensions and morphology of the final restoration. Utilizing 3D face scanning technology is by far the least invasive and the least time consuming of available virtual facebow techniques and thus it's utilization could offer the benefit of saving time during occlusal adjustment and enhanced strength of the restoration by not subjecting it to the heat generation and subsequent crack initiation which occurs during occlusal adjustment. This study aims to compare the effect of a face scan to alignment of the maxillary cast on the volume and time of occlusal adjustment compared to conventional articulator digitization to align the maxillary cast.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Giza, Egypt
This study will be carried out on participants enrolled at the outpatient fixed prosthodontics clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
Digital face scanning technology has made it possible to align the maxillary cast in a virtual articulator to represent a more accurate relationship to the terminal hinge axis of the patient than average positioning on a virtual Bonwill triangle. This would be reflected on the occlusal design of the restoration and subsequently on the amount of adjustment needed to the occlusal surface of the restoration during delivery. Decreasing the amount and time of occlusal adjustment would result in a decrease in chair time, increase in the longevity of the restoration and enhanced esthetics of the restoration.
Conventional alignment and mounting of casts to simulate the patients' dynamic occlusions remains the gold standard to which newer digital cast alignment and relation technology is to be compared. Thus the selection of the articulator scan as the comparator was made
Participants' Timeline
Clinical Visit 1 Preoperative records Clinical examination, Radiographic examination, Assessment of inclusion, Informed consent, Intraoral photographs, Primary impression (irreversible hydrocolloid) for diagnostic cast fabrication.
Clinical Visit 2 Facebow record, Articulator mounting, Face Scan, Foundation restoration for participant tooth built to full contour.
Clinical Visit 3 Preparation, Impression, Provisionalisation,
Allocation Impartial third party randomly allocates jaw relation methods to participants and informs laboratory technician of allocation results.
Single unit fixed prosthesis will be fabricated as per allocation results
Clinical Visit 4 Checking and verification of restoration ensuring
Impression prior to occlusal adjustment, Occlusal adjustment, Timing occlusal adjustment procedure, Impression after occlusal adjustment, Cementation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Conventional articulator facebow mounting will be digitized using extraoral digital 3d scanner and used to position the maxillary cast on the virtual articulator. This positioning will be utilized during design of the occlusal surface of the restoration.
Virtual Bonwill triangle will be used to position the maxillary cast on the virtual articulator.
This positioning will be utilized during design of the occlusal surface of the restoration.
Digital face scan will be used to position the maxillary cast on the virtual articulator.
This positioning will be utilized during design of the occlusal surface of the restoration.
Time frame: Immediately after verification of restoration acceptability but prior to occlusal adjustment. Time will be measured until occlusal contacts of the crown have been harmonized during the delivery clinical visit.
Time taken to harmonize occlusal contacts with participants masticatory function during delivery of the crown.Measured in minutes and seconds.
Time frame: Before and immediately after the occlusal adjustment. Volume before occlusal adjustment - volume after occlusal adjustment of the of the crown = volume difference
Amount of material removed from occlusal surface of restoration to harmonize occlusal contacts during delivery of the crown with participants masticatory function.
Cairo University
Other
Intraoral Occlusal Adjustment Time and Volume Required for Single Unit Fixed Prosthesis Fabricated With Different Virtual Articulator Mounting Methods (a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06272474
Bites and Stings, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05083715
Bites and Stings, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Belgrade, Serbia
View Trial DetailsNCT04798729
Bites and Stings, Centric Occlusion
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07530835
Bites and Stings, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Ankara, Keçiören, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details