Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03381521

The Volume Effect of Nerve Hydrodissection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy with involving compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. Although many conservative managements of CTS, the effectiveness of these methods is insignificant or only persist for a short duration. The technique of nerve hydrodissection is now commonly used for peeling the nerve from surrounding soft tissue, which may help allow the impulse to pass, and rescue the nerve with ischemic damage. However, the exact effect and interval of hydrodissection are unknown because of the lack of well-designed studies Hence, investigators design a randomized, double- blind, controlled trail to assess the therapeutic effect of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection in patients with CTS.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital

Taipei, Neihu District, 886, Taiwan

About this study

After obtaining written informed consent, patients clinically diagnosed with mild-to-moderate CTS were inclused and randomized into three groups. Group A, patients received one-session of ultrasoung-guided nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline; Group B, patients received one-session of ultrasoung-guided nerve hydrodissection with 5cc normal saline; The injection syringe was covered to obscure the nature of its contents and patients were asked to turn their head away so that they would not see the procedure. As a result, patients were blinded to the treatment condition. The primary outcome is Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) and secondary outcomes include visual analog scale (VAS), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve, sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve, and global assessment of treatment. The evaluations were performed pretreatment as well as on the 2nd week, 1st, 3rd and 6th month after injecton.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 20-80 year-old.
  • Diagnosis was confirmed using an electrophysiological study

Exclusion criteria

  • Cancer
  • Coagulopathy
  • Pregnancy
  • Inflammation status
  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy
  • Thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Previously undergone wrist surgery or steroid injection for CTS

Treatment and study plan

Ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection

Procedure

Ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline between carpal tunnel and median nerve.

Ultrasound

Device

The ultrasound was used to measure cross-sectional area and injection guidance

normal saline

Drug

The normal saline was used for injection solution

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline of severity of symptoms and functional status on 2nd week, 1st, 3rd and 6th month after injection

    Time frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 3rd and 6th month after injection

    Using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) to measure the severity of symptoms and functional status before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment. BCTQ includes two subscale (11 questions in symptom severity and 8 questions in functional status). The scores ranged from 0 to 5 points in each question, in which zero score refered to as mildest and no difficulty in activity; five scores mean most worst severity and dysfunction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline of pain on 2nd week, 1st, 3rd and 6th month after injection

    Time frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 3rd and 6th month after injection

    Using the Visual analog scale (VAS) to measure the pain scale before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment. The VAS score range from 10 (tremendously harsh pain) to 0 points (no pain)

  2. Change from baseline of cross-sectional area of the median nerve on 2nd week, 1st, 3rd and 6th month after injection

    Time frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 3rd and 6th month after injection

    Using the musculoskeletal sonogram to measure the cross-sectional area of the median nerve before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.

  3. Change from baseline of conduction velocity, amplitude of median nerve on 2nd week, 1st, 3rd and 6th month after injection

    Time frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd week, 1st, 3rd and 6th month after injection

    Antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH)

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Clinical Volume Effect of Nerve Hydrodissection in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Dec 22, 2017
Registry last updated
Jan 13, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.