Reference Center of Rare Disease with Intellectual Disability in Lyon, Woman Mother and Child Hospital, University Hospital of Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Bron, 69500, France
NCT Number: NCT07434037
This project studies the neurocognitive basis of trust adjustment in intellectual disability (ID), a source of significant vulnerability for these patients, focusing on two target populations chosen for their specific social characteristics: people with Down syndrome, who are often described as being hypersocial, and people with Fragile X syndrome, who are often characterized by a completely opposite social behaviour profile, with a withdrawn attitude and significant social anxiety.
The three different types of mechanisms that contribute to the adjustment of interpersonal trust: affective evaluation, trait attribution, and epistemic evaluation of informants, will be studied. Affective evaluation processes recruit subcortical structures such as the amygdala and assess potential social threats in the environment. The second mechanism for selecting whom to trust consists of forming a representation of a person's dispositions, such as benevolence and competence (also known as traits), and using it to predict that person's future behaviour. Trait attribution processes recruit a cortico-cerebellar network comprising the mPFC, CRUS I and posterior lobule VI. The third mechanism, called epistemic vigilance, allows to adjust our trust in what others communicate to us. This mechanism involves linking the assessment of the reliability of individuals who communicate (based on their benevolence and competence) with the reliability of the communicated information. Epistemic assessment involves frontal areas and areas associated with the representation of mental states in order to enable the evaluation of the truthfulness of the communicated information. All of these mechanisms become functional very early on, before a child's sixth birthday. There are reasons to expect that several of these central mechanisms supporting selective trust will behave atypically in intellectual disability.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified3 year–29 year
All sexes
Observational
Bron, 69500, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Group of Down Syndrom patients
Group of X-Fragile Syndrome
Group of chronological age-matched control
Group of mental age-matched control
Exclusion criteria
Groups of Down Syndrom and X-Fragiles patients
Regarding the neuroimaging (MRI) study:
Groups of typical development persons (chronological age-matched and mental age-matched)
Regarding the neuroimaging (MRI) study (only for chronological age-matched group):
Interpersonal trust assessment including a series of behavioural and eye-tracking studies (Paradigm 1 : Forming impressions using facial cues; Paradigm 2 : Forming impressions using behaviors) and assessment of epistemic trust (Paradigm 3 : assessing informants, Paradigm 4 : vigilance towards deception), will be performed at visit V1.
Clinical assessment including Medical history, developmental trajectory, epilepsy history, clinical examination, presence of autism spectrum disorder, presence of cardiopathy, will be performed at visit V1.
Cognitive assessment including Raven Matrix, Wechsler Scale (WISC-V or WAIS IV), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale II, PPVT5, EVT3, will be performed at visit V1.
Executive function assessment including Laby 5-12 test, day/night Test, Questionnaire BRIEF-2, will be performed at visit V1.
Sociability assessment including Social Responsiveness Scale 2, Revised Preschool Anxiety Scale, two eye-tracking tasks (social scenes and social preference), Perception bias task, Distance adjustment task, Social motivation tasks, Examiner's assistance task, will be performed at visit V1.
Optional brain MRI acquisition (structural and functional) will be performed at ancillary visit
Time frame: Day 1
Paradigm 1 /Facial trait assessment : Error rates for each condition (3 levels of difficulty) and 2 types of questions (traits/behaviours) Paradigm 2 / Behaviour assessment: Error rates for each of the three conditions (traits-to-behaviour, behaviour-to-traits, and behaviour-to-behaviour) Paradigm 3/ Assessing informants : error rates for each type of informant Paradigm 4 / Vigilance towards deception: Error rates concerning the location of the pompom, for each of the four conditions: baseline, benevolence, malicious intent, and explicit falsehood of the character.
Time frame: Day 1
Paradigm 1 / Facial trait assessment: Analysis of response times (in milliseconds) for each condition (3 levels of difficulty (easy/moderate/difficult) and 2 types of questions (traits/behaviours) obtained using Presentation® software.
Paradigm 2 / Behaviour assessment: Analysis of response times (in milliseconds) for each of the three conditions (traits-to-behaviour, behaviour-to-traits, and behaviour-to-behaviour) using Presentation software.
Time frame: Day 1
Paradigm1 / Facial trait assessment: Observation time on different areas of interest (AOI eyes, AOI nose-mouth) obtained using the eye tracker (Tobii ProLab).
Paradigm 2 / Behaviour assessment: measurement of time spent on each region of interest corresponding to the task images (in milliseconds) obtained using the eye tracker (Tobii ProLab)
Time frame: Day 1
Data from clinical examination and medical file
Time frame: Day 1
Time frame: Day 1
Cognitive assessment
Time frame: Day 1
Data from clinical examination and medical file
Time frame: Day 1
Data from clinical examination and medical file
Time frame: Day 1
Cognitive assessment assessing the intelligence quotient of the participant. Intellectually disabled patients have an IQ below 70.
Time frame: Day 1
Adaptive assessment based on interview with the parents of the patient. A score below 70 is considered as impaired.
Time frame: Day 1
Language assessment. These two tests allow the assessment of receptive and expressive language level (lexical age).
Time frame: Day 1
Executive function assessment (planification) - The Z-score is used to assess a child's performance in relation to that of a normative group. A Z-score < -2 means a clinically relevant impairment
Time frame: Day 1
Executive function assessment (inhibition) A score ≤ 8 indicates a weak performance and a potential weakness in executive functions
Time frame: Day 1
Executive function assessment A T-score > 65 means clinically relevant executive difficulties.
Time frame: Day 1
Sociability assessment A T-score > 76 indicates severe social difficulties.
Time frame: Day 1
Sociability assessment A score above 70 indicates a severe social anxiety.
Time frame: Day 1
Sociability assessment
Time frame: Day 1
Sociability assessment
Time frame: Day 1
Sociability assessment
Time frame: Day 1
Sociability assessment
Time frame: Day 1
Sociability assessment The score is determined according to the distance at which the participant sits compared to the position of the unknown person
Time frame: Day 1
Sociability assessment
Time frame: Day 1
Sociability assessment The score will reflect if the participant does it spontaneously, or only one suggested, or only once explicitly mentioned or not al all.
Time frame: Day 2
Time frame: Day 2
Neuroimaging analysis. Brain volume and surfacic analysis will be performed using the Freesurfer software, allowing to compare between the 3 groups of participants (Fragile X, DS and controls).
Time frame: Day 2
Neuroimaging diffusion data analysis.
Time frame: Day 2
Neuroimaging functional MRI analysis. The BOLD signal reflects local and transient variations in the amount of oxygen carried by haemoglobin as a function of neuronal activity in the brain. fMRI data will be analyzed using FSL software.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Other
The Neurocognitive Bases of Trust in Intellectual Disability: Affective Evaluation, Trait Attribution, and Epistemic Vigilance
Acronym: BNConfDI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07493096
22q11 Deletion Syndrome, 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
The Woodlands, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07658053
Abnormalities, Multiple, Apnea
Bron, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06911944
Abnormalities, Multiple, Alzheimer Disease
View Trial DetailsNCT07047963
Abnormalities, Multiple, Alzheimer Disease
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Grand Est, France
View Trial Details