Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03723304

The Intention-to-treat Effect of Bridge Therapies in the Setting of Milan-in Patients

In patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) meeting the Milan Criteria (MC), the usefulness of loco-regional therapies (LRT) in the context of liver transplantation (LT) is still debated. The inconsistent literature data are the result of initial selection biases among treated and untreated patients. In order to overcome these shortcomings, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was done in a large patient cohort. After using a competing-risk analysis, the primary end-point of the study aims at identifying the risk factors of HCC-specific LT failure, defined as pre-LT tumour-related drop-out or post-LT recurrence.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

UCL

Brussels, Belgium

About this study

Liver transplantation (LT) is the best curative treatment of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) developed in an underlying liver disease. LT is considered as an oncologic successful procedure when a long-term post-transplant tumour-free survival is obtained. Conversely, a failure is equal to pre-transplant drop-out, post-transplant tumour recurrence or death. Due to the allograft scarcity, a HCC patient waiting for a LT is most often treated using neo-adjuvant loco-regional therapies (LRT) in order to minimise the risk of drop-out. When the tumour burden meets the Milan Criteria (MC) at moment of diagnosis, such an approach is called "bridging towards LT".

Two recent international guidelines underlined the importance of the bridging strategy, due to its potential to reduce the risk of pre-LT drop-out and post-LT recurrence. This is especially valid in the case in which a partial/complete tumour response is achieved before LT. Unfortunately, the quality of the evidence obtained from the currently available literature is low due to the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCT). Actually, it is inconceivable to realize RCT in this setting because of logistical and, even more, ethical reasons. Consequently, the majority of reported studies just compare post-LT outcome of treated and untreated patients, failing thereby to analyse the clinical course from an intention-to-treat (ITT) point of view.

Even when looking at studies including the waiting list period, one should keep in mind that substantial differences may exist among initially bridged vs untreated HCC patients regarding tumour burden. In order to overcome these limits, a retrospective analysis of a large European population of MC-IN HCC patients listed for LT was done. After "balancing" this cohort with an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), we investigated the risk factors for tumour-specific LT failure, especially focusing at the role of LRT.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adults (≥18-year old) listed for liver transplant with a morphologic and/or histologic confirmed hepatocellular cancer

Exclusion criteria

  • Milan Criteria-out status at first referral
  • transplantation or de-listing before January 1, 2001
  • other means of loco-regional treatments such as partial hepatectomy, trans-arterial radio-embolization or external radiotherapy
  • misdiagnosed mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocellular cancer or cholangiocellular cancer

Treatment and study plan

Bridging followed by transplant

Procedure

Trans-arterial chemoembolization or percutaneous alcohol injection or radio-frequency ablation during the waiting time followed by liver transplant

Direct liver transplant

Procedure

Direct liver transplant (no neoadjuvant approaches during the waiting time period)

Primary outcomes

  1. Tumour-specific liver transplant failure rate

    Time frame: up to 5 years from first referral

    Any case of tumor-related drop-out during the waiting list period or post-transplant recurrence

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

European Hepatocellular Cancer Liver Transplant Group

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Intention-to-treat Effect of Bridging Therapies in the Setting of Milan-in Patients Waiting for Liver Transplantation

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Oct 29, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 29, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.