Standard microcatheter
DeviceSmall device used for mapping as part of radioembolization procedure
NCT Number: NCT05128032
The purpose of the study is to determine if the type of catheter used in the mapping procedure prior to radioembolization improves the delivery of radioactivity to tumor(s) in participants with liver cancer.
The name of the devices involved in this study are:
* Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD)/TriNav Infusion System * Standard 2.4F microcatheter, not otherwise specified
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center, investigator-initiated study to determine if the type of catheter used to deliver the radiotracer in the mapping procedure improves the delivery of radioactive microspheres during radioembolization treatment for liver cancer.
Both catheters being used, the Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD)/TriNav Infusion System and theStandard 2.4F microcatheter have been cleared for clinical use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Radioembolization for the treatment of liver tumors typically requires 2 separate procedures. The first procedure is called the mapping procedure. During the mapping procedure, the blood supply to the liver and tumor are evaluated with a type of x-ray called angiography. Once the optimal catheter position is determined for treatment, a "simulation" run is performed with the injection of a fluid that acts like the radiation that will be delivered to treat the tumors. This fluid is called a radiotracer. The study is looking to learn if the Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery device increases the ratio of radiotracer delivered to liver tumor tissue relative to normal liver tissue compared to a standard microcatheter. An improved delivery of radiotracer may indicate improved delivery of radioactive microspheres which may lead to improved tumor response rates and less liver toxicity
The research study procedures include assessments for eligibility, study treatment including evaluations, and follow-up visits.
Participants will undergo the study procedures in the normal course of their radioembolization procedure, with the addition of a second mapping procedure on the treatment day. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two mapping procedures: Sequence A or Sequence B.
It is expected that about 10-20 people in total will take part in this research study.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc., a biotechnology and medical device company, is supporting this research study by providing funding.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Small device used for mapping as part of radioembolization procedure
Pressure enabled small device used for mapping as part of radioembolization procedure
Other names: TriNav Infusion System catheter
Time frame: Up to 2 years
The primary endpoint of the study is radiotracer distribution, as measured by tumor to normal liver (T:N) ratio. Using SPECT/CT images collected subsequent to radiotracer delivery in mapping procedures, the volumetric tumor to normal liver (T:N) ratio of 99mTc-MAA distribution will be calculated using advanced imaging processing software, such as MIM SurePlan MRT. The T:N ratio of 99mTc-MAA delivered via the standard microcatheter will be compared to the PEDD device for each patient. The T:N ratio will be calculated for each tumor as well as in aggregate for the three largest tumors as described in Section 12.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Compare the mapping procedure radiotracer T:N ratio to therapeutic microsphere T:N ratio for both the standard microcatheter and the PEDD device when both the radiotracer and therapeutic microspheres were delivered by the same catheter
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Technical success of radiotracer delivery of each catheter, where success is defined as the satisfactory positioning and delivery of radiotracer.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Other
A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Examine The Effects of a Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery Device on Radiotracer Distribution Compared to a Standard Microcatheter in the Context of Radioembolization
Acronym: PEDIR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04926376
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Grafton, New Zealand
View Trial DetailsNCT01387555
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07386639
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
View Trial DetailsNCT00183885
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details