Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01387555

A Phase 2b Study of Modified Vaccinia Virus to Treat Patients Advanced Liver Cancer Who Failed Sorafenib

This study is to determine whether JX-594 (Pexa-Vec) plus best supportive care is more effective in improving survival than best supportive care in patients with advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) who have failed sorafenib.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This Phase 2b, open-label, randomized, multi-center study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JX-594 (Pexa-Vec) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have previously failed sorafenib treatment. Eligible patients are randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either the experimental therapy (JX-594 plus Best Supportive Care [BSC]) or the control therapy (BSC alone).

Patients assigned to the experimental arm receive an initial intravenous (IV) infusion of JX-594 on Day 1. This is followed by intratumoral (IT) injections of JX-594 directly into viable liver tumors under imaging guidance on Day 8, Day 22, and Weeks 6, 12, and 18. These patients will also receive BSC, but active anti-cancer treatments are strictly prohibited. In contrast, patients in the control arm receive only Best Supportive Care (e.g., hydration, nutrition, pain management) at the treating physician's discretion without any study drug injections. Experimental or active anti-cancer therapies are not permitted in the control arm.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the Overall Survival (OS) between the two treatment arms. Secondary objectives include evaluating Time-to-Tumor Progression (TTP) and objective response rate based on mRECIST criteria for HCC. The study also evaluates Time-to-Symptomatic Progression (TSP), which is defined by changes in the FACT Hepatobiliary Symptom Index (FHSI-8) questionnaire and ECOG performance status. Additionally, the study assesses changes in Quality of Life (QoL) measured by EORTC and FACT-Hep questionnaires. Finally, overall safety and tolerability are closely monitored through the incidence and severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.03, along with clinical laboratory evaluations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

KEY Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of primary HCC by tissue biopsy (histological/cytological diagnosis), or clinical diagnosis
  • Previously treated with sorafenib for ≥ 14 days and has discontinued sorafenib treatment at least 14 days prior to randomization due to either intolerance or radiographic progression NOTE: Sorafenib is NOT required to be the most recent treatment received for HCC
  • ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2
  • Child-Pugh Class A; or Child-Pugh Class B7 without clinically significant ascites
  • Hematocrit ≥30% or Hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL
  • Tumor status: Measurable viable tumor in the liver and injectable under imaging-guidance; At least one tumor in the liver that has not received prior local-regional treatment OR that has exhibited >25% growth in viable tumor size since prior local-regional treatment.

KEY Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received sorafenib within 14 days prior to randomization
  • Received systemic anti-cancer therapy other than sorafenib within 28 days of randomization
  • Prior treatment with JX-594
  • Platelet count < 50,000 PLT/ mm3
  • Total white blood cell count < 2,000 cells/mm3
  • Prior or planned organ transplant
  • Known significant immunodeficiency due to underlying illness (e.g. HIV/AIDS) and/or medication
  • Severe or unstable cardiac disease
  • Viable CNS malignancy associated with clinical symptoms
  • Pregnant or nursing an infant
  • History of inflammatory skin condition (e.g., eczema requiring previous treatment, atopic dermatitis)

Treatment and study plan

JX-594 recombinant vaccina GM-CSF

Biological

Patients will be randomised 2:1 to Arm A or Arm B and will receive 6 treatments on days 1, 8, 22, week 6, week 12, and week 18 plus best supportive care as needed.

Best supportive care

Other

Patients will be randomised 2:1 to Arm A or Arm B and will receive best supportive care as needed.

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival

    Time frame: From randomization until death from any cause, assessed up to 21 months.

    Determine overall survival for patients receiving JX-594 plus best supportive care (Arm A) compared with those patients receiving best supportive care (Arm B) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have failed sorafenib treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Tumor Progression

    Time frame: CT scan every six weeks until progression or death, assessed up to 21 months

    Determine time-to-tumor-progression (TTP) for JX-594 + BSC compared with BSC alone based on mRECIST for HCC. Progression is defined as 2 consecutive time points with increases in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of viable target tumors of at least 20% for each time point.

  2. Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (FACT-Hep Score)

    Time frame: Baseline to Visit 8 (Week 6 ) and Visit 11 (Week 12)

    Change in Quality of Life (QoL) over time based on the physical well-being and additional concerns domains of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire. The FACT-Hep measures health-related quality of life in patients with hepatobiliary cancer. The item scores from these specific subscales are summed to compute a combined score. The combined score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent a better quality of life and a better outcome.

  3. Overall Disease Control Rate (Tumor Response)

    Time frame: CT scan every 6 weeks until progression or death, assessed up to 21 months

    The overall disease control rate is defined as the percentage of patients achieving a Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Per mRECIST for HCC, CR is the disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions; PR is a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of viable target lesions; and SD is disease that does not qualify for either PR or progressive disease. Best response over all time points after Baseline was used.

  4. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug, assessed up to 14 months.

    Safety will be assessed by the number of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)

  5. Time-to-symptomatic-progression

    Time frame: From randomization until symptomatic progression or death, assessed up to 21 months

    Symptomatic progression is defined as a decrease of 4 points or more from Baseline in the FHSI-8 questionnaire (that was confirmed 3 weeks later), or a decrease in ECOG performance status to 4, or death.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jennerex Biotherapeutics

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2b Randomized Trial of JX-594 (Vaccinia GM-CSF / TK-deactivated Virus) Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Have Failed Sorafenib Treatment

Acronym: TRAVERSE

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Jul 4, 2011
Registry last updated
Jul 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.