Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06599281

The Importance of Physiotherapy After Separation Surgery in Pygopagus Conjoined Twins

Motor function delays are observed in pygopagus conjoined twins due to limited movement experience and deficits in proprioceptive sense. This study aimed to evaluate the neuromotor development of conjoined twins who acquired independent bodies, lives, and movements as a result of separation surgery, and to examine the effect of postoperative physiotherapy intervention on gross motor function.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

0 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

The study included two cases of pygopagus conjoined twins who applied for separation surgery at Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital between 2021 and 2022. The twins were 9 months and 21 days old (A1-A2) and 23 months and 11 days old (B1-B2). After separation surgery, a conventional physiotherapy program was administered regularly for 3 months, 6 days a week, with two sessions per day, each lasting 45 minutes. The Bayley-III Developmental Screening Test (DST) was used to evaluate neuromotor development, while the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) were used to assess gross motor development. Evaluations were performed preoperatively and at the 3rd postoperative month.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Having a diagnosis of pygopagus conjoined twins
  • Having normal vital signs after separation surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Having a diagnosis other than pygopagus conjoined twin
  • Abnormal vital signs after separation surgery

Treatment and study plan

Physiotherapy

Other

The physical therapy program was applied for 3 months, 6 days a week, 2 sessions per day, and an average session duration of 45 minutes. Each neurodevelopmental exercise and proprioceptive exercise was applied for 10 minutes, and stretching exercises were applied for 45 seconds and 3 repetitions. The exercises included functional rotation, sitting with or without arm support, crawling, kneeling, half kneeling, standing up by holding on, and sequencing exercises. Stretching exercises were mostly positional stretches aimed at lateral flexion of the spine.

Primary outcomes

  1. Bayley-III Screening Test

    Time frame: 3 months

    The Bayley-III is an individually administered scale that assesses the developmental functions of children aged 1-42 months. It evaluates five domains: cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional, and adaptive behavior. The cognitive (91 items), language (97 items), and motor (138 items) domains are assessed using tasks performed with the child, while the social-emotional and adaptive behavior domains are evaluated based on responses to a questionnaire completed by the caregiver.

    In the cognitive, language, and motor domains, scoring is done as "completed (1)" or "not completed (0)." The Bayley-III provides various scores for each domain, such as raw scores, scale scores, and composite scores. The scale score, derived from standardizing raw scores by age, is a quick and commonly used method in research.

  2. Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)

    Time frame: 3 months

    The GMFM-88 consists of 88 items and evaluates the child's performance in five different motor skill areas: A. Lying and Rolling (17 items), B. Sitting (20 items), C. Crawling and Kneeling (14 items), D. Standing (13 items) and E. Walking, Running, and Jumping (24 items). Each item in the GMFM-88 is administered by observing the child's natural movements or by giving instructions.

    The items measure the child's ability to perform specific movements. Each movement is scored based on the child's performance, with scores ranging from 0 to 3. 0: Cannot perform the movement, 1: Can partially perform the movement, 2: Can perform the movement independently, 3: Can perform the movement fully and correctly. The scores are summed for each area to obtain a total gross motor function score.

  3. Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS)

    Time frame: 3 months

    The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is an observational assessment used to identify children with delays in motor performance and to provide clinicians and families with information about the child's motor activities. The evaluation of the infant's independent walking and gross motor movements (weight shifting, posture, movements against gravity) takes approximately 20-30 minutes. Movements to be observed are assessed using age-appropriate toys for the infant. During the assessment, the infant continues with spontaneous movements, and postural control is observed while the infant engages in spontaneous motor behaviors.

    The AIMS assessment form contains illustrations of the postures and movements that need to be observed in the infant. It includes 58 items: 21 items in the prone position, 9 items in the supine position, 12 items in the sitting position, and 16 items in the standing position. Each item that the infant can perform is scored as "1," and items that cannot be performed

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Acıbadem Atunizade Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Registry last updated
Sep 19, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.