Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06606821

The Effects of Tirzepatide in People With Overweight/Obesity and Coronary Artery Disease

The objective of this study is to investigate, as a proof-of-principle, long-term (52 weeks) effects of tirzepatide once-weekly vs. placebo on changes in coronary plaque composition and progression (assessed by NIRS), plaque burden (assessed by IVUS) and microvascular function (assessed by invasively measured CFR) in overweight and obese individuals with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). In addition, the objective of a baseline cross-sectional sub-study is to explore potential metabolic and cardiovascular (CV) predictors for high arteriosclerotic plaque burden in overweight and obese individuals and to establish a cohort for future research projects.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

The anti-atherogenic effect of tirzepatide has been studied in preclinical studies and seems to involve mechanisms related to a reduction in vascular inflammation and lipid accumulation. Any direct anti-atherogenic effect of tirzepatide may potentially reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular endpoints in individuals with overweight or obesity. As a proof of principle, it would be of scientific and clinical interest to explore the anti-atherogenic effect of tirzepatide in humans. IVUS-NIRS imaging is uniquely suited for this purpose, as it makes it possible to detect changes in not only atheroma burden by IVUS but also to detect progression within the plaques in the lipidic/necrotic core component by NIRS. LCBItotal allows for consecutive detection of small changes in the same individual, which is pivotal to explore the supposed antiatherogenic mechanism of tirzepatide with enough statistical power.

The investigators hypothesize that once-weekly sc. tirzepatide can reduce coronary lipid accumulation in the arterial wall and the progression of atheromatosis in individuals with overweight or obesity and established high-risk atherosclerosis. The investigators aim to investigate this hypothesis in a proof-of-principle study by investigating the change in coronary plaque composition in individuals with overweight or obesity and coronary artery disease (CAD) with high-risk characteristics by NIRS imaging randomised to 52-week treatment with tirzepatide or placebo.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed written consent
  • BMI equal to or above 27 kg/m2
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Referred to coronary angiogram (CAG) due to stable angina
  • Coronary atheromatosis by angiography (obstructive or non-obstructive)
  • LCBI4mm >200 by NIRS in a vessel not subjected to coronary intervention

Exclusion criteria

  • History of diabetes or HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%) at baseline
  • Treatment with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RA)
  • History of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
  • Planned CV intervention (including percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiac surgery or transcatheter valve intervention) at time of randomisation
  • History of heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%
  • eGFR <30 ml/min/1.53 m2
  • History of pancreatitis or plasma amylase >2 times upper normal limit
  • Impaired hepatic function at baseline (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3 times the upper limit of normal)
  • Pregnancy, planned pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Family or history of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 2 or familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC)
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance (Tirzepatide) or to any of the excipients
  • Left main stenosis (≥50% diameter or haemodynamically significant)
  • Chronic total occlusion of any major coronary vessel
  • Multi-vessel disease or complex anatomy potentially requiring coronary bypass surgery
  • Coronary anatomy or pathology precluding the safe performance of intravascular imaging in all major coronary arteries not subjected to intervention

Treatment and study plan

Tirzepatide

Drug

Investigational drug will be administered as a sc. injection once-weekly.

Other names: LY3298176

Placebo

Drug

Placebo containing the same excipients and volume as the active treatment arm but without tirzepatide will be administered as a sc. injection once-weekly.

Other names: Saline

Primary outcomes

  1. Lipid core burden index

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Lipid core burden index of the three major coronary vessels (LCBItotal) measured by NIRS imaging.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent atheroma volume (PAV)

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Total coronary plaque burden measured by coronary IVUS imaging assessed by Percent atheroma volume (PAV)

  2. Number of high-risk coronary lesion

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Number of high-risk coronary lesions characterized by maximum lipid core burden index of a 4 mm examined vessel (maxLCBI4mm) ≥325 and plaque burden ≥70%

  3. Coronary flow reserve

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessed by invasive coronary thermodilution technique during coronary angiogram measures the blood flow in the epicardial arteries and the microvasculature.

Other outcomes

  1. Plasma lipid profile

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Total cholesterol (TC) Triglyceride (TG) High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) LDL-C

  2. Markers of inflammation

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    High-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

  3. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function assessed by echocardiography:

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured by speckle tracking E/e' measured by tissue-Doppler

  4. Body composition assessed by DXA scan:

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Regional visceral adipose tissue (VAT) Bone density

  5. Urine markers of oxidative stress

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    8-oxo-7,8-dihydro2´-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanosine (8-oxoGuo)

  6. Myocardial work

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Assessed by pressure-strain loop analysis derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography

  7. Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7) measures health status in patients with coronary artery disease. The SAQ-7 generates a summary score (scale 0-100, 100 = full health, 0 = worst health).

  8. Thromboelastography

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Thromboelastography is a viscoelastic hemostatic assay that measures the global viscoelastic properties of whole blood clot formation under low shear stress

    The following parameters will be measured:

    • R value = reaction time (min)
    • K = kinetics (min)
    • alpha = angle (degrees)
    • MA = maximum amplitude (mm) Represents the ultimate strength of the fibrin clot; i.e. overall stability of the clot
    • LY30 = amplitude at 30 minutes (%) Percentage decrease in amplitude at 30 minutes post-MA
  9. EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    The EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) is questionnaire of 5 health dimensions - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression - and includes 5 response categories of no problem, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The 5 responses give a health state or profile represented by a 5-digit number (for example, 12231) corresponding to response categories reported by patients for successive dimensions, beginning with mobility. Health states are scored to give the EQ-5D-5L index using a scoring algorithm from a value set derived from valuation tasks typically undertaken with general population samples. Index scores range from -0.59 to 1; 1 is the best possible health state.

  10. Liver stiffness measurement

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM): This measurement is performed using a technology called Fibroscan. It measures the stiffness or hardness of the liver, which correlates with the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring). The result is expressed in kilopascals (kPa). Normal liver stiffness values typically range from 2 to 7 kPa, with higher values indicating more severe fibrosis.

  11. Controlled Attenuation Parameter

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP): This measurement is performed using a technology called Fibroscan. This measures the amount of fat in the liver, known as steatosis. The CAP score is expressed in decibels per meter (dB/m) and ranges from 100 to 400 dB/m. Higher CAP scores indicate greater levels of liver fat.

  12. Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) evaluates systemic insulin resistance. HOMA-IR is calculated using fasting blood glucose and fasting insulin levels. The formula for HOMA-IR is: HOMA-IR = (Fasting Insulin uU/mL * Fasting Glucose mmol/L)/22.5

    HOMA-IR values between 0.5 and 1.4 are considered normal. ≥1.9 are indicative of early insulin resistance, and ≥2.9 indicate insulin resistance.

  13. Fibrosis-4 score

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score is a non-invasive scoring system used to estimate the amount of liver fibrosis in individuals. The score is calculated using the following formula:

    FIB-4 = (Age * aspartate aminotransferase level U/L )/(Platelet count 10^9/L * squareroot(alanine aminotransferase level U/L ))

    The resulting score helps to stratify patients into different risk categories for liver fibrosis Low risk: FIB-4 under 1.3 Intermediate risk: FIB-4 between 1.3 and 2.67 High risk: FIB-4 above 2.67

  14. Glycaemic profile

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Glycaemic variability measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) Glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

  15. Change in glycaemic variability

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Glycaemic variability measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) refers to the fluctuations in blood glucose levels over time.

    The following metrics are used to quantify glycaemic variability:

    Standard Deviation (SD): Measures the dispersion of glucose values around the mean.

    Coefficient of Variation (CV): The ratio of the standard deviation to the mean glucose level, expressed as a percentage.

    Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE): Captures the average of the absolute differences between consecutive peaks and nadirs in glucose levels.

    Continuous Overlapping Net Glycemic Action (CONGA): Measures the variability of glucose levels over a specified period.

  16. Change in fasting plasma glucose

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)

  17. Change in glycated haemoglobin A1c

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo:

    Glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

  18. Index of microcirculatory resistance

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo

    Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) assessed by coronary thermodilution technique during coronary angiogram

  19. Resistive Reserve Ratio

    Time frame: Between-group difference in change from baseline to week 52 in participants treated with tirzepatide vs placebo

    Resistive Reserve Ratio (RRR) assessed by coronary thermodilution technique during coronary angiogram is a measure used to evaluate the vasodilatory capacity of the coronary microvasculature.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Christine Rode Schwarz, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Daniel Raaschou-Oddershede, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4520157448

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tina Vilsbøll

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effects of Tirzepatide on Coronary Plaque Lipid Content and Myocardial Microvascular Function in Overweight and Obese People With Coronary Disease - The IDEAL-COR Study

Acronym: IDEAL-COR

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Sep 23, 2024
Registry last updated
May 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.