Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07414862

The Effects of Finger Extensor Training on Climbing Performance Compared With Traditional Flexor Training

The purpose of this study, is to assess climbing performance metrics that include max strength testing on a rock climbing hangboard, maximum grip strength, assessment of pain and function using the DASH (disability of the arm, shoulder and hand), and maximum flexor strength and maximum extensor strength in climbers who perform a traditional finger training protocol compared to climbers who train both traditional flexor training protocol and extensor tendons.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mazamas

Portland, Oregon, 97215, United States

About this study

Hand, forearm strength, and endurance are highly important elements in elite climbers. Constant training is essential, e.g. eccentric-concentric training of finger flexors. Climbers have traditionally trained finger flexor strength for climbing performance, however to our knowledge, no formal protocol exists for training extensor tendons. In a study performed by Devise, finger flexor to extensor strength ratios were found to be 3:1 in non-climbers. In experienced or elite climbers however, the average ratio was 6:1 and as high as 9:1. Upper extremity injuries are most common in rock climbers, with finger injuries being most prevalent. Pulley injuries, consisting of rupture of the A2 or A4 annular pulleys are the most common type of injury. Other finger injuries include tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons, as well as lumbrical muscle tears. The coordinated action of flexor and extensor tendons allows for a wide range of hand movements, including grasping, gripping, and releasing objects, as well as intricate finger movements. The pulleys along the tendons (annular and cruciate) act as fulcrums, increasing the mechanical advantage of the tendons and allowing for efficient flexion. Damage to either flexor or extensor tendons can lead to significant loss of hand function. The purpose of our study, is to assess climbing performance metrics that include max strength testing on a rock climbing hangboard, maximum grip strength, assessment of pain and function using the DASH (disability of the arm, shoulder and hand), and maximum flexor strength and maximum extensor strength in climbers who perform a traditional finger training protocol compared to climbers who train both traditional flexor training protocol and extensor tendons.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Recreational to advanced rock climbers as defined by the International Rock Climbing Research Association (IRCRA) scale
  • Climbing experience of at least 1-2 sessions per week for the past 6 months OR a minimum of 2 years of climbing experience
  • Ability to commit to two 45-minute training sessions per week for 6 weeks
  • Access to a hangboard or fingerboard and appropriate loading equipment
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Willingness to refrain from climbing the day prior to testing sessions

Exclusion criteria

  • Upper extremity injury (hand, wrist, elbow, or shoulder) within the past 6 months
  • Participation in a structured or organized hangboard training protocol within the past 4 months
  • Climbing less than 1-2 times per week during the past 6 months and less than 2 total years of climbing experience
  • Age under 18 years
  • Inability to safely perform maximal isometric finger flexion or extension testing
  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with the study protocol

Treatment and study plan

Traditional Hangboard Protocol

Other

A structured finger flexor strength training protocol performed on a climbing hangboard at 70% of maximal finger flexion strength. Training consists of 5 seconds of isometric loading followed by 5 seconds of rest for 6 repetitions per set, across 6 sets with 3 minutes rest between sets. Training is performed twice weekly for six weeks following a standardized upper extremity warm-up.

Extensor Tendon Isometric Training

Other

A structured finger extensor tendon training protocol performed at 70% of maximal finger extension strength using isometric loading. This intervention will be in addition to performing the Finger Flexor Protocol. Training consists of 30-second isometric contractions with 3 minutes of rest between sets for a total of 6 sets per hand. Training is performed twice weekly for six weeks and is completed during rest periods of the finger flexor training protocol

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal Finger Extension Strength (MES)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-training), 3 weeks, and 7 weeks (post-training)

    Maximum isometric finger extension force for digits 2-5 measured using a VALD strain gauge system with finger loops positioned over the middle phalanx. Three 5-second trials per hand with 20 seconds rest; best of three recorded for each hand.

  2. Maximal Finger Flexion Strength (MFS) on Hangboard

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-training), 3 weeks, and 7 weeks (post-training)

    Maximal added load (or total load) for a 7-second hang on a 30 mm hangboard edge using a standardized half/open crimp position. Load increased until participant cannot maintain the full 7 seconds; maximal successful load recorded.

  3. Finger Stamina and Endurance /Time Under Tension (TUT) at 80% of MFS

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, and 7 weeks

    Stamina assessed as total time under tension while maintaining 80% of calculated maximal finger flexion strength using a Tindeq device and a 20 mm fingerblock. Endurance will be measured by calculating critical force at the completion of the test. Participants alternate 7-second work and 3-second rest cycles while attempting to maintain 80% target force for as many repetitions as possible to calculate stamina (up to 24 cycles). Critical Force will be calculated for each hand at completion of 24 cycles to measure endurance.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, and 7 weeks

    Self-reported upper extremity disability and symptoms using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, a 30-item validated instrument. Each item is scored from 1 (no difficulty/no symptoms) to 5 (unable to perform activity/severe symptoms). The final score is calculated using the standardized formula and converted to a scale ranging from 0 to 100, where:

    0 = no disability

    100 = most severe disability

    Higher scores indicate worse upper extremity function.

  2. Finger Flexion-to-Extension Strength Ratio

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, and 7 weeks

    Ratio calculated from maximal finger flexion strength (hangboard test) divided by maximal finger extension strength (VALD test), calculated for each hand.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Maximal Finger Flexion and Extension Strength

    Time frame: Baseline to 7 weeks

    Change from baseline to 7 weeks in maximal finger flexion strength (hangboard) and maximal finger extension strength (VALD).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

April Henderson

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effects of Finger Extensor Training on Climbing Performance Compared With Traditional Flexor Training: A Randomized Control Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.