Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00564122

The Accuracy of an Artificially-intelligent Stethoscope

This study will characterize the accuracy of a commercially available artificially-intelligent stethoscope in determining which childhood murmurs suggest underlying congenital structural heart disease and therefore warrant diagnostic echocardiograms.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Akron Children's Hospital's Heart Center, Akron, Ohio, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Heart murmurs can be ausculted in most pediatric patients, but underlying Congenital Structural Heart (CSH) Disease is rare. Nevertheless, CSH Disease is often first suggested by the presence of a murmur. Primary care providers refer pediatric patients to Cardiologists for murmur evaluations with low accuracy, and this pattern results in:

  • needless emotional strain on many patients with functionally normal hearts and their families,
  • increased morbidity and mortality rates for rare patients with delayed cardiac diagnoses, and
  • exorbitant costs to society.

Referral accuracy for murmur evaluations probably is low because the differences between innocent and pathological murmurs can be subtle. Computer-assisted analysis of heart sounds may increase the accuracy of primary care referrals to pediatric cardiologists, but the accuracy of the only FDA-approved artificially-intelligent cardiac auscultation system, Zargis Medical Corporation's Cardioscan®, has never been determined prospectively in an unselected population of live pediatric patients. As a primary endpoint, the study herein proposed would prospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Cardioscan® with that of CHMCA's Pediatric Cardiologists in the identification of cardiac pathology among 300 new and unselected pediatric patients referred to CHMCA's cardiologists for murmur evaluations, using two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography as the common gold-standard. Double-blinding will be in place. The study also will attempt secondarily to gauge the clinical significance of pathology missed by the Cardioscan®, to define sub-populations of patients among which the Cardioscan's® judgment should be considered less accurate, and to gather data concerning the value and acceptability to families of the Cardioscan®. If (as expected) the Cardioscan's® accuracy merely approaches that of Pediatric Cardiologists, then the study herein proposed would still establish the Cardioscan® as a formidable tool for primary care providers-a helpful, billable, and potentially cost-saving alternative to consulting Cardiology on patients with probably- or possibly-innocent murmurs. Data collection for this project will occur predominantly within CHMCA's Heart Center in Akron, although some data collection may occur within CHMCA and/or at CHMCA's Heart Centers in Beachwood and/or Boardman. Minimal disruption to existing clinical patient flow through those settings would be expected and the entire protocol is expected to be completely painless and noninvasive, with no foreseeable health risks.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient must present to a consulted cardiologist for a 1st non-primary care murmur evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Non English-speakers
  • At least moderately agitated or disruptive patients
  • An echocardiogram or a Cardiology evaluation was done previously
  • The patient no longer has an ausculable murmur at presentation.
  • The patient didn't have a transthoracic echocardiogram with Color Doppler done.
  • Patients admitted to the NICU before protocol completes.
  • Protocol can't be completed on the day of presentation.

Treatment and study plan

Artificially-Intelligent Stethoscope

Device

After subjects' medical visits are complete, the heart sounds of all subjects will be recorded and assessed by an artificially-intelligent stethoscope. Attempts will be made to make satisfactory 20-second recordings from a total of eight positions on the chest with the patient in supine and upright positions.

Other names: Cardioscan, Zargis Medical Corporation, Serial Number 000127

physical examination

Other

A Pediatric Cardiologist will examine each subject to the extent needed to make clinical assessments. This represents the ordinary standard-of-care.

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of the Artificially-Intelligent Stethoscope as compared with that of Pediatric Cardiologists in determining which patients needed echocardiograms because they have congenital structural heart disease

    Time frame: Not applicable; all data collection for any given patient will be completed within less than 12 hours--usually MUCH less than 12 hours.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Specificity of the Artificially-Intelligent Stethoscope as compared with that of Pediatric Cardiologists in determining which patients needed echocardiograms because they have congenital structural heart disease.

    Time frame: Not applicable; all data collection for any given patient will be completed within less than 12 hours--usually MUCH less than 12 hours.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Akron Children's Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • John R. Bockoven, M.D. M.B.A.
  • Thomas C. Dispenza, M.D.

Registry information

Official study title

A Comparison of the Accuracy of an Artificially-Intelligent Stethoscope Versus Pediatric Cardiologists in the Assessment of Pediatric Patients Referred to a Cardiologist for the Assessment of a Heart Murmur

Important dates

Study start
2007
Study completion
2008
First posted
Nov 27, 2007
Registry last updated
Nov 1, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.