Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT05364567
This prospective, randomized, controlled study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (IRB no. 2018-04-017). All study participants consented the study and agreed the written informed consent. All participants who are applicable to the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group and the study group. Both groups were treated with phototherapy including 308-nm excimer laser or narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB). Study group had vitamin D supplementation through the injection additionally.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seoul, South Korea
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The study group with vitamin D deficiency was treated with intramuscular injection of 200,000 IU cholecalciferol (Kwangdong Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, Korea) once at baseline.
The phototherapy for treating depigmented areas was by using 308-nm xenon chloride excimer laser (E1, Jetema, Seoul, Korea) or NB-UVB (N-UVB 6000C, Choyang medical, Seongnam, Korea). The initial dose for excimer laser was decided based on the location of depigmented lesion with consideration of the previous results of the phototherapy;40-42 eye = 100mJ/cm2; head, face, ear, neck, axilla = 150mJ/cm2; arm, leg, trunk = 200mJ/cm2; wrist = 250mJ/cm2; elbow, knee = 300mJ/cm2; hand, foot = 400mJ/cm2; finger, toe = 600mJ/cm2; Meanwhile, initial dose for NB-UVB was 400mJ/cm2. If the erythema after laser disappears within 24 hours, the energy dose was increased by 50 mJ/cm2 for each treatment. But if the erythema sustained for 24-48 hours, the energy dose was maintained. If the erythema last longer than 48 hours, the energy dose was decreased by 50-100 mJ/cm2 at each session. If blistering or pain occured, the treatment was omitted until resolution of symptoms.
Time frame: baseline
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
Time frame: 1 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
Time frame: 2 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
Time frame: 3 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
Time frame: 4 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
Time frame: 5 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
Time frame: 6 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
Time frame: baseline
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
Time frame: 1 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
Time frame: 2 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
Time frame: 3 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
Time frame: 4 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
Time frame: 5 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
Time frame: 6 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Other
Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients With Vitiligo Induced Additive Effects With Phototherapy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07631312
Anemia, Anemia, Hypochromic
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06700122
Avitaminosis, Deficiency Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06654063
Avitaminosis, Deficiency Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07481240
Avitaminosis, Deficiency Diseases
Cork, Co. Cork, Ireland
View Trial Details