Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00607880

Study Comparing Two Types of Ports in Patients With Cancer Receiving Intravenous Chemotherapy

RATIONALE: Giving chemotherapy drugs through an implanted port reduces the need for multiple needle sticks. It is not yet known whether one type of port is more effective than another in reducing infections and other side effects associated with long-term port use.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is comparing two types of ports in patients with cancer receiving intravenous chemotherapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States

About this study

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To compare the rate of port failure, defined as the occurrence of port malfunction or port infection within 12 months after port insertion, in patients with cancer requiring long-term adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy undergoing insertion of a newly designed, FDA-approved Vortex® implantable vascular access port vs a conventional vascular access port.

Secondary

  • To compare the rate of port malfunction or port infection at 6 and 12 months after port insertion.
  • To compare the rate of central vein thrombosis at 6 and 12 months after port insertion.
  • To compare the rate of port removal for any reason other than infection or occlusion at 6 and 12 months after port insertion.
  • To compare the rate of termination of use of the indwelling port at 6 and 12 months after port insertion.
  • To compare the death from all causes.
  • To compare the incidence of port-related interventions at 6 and 12 months after port insertion.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 intervention arms.

  • Arm I: Patients undergo insertion of a conventional vascular access port. Patients then receive standard chemotherapy.
  • Arm II : Patients undergo insertion of the Vortex® implantable vascular access port. Patients then receive standard chemotherapy.

All episodes of access to the port are documented for 12 months after port insertion. Information including the reason for port access and difficulty in access is collected. Complications, such as occlusion and infection, implant duration, and incidence of port-related interventions are assessed at 6 and 12 months after port insertion.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of malignancy requiring intravenous chemotherapy for ≥ 6 months
  • Must undergo entire course of chemotherapy at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, unless the outside treating institution agrees to submit the research data sheet to Mayo Clinic
  • Scheduled time frame for regular use of the vascular access port ≥ 3 months after port insertion

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
  • No active skin condition implicating an elevated risk of local or systemic infectious or non-infectious complications, including any of the following:
  • Current skin infection
  • Cutaneous lymphoma
  • Auto-immune disorders
  • Active vasculitis
  • Connective tissue diseases
  • No known active infection requiring antibiotic therapy at the time of port implantation
  • Patients without an active infection who are on chronic antibiotic suppressive therapy are eligible
  • No concurrent illness requiring chronic anticoagulation
  • Patients who develop other comorbidities requiring chronic anticoagulation during the study period are eligible

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Treatment and study plan

vascular access device placement

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Port Failure Within 12 Months of Port Insertion

    Time frame: Up to 12 months from port insertion

    We report the proportion of patients in each treatment group who have some degree of port failure. Port failure is defined as the composite outcome of port malfunction due to partial or total occlusion and any infection related to the port, within 12 months of port insertion. The percentages reported here are the number of patients that had reported a port failure within 12 months out of the number of patients with port failure within 12 months plus the number of patients that were followed 12 months without port failure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Death From All Causes

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after port insertion

    Number of patients that died during treatment due to any cause.

  2. Port Removal for Any Reason Other Than Infection or Occlusion Within 12 Months After Port Insertion

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after port insertion

    We report the number of patients that terminated use of port due to any reason other than infection or occlusion within 12 months.

  3. Termination of Use of the Indwelling Port at 12 Months After Port Insertion

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after port insertion

    The number of patients that discontinued use of inserted port for any reason at the 12 month timepoint.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Randomized Study of the Vortex® Implantable Access Port Versus the BardPort™ Implantable Port in Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Intravenous Chemotherapy

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Feb 6, 2008
Registry last updated
May 9, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.