Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111, United States
NCT Number: NCT02088775
This clinical trial studies positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) in determining the radiation dose delivered with radioactive spheres to patients with liver metastasis or primary liver or biliary cancer. Comparing results of diagnostic procedures dose before and after delivery of radioactive spheres to the liver may help determine radioembolization dose and plan the best treatment for liver metastasis or primary liver or biliary cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the relationship between radiation dose to 70% of the tumor volume as determined by post-treatment positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) and local control at 6 months.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the ability of PET-CT to reproducibly determine dose to tumor, normal liver, and other surrounding organs.
II. To determine the stability of microsphere location by examining the changes in dose in a subset of patients with PET-CT scans performed on day 0 and day 1.
III. To determine the relationship of dose predicted by technetium-99m (Tc-99m) labeled Macro-aggregated albumin (MAA) imaged using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) versus post-treatment dosimetry.
IV. To determine the effect of dose delivered on local control and normal tissue complications.
V. To measure the perfusion of the tumor for correlation with dose deposition, based on arterial phase CT measurements.
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo PET-CT scan before and after standard radioembolization on day 0. A subset of patients undergo PET-CT scan on day 1, 24 hours after the day 0 post-treatment PET-CT.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 week, 1 and 3 months, every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 1 year and then annually for 3 years.
Although the study uses radiation-emitting imaging devices (PET/CT and SPECT) and standard-of-care Y-90 radioembolization, the clinical investigation does not study the performance, effect, safety, effectiveness, design, or intended use of an FDA-regulated device product. The research objectives are limited to characterization of radiation dose distribution and correlation of dosimetry with clinical outcomes; therefore, the study does not "Study a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product" within the meaning of 42 CFR Part 11
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo PET-CT scan
Other names: FDG-PET, positron emission tomography, emission computed
Undergo PET-CT scan
Other names: computed tomography, computed
Undergo standard radioembolization
Time frame: Up to day 1
Standard summary measures such as means, medians, ranges, and standard deviations will be used to characterize the dosages received by tumor and other tissue. The relationship between radiation dose and local control will be determined using regression models with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to account for within-patient correlation. Logistic regression will be used to adjust for potentially confounding factors such as tumor volume, primary histology, and SIR-Spheres versus Therasphere intervention.
Time frame: At 6 months
The relationship between radiation dose and local control will be determined using regression models with GEE to account for within-patient correlation.
Time frame: Up to day 1
Standard summary measures such as means, medians, ranges, and standard deviations will be used to characterize the dosages received by tumor and other tissue.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Each side effect will be characterized as present or absent. The relationship between radiation dose to the relevant type of healthy tissue and each side effect will be tested.
Time frame: Up to day 1
Differences between PET-CT and MAA doses, and present the data graphically will be calculated and presented graphically. The method proposed by Bland & Altman (2007) will be used to assess the agreement between the two methods.
Time frame: Baseline
Differences between PET-CT and MAA doses, and present the data graphically will be calculated and presented graphically. The method proposed by Bland & Altman (2007) will be used to assess the agreement between the two methods.
Time frame: Day 0 to day 1
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Other
Intrinsic Dosimetry for Radioembolization Utilizing PET-CT Imaging Data: A Prospective Registry Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00101036
Adenocarcinoma, Adult Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00107536
Adenocarcinoma, Adult Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00033462
Adenocarcinoma, Adult Primary Cholangiocellular Carcinoma
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00030498
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoma
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details