Institute Bergonié
Bordeaux, 33076, France
NCT Number: NCT00712712
RATIONALE: Morphine may reduce pain in patients who have undergone radiofrequency ablation to remove bone metastases.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well morphine works after radiofrequency ablation of painful bone metastases in patients with cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Bordeaux, 33076, France
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
Patients complete a pain questionnaire over 1 week before undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Patients also complete questionnaires about pain, physical performance, quality of life (QOL), and anxiety at baseline.
Bone metastases are removed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). After surgery, patients receive acetaminophen and patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) morphine sulfate. PCA morphine sulfate continues with a dose increase of 50% bolus every 24 hours. Patients with maximum pain less than or equal to that at inclusion receive standard morphine sulfate therapy instead.
Data concerning the total dose of PCA morphine sulfate; minimum, average, and maximum pain intensity; side effects and complications of RFA; and total dose of morphine sulfate (or equivalent) is collected daily.
Pain is assessed at 4 and 8 weeks after RFA. Patients complete follow-up questionnaires about physical performance, QOL, and anxiety at 12 weeks. Patients also undergo a CT scan at 12 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Intravenous administration of paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
Other names: Paracetamol
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), allowing morphine consumption to be titrated to the patient's needs and thus allowing morphine doses to be adapted to an increase in pain in the patient's post-operative period or a rapid analgesic effect of radiofrequency.
Other names: Oral morphine equivalent
Pain notebook will allow the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned, containing information on :
Patients' quality of life will be assessed using the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 at inclusion in the study and at 8 weeks after radiofrequency. ablation.
Recent technique of thermal destruction of tumors.
This technique consists of inserting an electrode needle into the tumour under X-ray or ultrasound guidance or intraoperatively under laparoscopy for example. This needle carries a current or a light wave depending on the characteristics of the generator to which it is connected (radiofrequency, laser).
Radio frequencies are radiation non-ionising electromagnets. In this context of tissue ablathermia wavelengths ranging from 400kHz to 500kHz.
Time frame: 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to an 11-point numerical scale
Rate of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their most intense pain, 2 months after the radiofrequency ablation.
This rate is calculated for the evaluable population for the principal outcome measure.
This rate is equal to the ratio of the number of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their maximum pain divided by the size of the evaluable population.
The response rate considered acceptable is 50%, above this threshold the treatment will be considered potentially effective and may be proposed in phase III.
Time frame: Inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to a discrete 11-points numerical scale.
Increased/decreased pain is considered as a variation of at least one point on the numerical scale.
If 25 patients or more are observed with pain reduction of 2 or more points, then the treatment will be considered potentially effective.
Time frame: First algology assessment at pre-selection visit
According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Here, are presented only data collected at the pre-selection visit.
Time frame: Second algology assessment at inclusion visit
According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Here, are presented only data collected at the inclusion visit.
Time frame: Algology assessment one day before radiofrequency (J-1)
According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Here, are presented only data collected one day before radiofrequency (J-1).
Time frame: Algology assessment one day after radiofrequency: J+1
According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Here, are presented only data collected one day after radiofrequency (J+1).
Time frame: Algology assessment at the discharge from hospital visit
According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Here, are presented only data collected at the discharge from hospital visit.
Time frame: Algology assessment 7 days after discharge from hospital
According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Here, are presented only data collected 7 days after discharge from hospital.
Time frame: Algology assessment 1 month after radiofrequency
According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Here, are presented only data collected 1 month after radiofrequency.
Time frame: Algology assessment 2 months after radiofrequency
According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Here, are presented only data collected 2 months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: Algology assessment 3 months after radiofrequency
According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Here, are presented only data collected 3 months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: Preselection: First algology visit (within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation)
Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: Inclusion: Second algology visit (One week after the first algology visit)
Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: J-1 (One day before radiofrequency)
Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: Discharge from hospital
Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: 7 days after discharge
Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: 1 month after radiofrequency
Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: 2 months after radiofrequency
Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: 3 months after radiofrequency
Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Time frame: 24 hours after radiofrequency
Total intravenous dose of morphine 24 hours after the radiofrequency was assessed during the patient's hospital stay.
As a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
Time frame: 24 hours after radiofrequency
As a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
Time frame: Inclusion
Quality of life Questionnaire -Core 30 (QLQ-C30) developed in 1986 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assesses quality of life across 15 dimensions :
5 functional dimensions : Physical functioning, Role functioning, Emotional, Cognitive functioning, Social functioning; 9 symptomatic dimensions: Fatigue, Nausea and vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Diarrhoea, Financial difficulties;
1 global health dimension: Global health status/QoL
Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.
Time frame: 2 months after radiofrequency
Quality of life Questionnaire -Core 30 (QLQ-C30) developed in 1986 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assesses quality of life across 15 dimensions :
5 functional dimensions : Physical functioning, Role functioning, Emotional, Cognitive functioning, Social functioning; 9 symptomatic dimensions: Fatigue, Nausea and vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Diarrhoea, Financial difficulties;
1 global health dimension: Global health status/QoL
Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.
Institut Bergonié
Other
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Radiofrequency Ablation for Reducing Refractory Pain From Bone Metastases
Acronym: MEDOR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00855803
Metastatic Cancer, Neoplasm Metastasis
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00026247
Metastatic Cancer, Neoplasm Metastasis
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00608855
Metastatic Cancer, Neoplasm Metastasis
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00003884
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details