Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07752043

Standard of Care Comparative Arm of Phase 1/2 Gene Therapy Trial DREPAMIR" in Severe Sickle Cell Disease Patients

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of transplantation of gene modified autologous CD34+ cells in SCD patients within a therapeutic strategy that may include anti-inflammatory treatment as a pre-transplant treatment in case of severe inflammation detected at the inclusion analysis; the autologous CD34+ cell will be transduced by the bifunctional βAS3m/miR7m lentiviral vector expressing the therapeutical beta-globin, βAS3m, and the miRNA anti-HbS vs Standard Of Care (SOC).

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

12 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Apheresis Unit

Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75015, France

Location contact

Joseph LAURE, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

01 44 49 55 91 ext. +33

About this study

Sickle cell disease is a severe hemoglobinopathy characterized by anemia, chronic hemolysis, and vaso-occlusive crises, leading to high morbidity and mortality.

Medical management options or Standard Of Care (SOC) currently available for SCD include supportive management of VOC, long-term RBC transfusions, and foetal haemoglobin (HbF) induction with hydroxyurea (HU).

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is curative but available only for a minority of patients. Gene therapy approaches (gene addition or gene editing) have shown significant reductions in vaso-occlusive events, but residual hemolysis persists and their truly curative potential remains uncertain.

In France, the absence of a control arm in clinical trials has limited regulatory approval, supporting the development of the DREPAMIR protocol, which incorporates a Standard Of Care control group to better assess the efficacy clinical value and cost effectiveness of gene therapy in severe sickle cell disease.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of transplantation of gene modified autologous CD34+ cells in SCD patients within a therapeutic strategy that may include anti-inflammatory treatment as a pre-transplant treatment in case of severe inflammation detected at the inclusion analysis; the autologous CD34+ cell will be transduced by the bifunctional βAS3m/miR7m lentiviral vector expressing the therapeutical beta-globin, βAS3m, and the miRNA anti-HbS vs Standard Of Care (SOC).

Drepamir-SOC is the control arm of the main study DREPAMIR (NCT07432867)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 12 - 35 years
  • Diagnosis of HbSS by Hb electrophoresis and genetic analysis to analyse the alpha locus
  • Clinical history or ongoing evidence of severe sickle cell anemia with one OR more of the following clinical complications demonstrating disease severity:

At least 3 vaso-occlusive crises requiring hospitalization, under hydroxyurea or transfusion, within 2 years prior to enrollment One severe acute chest syndrome (ACS) hospitalized in the intensive care unit At least 2 episodes of ACS, including one under HU. Acute priapism (at least 2 episodes >3h in the preceding year or in the year prior to the start of a regular transfusion program), OR stuttering priapism ≥ 1 by week under sickle cell treatment (HU, transfusion or phlebotomy).

Tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8m/s on cardiac echocardiograph without pulmonary hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization (mPAP><25mmHg)

  • Failed hydroxyurea (HU) therapy, were unable to tolerate HU therapy, OR inadequate clinical response to HU, defined as any one of the following outcomes, while on HU for at least 3 months: 2 or more acute sickle pain crisis requiring hospitalization, requirement of transfusion to maintain Hb >6.0g/dL, an episode of ACS despite adequate supportive care measures
  • Karnovsky/Lansky performance score ≥ 60%
  • Sexually active patients must be willing to use an acceptable method of double-barrier contraception for at least 12 months post-infusion (beyond 12 months at the discretion of the investigator)
  • Procedure for obtaining consent (adults, dependent minors, to give their consent)
  • Affiliation to social security

Exclusion criteria

  • Existence of a matched sibling donor
  • Based on myelogram, the presence of chromosomal (detected by karyotyping) or molecular abnormalities (detected by NGS) and retained dangerous by the Hemato-Oncology referent and validated during a specific multidisciplinary concerted meeting
  • Patients who have already been treated with gene therapy or BMT
  • Hematologic evaluation: Leukopenia (WBC <3,000/µL) or neutropenia (ANC <1,000/µL) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/µL) within 90 days prior to mobilization or harvest (not due to an erytrapheresis procedure or possible acute viral infection)
  • PT/INR or PTT >1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or clinically significant bleeding disorder
  • Two alpha deletions (risk of alpha-thalassemia after gene therapy)

Evaluations within 6 months prior to screening visit:

  • ALT or AST >3 times ULN
  • Severe liver iron overload evaluated by MRI (>15mg Fe/g dry weight or >270umol Fe/g dry weight) or liver cirrhosis suspicion on echography or elastometry or CT scan or MRI AND confirmed by histology
  • Measured GFR <60ml/min/1.73 m²
  • Cardiac evaluation: LVEF <40% by cardiac echocardiogram or by MUGA scan or clinically significant ECG abnormalities
  • Stroke with significant CNS sequelae i.e., Rankin >2
  • Specific sickle cell disease cerebral vasculopathy confirmed by MRA (magnetic resonance angiography) OR transcranial doppler ultrasound with or without Moya-moya WITH an indication of chronic transfusion program (target HbS<30%)
  • Lung interstitial infiltrate AND Forced Vital Capacity less than 70% AND DLCO less than 60% at steady state
  • Confirmed pulmonary hypertension defined by a right heart catheterization (PAPm >25 mmHg). Right heart catheterization is required if tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8m/s on cardiac echocardiograph OR >2.5m/s with an abnormal Brain Natriuretic Peptide dosage or an important decrease in transcutaneous Hb O2 saturation during the 6 minutes' walk test.
  • Seropositivity for HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HCV (Hepatitis C Virus), HTLV-1 (Human T-Lymphotropic Virus), or active Hepatitis B Virus, or active infection by CMV or parvovirus B19, based on positive blood PCR.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding in a postpartum female
  • Any current cancer or prior history of a malignant disease, with the exception of curatively treated non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Immediate family member with an established or suspected Familial Cancer Syndrome
  • Diagnosis of significant psychiatric disorder of the subject that could seriously impede the ability to participate in the study
  • Patients who failed previous HSCT
  • Any clinically significant active infection
  • Participation in another clinical study with an investigational drug within 30 days of screening
  • Any condition, based on perspective of the medical monitor and treating investigator, which may lead to increased safety risk or inability to comply with the protocol.

Treatment and study plan

Standard of care

Drug

Supportive management of VOC, long-term RBC transfusions, and foetal haemoglobin (HbF) induction with hydroxyurea (HU) Myocardic MRI (evaluation of function and fibrosis) + hematocrit measurement QoL questionnaires Imaging (brain MRI, transcranial and cervical ultrasound) Cardiac US, ECG Cardiac and Liver MRI (Fe assessment) Physical ability assessments Neuropsychological assessments Fertility

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease-related mortality

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  2. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  3. Occurrence of vaso-occlusive events

    Time frame: between 3 and 15 months following IV infusion of DREAM01 of the corresponding matched DREPAMIR patient

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of HbS

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Measure of HbS

  2. Percentage of HbF

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Measure of HbF

  3. Rate of Hemolysis

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Biological parameters that reflect hemolysis : Total hemoglobin, Reticulocytes, lactate dehydrogenase LDH, circulating erythroblasts, haptoglobin, free plasmatic heme, no conjugated bilirubin, erythropoietin EPO

  4. Rate of Anemia

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Biological parameters that reflect anemia : Total hemoglobin, Reticulocytes, lactate dehydrogenase LDH, circulating erythroblasts, haptoglobin, free plasmatic heme, no conjugated bilirubin, erythropoietin EPO

  5. Transfusion requirement

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    absence of vaso-occlusive events (VOE) in patients who have discontinued the transfusion program or/and hydroxyurea

  6. Change in number of units of RBCs transfused

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  7. Changes in brain function

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Occurrence of ischemic lesions, vascular stenosis, aneurysm assessed using cervical doppler ultrasound and cerebral MRI

  8. Changes in brain function

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Occurrence of pathological flow acceleration or vascular stenosis using carotid and transcranial Doppler ultrasound

  9. Changes in ocular function

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Assessed Using Fundus examination

  10. Changes in ocular function

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Assessed Using angiography

  11. Changes in cardiac function

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Evaluated through electrocardiographic (ECG) assessment : overall interpretation with 3 categories such as Normal/ Abnormal, not clinically significant/ Abnormal, clinically significant

  12. Changes in the occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] right and left atrial

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], right and left atrial, left assessed using cardiac ultrasound.

  13. Changes in the occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] right and left atrial

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], right and left atrial, left assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)

  14. Changes in the occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] right and left atrial

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], right and left atrial, left assessed using Doppler echocardiography.

  15. Changes in the occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] right and left atrial

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], right and left atrial, left assessed using transthoracic echocardiography

  16. Changes in left ventricular size

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in left ventricular size assessed using cardiac ultrasound.

  17. Changes in left ventricular size

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in left ventricular size assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)

  18. Changes in left ventricular size

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in left ventricular size assessed using Doppler echocardiography

  19. Changes in left ventricular size

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in left ventricular size assessed using transthoracic echocardiography

  20. Changes in left ventricular wall thickness

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in the left ventricular wall thickness assessed using cardiac ultrasound.

  21. Changes in left ventricular wall thickness

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in the left ventricular wall thickness assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)

  22. Changes in left ventricular wall thickness

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in the left ventricular wall thickness assessed using Doppler echocardiography

  23. Changes in left ventricular wall thickness

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in the left ventricular wall thickness assessed using transthoracic echocardiography

  24. Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP ]

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP], assessed using cardiac ultrasound.

  25. Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP ]

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP], assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)

  26. Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP ]

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP], assessed using Doppler echocardiography

  27. Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP ]

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP], assessed using transthoracic echocardiography

  28. Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV ]

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV] assessed using cardiac ultrasound

  29. Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV ]

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV] assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)

  30. Title : Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV]

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV] assessed using Doppler echocardiography

  31. Title : Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV]

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV] assessed using transthoracic echocardiography

  32. Changes in E/A ratio

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Changes in of E/A ratio assessed using cardiac ultrasound, cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging), Doppler echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography

  33. Change in serum electrolyte panel

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  34. Change in serum creatinine

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  35. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR )

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Renal function assessed through estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using CKD-EPI equation

  36. Change in urinary microalbumin

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  37. Change in protein excretion

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  38. Change in urinary creatinine

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  39. Changes in creatinine clearence

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  40. Change in liver enzyme AST

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  41. Change in liver enzyme ALT

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  42. Change in liver enzyme GGT

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  43. Changes in in liver enzyme ALP

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  44. Change in total bilirubin

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  45. Change in unconjugated (free) bilirubin

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  46. Changes in hepatic function

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    overall interpretation with 3 categories such as Normal/ Abnormal, not clinically significant/ Abnormal, clinically significant

  47. Change in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO )

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  48. Change in vital capacity (VC )

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  49. Change in residual volume (RV )

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  50. Change in FEV1/FVC ratio (Tiffeneau index )

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  51. Changes in bone metabolism

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Assessed through osteodensitometry

  52. Changes in muscular function

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Overall interpretation with 3 categories such as Normal/ Abnormal, not clinically significant/ Abnormal, clinically significant

  53. Occurrence of iron overload

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

  54. Fertility evaluation

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Assessed through hormonal testing

  55. Quality of life Evaluation: patient health

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 SF-36 The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. 0-100 scale so that a higher score indicates a better outcome.

  56. Quality of life Evaluation : fatigue

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    FACIT-Fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale) FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item self-report scale that assesses fatigue and its effect on daily activities and function. 0-52 scale so that a higher score indicates a better outcome.

  57. Quality of life Evaluation: physical , mental, and social health

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. PROMIS domain scores are reported as T-scores, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the reference population. Higher scores indicate better health for physical function and ability to participate in social roles and activities, whereas higher scores indicate worse health for fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep disturbance.

  58. Health-realted Quality of life Evaluation

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL ) Generic Core Scales PedsQL is a modular system that assesses health-related quality of life in healthy and ill children and adolescents. It combines generic core scales and disease-specific modules into one measurement system. 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better outcome.

  59. Walk ability

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    6-minute walk-test

  60. jump

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Vertical jump test : The jump height will be recorded using video analysis software. The average height of the 3 jumps will be calculated

  61. Physical ability

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    physical ability questionnaire, using the Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) (16 items) developed by WHO. Minimum value is 0 with no theoretical maximum value. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

  62. Cardiopulmonary capacity

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Cardiopulmonary exercise test, using the Cardio Pulmonary Exercise Test

  63. Costs

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Costs of treatment calculated yearly and cost per event (VOC and ATS)

  64. Cost effectiveness

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Model-based incremental cost effectiveness ratio of gene therapy with inputs for SoC

  65. Changes in cardiac global function

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Assessed through cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, using ventricular function - Overall interpretation with 3 categories such as Normal/ Abnormal, not clinically significant/ Abnormal, clinically significant

  66. Changes in myocardial tissular

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Using late gadolinium myocardial enhancement

  67. Changes in myocardial tissular

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Using native T1 mapping

  68. Changes in myocardial tissular

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Using extracellular volume

  69. Changes in myocardial tissular

    Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up

    Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Joseph LAURE, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

01 44 49 55 91 ext. +33

Nelly BRIAND, PHD

CONTACT

[email protected]

01 44 38 18 62 ext. +33

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Collaborators

  • Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM), Paris
  • Imagine Institute
  • Marie Lannelongue Hospital
  • URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin

Registry information

Acronym: Drepamir-soc

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2030
First posted
Aug 7, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.