Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Apheresis Unit
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75015, France
NCT Number: NCT07752043
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of transplantation of gene modified autologous CD34+ cells in SCD patients within a therapeutic strategy that may include anti-inflammatory treatment as a pre-transplant treatment in case of severe inflammation detected at the inclusion analysis; the autologous CD34+ cell will be transduced by the bifunctional βAS3m/miR7m lentiviral vector expressing the therapeutical beta-globin, βAS3m, and the miRNA anti-HbS vs Standard Of Care (SOC).
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified12 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75015, France
Sickle cell disease is a severe hemoglobinopathy characterized by anemia, chronic hemolysis, and vaso-occlusive crises, leading to high morbidity and mortality.
Medical management options or Standard Of Care (SOC) currently available for SCD include supportive management of VOC, long-term RBC transfusions, and foetal haemoglobin (HbF) induction with hydroxyurea (HU).
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is curative but available only for a minority of patients. Gene therapy approaches (gene addition or gene editing) have shown significant reductions in vaso-occlusive events, but residual hemolysis persists and their truly curative potential remains uncertain.
In France, the absence of a control arm in clinical trials has limited regulatory approval, supporting the development of the DREPAMIR protocol, which incorporates a Standard Of Care control group to better assess the efficacy clinical value and cost effectiveness of gene therapy in severe sickle cell disease.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of transplantation of gene modified autologous CD34+ cells in SCD patients within a therapeutic strategy that may include anti-inflammatory treatment as a pre-transplant treatment in case of severe inflammation detected at the inclusion analysis; the autologous CD34+ cell will be transduced by the bifunctional βAS3m/miR7m lentiviral vector expressing the therapeutical beta-globin, βAS3m, and the miRNA anti-HbS vs Standard Of Care (SOC).
Drepamir-SOC is the control arm of the main study DREPAMIR (NCT07432867)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
At least 3 vaso-occlusive crises requiring hospitalization, under hydroxyurea or transfusion, within 2 years prior to enrollment One severe acute chest syndrome (ACS) hospitalized in the intensive care unit At least 2 episodes of ACS, including one under HU. Acute priapism (at least 2 episodes >3h in the preceding year or in the year prior to the start of a regular transfusion program), OR stuttering priapism ≥ 1 by week under sickle cell treatment (HU, transfusion or phlebotomy).
Tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8m/s on cardiac echocardiograph without pulmonary hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization (mPAP><25mmHg)
Exclusion criteria
Evaluations within 6 months prior to screening visit:
Supportive management of VOC, long-term RBC transfusions, and foetal haemoglobin (HbF) induction with hydroxyurea (HU) Myocardic MRI (evaluation of function and fibrosis) + hematocrit measurement QoL questionnaires Imaging (brain MRI, transcranial and cervical ultrasound) Cardiac US, ECG Cardiac and Liver MRI (Fe assessment) Physical ability assessments Neuropsychological assessments Fertility
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: between 3 and 15 months following IV infusion of DREAM01 of the corresponding matched DREPAMIR patient
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Measure of HbS
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Measure of HbF
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Biological parameters that reflect hemolysis : Total hemoglobin, Reticulocytes, lactate dehydrogenase LDH, circulating erythroblasts, haptoglobin, free plasmatic heme, no conjugated bilirubin, erythropoietin EPO
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Biological parameters that reflect anemia : Total hemoglobin, Reticulocytes, lactate dehydrogenase LDH, circulating erythroblasts, haptoglobin, free plasmatic heme, no conjugated bilirubin, erythropoietin EPO
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
absence of vaso-occlusive events (VOE) in patients who have discontinued the transfusion program or/and hydroxyurea
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Occurrence of ischemic lesions, vascular stenosis, aneurysm assessed using cervical doppler ultrasound and cerebral MRI
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Occurrence of pathological flow acceleration or vascular stenosis using carotid and transcranial Doppler ultrasound
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Assessed Using Fundus examination
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Assessed Using angiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Evaluated through electrocardiographic (ECG) assessment : overall interpretation with 3 categories such as Normal/ Abnormal, not clinically significant/ Abnormal, clinically significant
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], right and left atrial, left assessed using cardiac ultrasound.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], right and left atrial, left assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], right and left atrial, left assessed using Doppler echocardiography.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Occurrence of left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], right and left atrial, left assessed using transthoracic echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in left ventricular size assessed using cardiac ultrasound.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in left ventricular size assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in left ventricular size assessed using Doppler echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in left ventricular size assessed using transthoracic echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in the left ventricular wall thickness assessed using cardiac ultrasound.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in the left ventricular wall thickness assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in the left ventricular wall thickness assessed using Doppler echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in the left ventricular wall thickness assessed using transthoracic echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP], assessed using cardiac ultrasound.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP], assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP], assessed using Doppler echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP], assessed using transthoracic echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV] assessed using cardiac ultrasound
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV] assessed using cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging)
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV] assessed using Doppler echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV] assessed using transthoracic echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Changes in of E/A ratio assessed using cardiac ultrasound, cardiac MRI (including myocardial imaging), Doppler echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Renal function assessed through estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using CKD-EPI equation
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
overall interpretation with 3 categories such as Normal/ Abnormal, not clinically significant/ Abnormal, clinically significant
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Assessed through osteodensitometry
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Overall interpretation with 3 categories such as Normal/ Abnormal, not clinically significant/ Abnormal, clinically significant
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Assessed through hormonal testing
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 SF-36 The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. 0-100 scale so that a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
FACIT-Fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale) FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item self-report scale that assesses fatigue and its effect on daily activities and function. 0-52 scale so that a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. PROMIS domain scores are reported as T-scores, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the reference population. Higher scores indicate better health for physical function and ability to participate in social roles and activities, whereas higher scores indicate worse health for fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep disturbance.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL ) Generic Core Scales PedsQL is a modular system that assesses health-related quality of life in healthy and ill children and adolescents. It combines generic core scales and disease-specific modules into one measurement system. 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
6-minute walk-test
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Vertical jump test : The jump height will be recorded using video analysis software. The average height of the 3 jumps will be calculated
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
physical ability questionnaire, using the Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) (16 items) developed by WHO. Minimum value is 0 with no theoretical maximum value. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Cardiopulmonary exercise test, using the Cardio Pulmonary Exercise Test
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Costs of treatment calculated yearly and cost per event (VOC and ATS)
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Model-based incremental cost effectiveness ratio of gene therapy with inputs for SoC
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Assessed through cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, using ventricular function - Overall interpretation with 3 categories such as Normal/ Abnormal, not clinically significant/ Abnormal, clinically significant
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Using late gadolinium myocardial enhancement
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Using native T1 mapping
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Using extracellular volume
Time frame: Up to the 24 months follow-up
Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Joseph LAURE, MD, PhD
CONTACT
01 44 49 55 91 ext. +33
Nelly BRIAND, PHD
CONTACT
01 44 38 18 62 ext. +33
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Acronym: Drepamir-soc
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03814746
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04662931
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Guwahati, Assam, India
View Trial DetailsNCT03264989
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Orange, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03478917
Acute Chest Syndrome, Anemia
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details