Sigma CR150
DeviceSigma CR150 femoral component used in combination with the Highly Polished Cobalt Chrome fixed bearing tibial tray and the Curved (XLK) polyethylene bearing (cemented, no patellar resurfacing).
Other names: PFC Sigma CR150
NCT Number: NCT01418378
This study will compare two very similar designs of knee replacement device. One device (Sigma CR150) is a slightly modified version of the original (Sigma CR) and has been modified to enhance/accommodate higher flexion. The original device has been in widespread clinical use with excellent results since 1996 and this study will determine whether the design modifications of the newer device add further value. The newer device has been in clinical use with good short-term(unpublished) outcomes since becoming commercially available in January 2009.
Achieving higher knee flexion may be required for cultural reasons or by the increasingly younger, more active patient population undergoing knee replacement today. In addition to promoting flexion, it is also possible that this design change may help the knee replacement to last longer than traditional implants in patients who achieve higher flexion. Therefore, the study will compare the two devices in terms of survivorship, flexion and other measures of the success of a total knee replacement (range of motion, knee-related quality of life, activity and generic quality of life) over the short-term.
A minimum of one hundred and forty subjects (minimum 70 per group) with osteoarthritis and aged 50-75 years will be included at UK/international hospitals.
Study duration is 2 years and patients will complete standard knee outcome scores plus radiological evaluation.
Subjects would receive one of the study devices regardless of their involvement in the study, and apart from (possible)additional visits, x-rays and/or questionnaires, treatment and follow-up care will be as per the care they would receive outside of the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Sunshine Hospitals, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
i)Male or female subjects, aged between 50 and 75 years inclusive.
ii)Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained.
iii) Subjects who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, are able to understand this clinical investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return to the hospital for all the required post-operative follow-ups.
iv) Subjects defined by the Investigator as ASA Grade I or II.
v) Subjects with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis.
vi) Subjects who require a primary total knee arthroplasty.
vii) Subjects who can achieve active flexion of 90 degrees.
Exclusion criteria
i) Subjects who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, have an existing condition that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this clinical investigation.
ii) Subjects who are known drug or alcohol abusers or with psychological disorders that could affect follow-up care or treatment outcomes.
iii) Subjects who have participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product in the last month.
iv) Subjects who are currently involved in any injury litigation claims.
v) Subjects with an anatomical limb alignment of above 20 degrees varus or valgus.
vi) Subjects with a fixed flexion deformity of over 20 degrees.
vii) Subjects with recurvatum (definition: hyperextension ≥ 5 degrees).
viii) Subjects who cannot flex their hip to 90 degrees.
ix) Subjects with a BMI of 35 or above.
x) Subjects defined by the Investigator as ASA Grade III-V.
xi) Subjects who are identified pre-operatively as having bone defects which require augmentation.
xii) Subjects who have previously undergone total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty, high tibial osteotomy, ligament reconstruction, ORIF or with previous fracture in the knee joint.
xiii) Subjects with primary or secondary diagnosis of inflammatory or traumatic arthritis.
xiv) Subjects who have undergone contralateral total knee arthroplasty during the previous 6 months.
xv) Subjects who in the opinion of the Investigator require patellar resurfacing.
Intra-operative exclusion criteria:
i) Subjects who have uncontained bone defects or defects bigger than 8 mm3 and/or require augmentation.
ii) Subjects who are not suitable to receive both the study and comparator devices.
iii) Subjects who require patellar resurfacing
Sigma CR150 femoral component used in combination with the Highly Polished Cobalt Chrome fixed bearing tibial tray and the Curved (XLK) polyethylene bearing (cemented, no patellar resurfacing).
Other names: PFC Sigma CR150
Sigma CR femoral component used in combination with the Highly Polished Cobalt Chrome fixed bearing tibial tray and the Curved (XLK) polyethylene bearing (cemented, no patellar resurfacing).
Other names: PFC Sigma CR
Time frame: 2 Years
The Kaplan-Meier success rate at 24-months post-operatively was calculated with Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methodology, where the time variable for patients who were successful (no components revised for any reason) was censored at the time of last follow-up.
Time frame: Pre-operative baseline to 2 years
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 2 year goniometer-measured passive flexion. A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg
Time frame: Pre-operative baseline to 1 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Pain Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (no pain) to 36 (extreme pain). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme pain) to 100 (no pain) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 36 = transformed score
Time frame: 2 years
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Pain Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (no pain) to 36 (extreme pain). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme pain) to 100 (no pain) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 36 = transformed score
Time frame: 1 years
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 year in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Symptom Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 36 (always have symptoms). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (always have symptoms) to 100 (never have symptoms) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 36 = transformed score
Time frame: 2 years
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Symptom Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (never have symptoms) to 28 (always have symptoms). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (always have symptoms) to 100 (never have symptoms) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 28 = transformed score
Time frame: 1 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Symptom Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 68 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 68 = transformed score
Time frame: 2 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Activities of Daily Living Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 68 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 68 = transformed score
Time frame: 1 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Activities of Daily Living Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 20 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 20 = transformed score
Time frame: 2 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Activities of Daily Living Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 20 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 20 = transformed score
Time frame: 1 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Activities of Quality of life Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 16 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 16 = transformed score
Time frame: 2 years
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Quality of Life Subscore
The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 16 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale.
100 - (score x 100) / 16 = transformed score
Time frame: 1 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 1 year goniometer-measured passive Flexion. A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg. Passive flexion involves moving the leg through range of motion without active muscle contraction
Time frame: 1 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 1 year goniometer-measured passive extension. A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg. Passive extension involves the leg being moved without active muscle contraction
Time frame: 2 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 2 year goniometer-measured passive extension. A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg. Passive extension involves moving the leg without active muscle contraction
Time frame: 1 year
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 1 year goniometer-measured total range of motion. A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg. Total range of motion is the full distance the lower leg travels in relation to the upper leg.
Time frame: 2 years
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 2 year goniometer-measured total range of motion. A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg. Total range of motion is the full distance the lower leg travels in relation to the upper leg.
Time frame: 1 years
Summary of flexion contracture at 1 year time point. Flexion contracture is a shortening of the muscles that prevents the leg from fully extending
Time frame: 2 years
Summary of flexion contracture at 2 year time point.Flexion contracture is a shortening of the muscles that prevents the leg from fully extending
Time frame: 1 year
Total Knee Society Knee Score change from baseline at 1 year
The Total Knee Society Score is comprised of two scores: the Knee Score and the Function Score. Both have a 0-100 range. Sub-scales are combined to compute a total score of 100
The Total Knee Society Score is made up of pain, range of motion, alignment and stability subscores. An Excellent score is 80-100, a good score is 70-79, a fair score is 60-69 and a poor score is anything below 60.
Time frame: 2 years
Total Knee Society Knee Score change from baseline at 2 years
The Total Knee Society Score is comprised of two scores: the Knee Score and the Function Score. Both have a 0-100 range. Sub-scales are combined to compute a total score of 100
The Total Knee Society Score is made up of pain, range of motion, alignment and stability subscores. An Excellent score is 80-100, a good score is 70-79, a fair score is 60-69 and a poor score is anything below 60.
Time frame: 1 year time point
Anatomic angle measured at 1 year time point.
If one draws a line from the center of the hip joint to the center of the ankle joint this is considered to be the mechanical axis of the femur.
A line drawn through the center of the femoral shaft is the anatomic axis.
The angle created at the intersection of these lines is referred to as the anatomic alignment angle.
A normal angle is approximately 7-9 degrees "valgus" or slightly "knock-kneed". "Varus" angles are less common and are also referred to as "bow-legged".
Time frame: 2 year time point
Anatomic angle measured at 2 year time point.
If one draws a line from the center of the hip joint to the center of the ankle joint this is considered to be the mechanical axis of the femur.
A line drawn through the center of the femoral shaft is the anatomic axis.
The angle created at the intersection of these lines is referred to as the anatomic alignment angle.
A normal angle is approximately 7-9 degrees "valgus" or slightly "knock-kneed". "Varus" angles are less common and are also referred to as "bow-legged".
Time frame: 1 year time point
Femoral component angle measured at 1 year time point. This angle is measured between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head and a line across the bottom of the femoral implant (condyles).
Time frame: 2 year time point
Femoral component angle measured at 2 year time point. This angle is measured between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head and a line across the bottom of the femoral implant (condyles).
Time frame: 1 year time point
Tibial component angle measured at 1 year time point. This angle is measured between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head tibial implant.
Time frame: 2 year time point
Tibial component angle measured at 2 year time point. This angle is measured between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head tibial implant.
Time frame: 1 year time point
Femoral Component Flexion measured at 1 year time point. This measures the angle between a line drawn though the center of the side of the femur and a line drawn across the top of the flat inner surface of the femoral component.
Time frame: 2 year time point
Alignment - Femoral Component Flexion measured at 2 year time point. This measures the angle between a line drawn though the center of the side of the femur and a line drawn across the top of the flat inner surface of the femoral component.
Time frame: 1 year time point
Tibial Posterior Slope measured at 1 year time point. This angle is measured between a line through the center of the side of the tibia and the top flat surface of the tibial implant
Time frame: 2 year time point
Alignment - Tibial Posterior Slope measured at 2 year time point. This angle is measured between a line through the center of the side of the tibia and the top flat surface of the tibial implant
Time frame: 6 to 12 week and 24 month intervals
The bone-implant interface at the femoral components were examined radiographically and radiolucencies were measured in millimeters.
Radiolucent lines (RLLs) greater than 2mm are considered to be clinically significant.
Time frame: 6 weeks to 24 months
The bone-implant interface at the tibial components were examined radiographically and radiolucencies were measured in millimeters.
Radiolucent lines (RLLs) greater than 2mm are considered to be clinically significant.
Radiolucent lines greater than 2mm are considered to be clinically significant.
Time frame: 1 year time point
Maximum knee flexion measured radiographically at 1 year time point
DePuy International
Industry
A Double-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Performance of the Sigma® CR150 and Sigma® CR Knee Systems, When Used in Fixed Bearing Primary Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02108496
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07720024
Arthritis, Blount disease
Pathum Thani, Changwat Pathum Thani, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT01818401
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Nantes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07710404
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details