Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02108496

Verifying the Effectiveness of the NUsurface® System

The NUsurface® Meniscus Implant Randomized Study is a multi-center, prospective randomized, interventional clinical trial to test the hypothesis that the NUsurface implant is superior to the non-surgical standard of care in treating the target population.The rationale for performing this clinical study is to gather clinical data to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the NUsurface device compared to the Standard of Care.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

OrthoIndy, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The NUsurface® Meniscus Implant is intended for use in patients with medial compartment pain that have had a previous partial medial meniscectomy.

Patients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be assigned by balanced randomization into one of two groups: the Meniscus Implants versus non-surgical standard of care. The KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) forms will be used to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the patients' pre-intervention and post-intervention condition including activity levels, pain, swelling, locking, stability, support, sports activity, and quality of life assessment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Had > 6 months ago a medial partial meniscectomy as confirmed by patient history and MRI
  • Is between age 30 and 75 years (inclusive) at the time of study treatment
  • Has neutral alignment ±5º of the mechanical axis, as measured from the angle formed by a line drawn from the center of the femoral head to the medial tibial spine and a line drawn from the medial tibial spine and the center of the ankle joint
  • Has ≥ 2 mm intact medial meniscal rim capable of being fitted with a NUsurface® device AND is also recommended for the baseline non-surgical (and, if likely to receive benefit, any injection) therapies to be administered in the study.
  • Is willing to be entered into either arm of the study: implanted with the NUsurface device OR treated with the recommended control arm therapies.
  • Is willing and able to attend all follow up visits, complete all study questionnaires, and undergo required X-ray and MRI schedule
  • Is able and willing to understand and sign the Informed Consent Form
  • Is able to read and understand the English language
  • Has a KOOS Pain of ≤ 75 (100 being the highest attainable and no pain)

Exclusion criteria

  • Has a symptomatic knee because of a tear that could be addressed by a repeat partial meniscectomy leaving > 4 mm of medial meniscus rim
  • Has evidence of a Outerbridge Grade IV cartilage loss on the medial tibial plateau or femoral condyle that potentially could contact a NUsurface implant (e.g., a focal lesion > 0.5 cm2 correlating to a circular defect of > 8 mm in diameter)
  • Has complete disruption of the posterior root attachment of the meniscus
  • Has lateral compartment pain and Grade III or Grade IV Outerbridge cartilage score in the lateral compartment
  • Has a varus or valgus knee deformity > 5º requiring a tibial or femoral osteotomy
  • Has a laxity level of more than Grade II (IKDC), primary or secondary to an injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and/or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and/or lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and/or medial collateral ligament (MCL)
  • Has significant trochlear dysplasia, patellar instability or symptomatic patellar misalignment
  • Has patellar compartment pain and Grade III or Grade IV Outerbridge cartilage score in the patellar compartment.
  • Compared to a normal knee, has obvious radiological evidence of medial femoral squaring, anatomical variance in the medial tibial plateau, or irregularly shaped cartilage surface
  • Had an ACL reconstruction performed < 9 months prior to study treatment
  • Has a BMI > 32.5 at the time of study treatment
  • Decides to receive (if eligible and an option) allograft medial meniscus transplantation
  • Received any type of prosthetic knee implant made of artificial non-resorbable plastic, metal or ceramic, not including the NUsurface® Meniscus Implant
  • Has a knee flexion contracture > 10º
  • Has flexion < 90º
  • Had a previous medial femoral condyle surgery (not including microfracture) or High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO)
  • Has insufficiency fractures or avascular necrosis of the medial compartment
  • Has an active infection or tumor (local or systemic)
  • Has any type of knee joint inflammatory disease including Sjogren's syndrome
  • Has neuropathic knee osteoarthropathy, also known as Charcot joint
  • Has any medical condition that does not allow possible arthroscopy of the knee
  • Has neurological deficit (sensory, motor, or reflex)
  • Is currently involved in another investigation of the lower extremity
  • Anticipates having another lower extremity surgery during the study period
  • Is contraindicated for hyaluronic acid injections (i.e., patients with known hypersensitivity [allergy] to hyaluronan [sodium hyaluronate] preparations); patients having knee joint infections or skin diseases or infections in the site of possible injections
  • Is contraindicated for corticosteroid injections (i.e., patients with allergy to any of the components or with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura)
  • Has received any corticosteroid knee injections ≤ 3 months prior to study treatment
  • Has chondrocalcinosis
  • Is on immunostimulating or immunosuppressing agents
  • Has ipsilateral or contralateral lower limb joint conditions that may affect ambulation or KOOS (e.g. have a leg length discrepancy > 2.5 cm [1 inch], causing a noticeable limp)
  • Is a female who is lactating, expecting, or is intending to become pregnant during the study period
  • Is an active smoker
  • Is mentally incapacitated (incapable of appraising or controlling conduct) or have mental disability (e.g., dementia or Alzheimer's)
  • Is a prisoner
  • Is a patient who has economic incentive not to improve

Treatment and study plan

NUsurface® Meniscus Implant

Device

The NUsurface Meniscus Implant is a Polycarbonate-Urethane (PCU)-based device reinforced with high tensile Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers. The product is available in different sizes, left and right, and with trials so as to allow the surgeon several size options for implantation. The NUsurface® Meniscus Implant, is designed to be conceptually analogous to the natural meniscus whose structural characteristics include a highly orientated collagen fiber network supports the large hoop stresses to produce better distribution of contact pressures within the knee joint. Restoring the distribution of joint loads post-meniscectomy is thought to reducing joint overload and to reducing pain.

NSAID's and Non-surgical Treatment Options

Drug

Non-prescription drugs, creams, vitamins, and supplements, Prescription or Non-Prescriptions NSAIDs, Non-weight bearing and/or open chain physical therapy or self-administered exercise

Intra-Articular Injections with Corticosteroids

Drug

Intra-articular injection of a corticosteroid, such as 40 mg of Triamcinolone (e.g. Aristocort or Kenalog).

Intra-Articular Injections with Hyaluronic Acid (HA)

Drug

Intra-articular injection of a hyaluronic acid treatment, such as SYNVISC® HA Injections.

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Success Composite Endpoint

    Time frame: 2 years

    Overall Success is a composite endpoint computed at 24-Months whereby a subject must satisfy the pre-defined KOOS goals (KOOS Success), must have completed 24 Months with no disqualifying surgical intervention, and must have completed 24 Months with no device fracture and no subluxation on MRI confirmation.

  2. Automatic Study Failure

    Time frame: 2 Years

    The automatic treatment failure of the Control Group during the first 24-month period is any surgical intervention of the index knee. The automatic treatment failure of the Investigational Group during the first 24-month period is device removal or MRI detection of a dislocation or device fracture.

  3. KOOS Success

    Time frame: 2 years

    KOOS Success is an element that contributes to Overall Success by computing KOOS Pain Subscale at 24 months compared to baseline, and KOOS Overall score at 24 months compared to baseline. Scores for each of the five subscales are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems. For a subject to have KOOS Success their KOOS measures must be: KOOSpain ≥ 86.1 at 24 Months AND KOOSoverall ≥ 86.2 at 24 Months. Alternatively, a subject can have KOOS Success if KOOSpain ∆ (improvement from Baseline) ≥ 20 points at 24 Months AND KOOSoverall ∆ ≥ 20 points at 24 Months AND KOOSpain ≥ 40 points at 24 Months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. KOOS Subscale - Pain

    Time frame: 2 Years

    The subscale results for KOOS Symptoms are converted to a 0 to 100 scale where 0 is the worse possible outcome and 100 is the best possible outcome.

  2. KOOS Subscale - Symptoms

    Time frame: 2 Years

    The subscale results for KOOS Symptoms are converted to a 0 to 100 scale where 0 is the worse possible outcome and 100 is the best possible outcome.

  3. KOOS Subscale - ADL

    Time frame: 2 Years

    The subscale results for KOOS Symptoms are converted to a 0 to 100 scale where 0 is the worse possible outcome and 100 is the best possible outcome.

  4. KOOS Subscale - Sports and Recreation

    Time frame: 2 Years

    The subscale results for KOOS Symptoms are converted to a 0 to 100 scale where 0 is the worse possible outcome and 100 is the best possible outcome.

  5. KOOS Subscale - Quality of Life

    Time frame: 2 Years

    The subscale results for KOOS Symptoms are converted to a 0 to 100 scale where 0 is the worse possible outcome and 100 is the best possible outcome.

  6. KOOS Overall Score

    Time frame: 2 Years

    Average of all 5 KOOS Subscales

  7. VAS Pain Score

    Time frame: 2 Years

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score is scored from the best lowest score of 0 to the worse pain score of 100.

  8. WOMET Normalized Score

    Time frame: 2 Years

    Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool is a disease specific quality of life measurement tool for patients with meniscal lesions. Each question is scored from 0 (most favorable condition) to 100 (least favorable condition).

    When combining all scores from the 16 possible questions, the best and least symptomatic score is 0, and the highest and most symptomatic score possible is 1600. The score may be reported as a total overall score, as a total score for each domain, or as a percentage of normal by subtracting the total score from 1600, dividing by 1600, and multiplying by 100. If the normalized score is used, then the least favorable condition is 0 and the most favorable condition is 100.

  9. IKDC Subjective Knee Score

    Time frame: 2 Years

    The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is a patient-reported measure of knee symptoms, function, and sports activity. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst symptoms/function and 100 represents the best; higher scores indicate a better outcome. The score is calculated by summing responses to the 18 items, then transforming to a 0-100 scale using: [(raw score - lowest possible raw score) / range of raw score] × 100. No subscale scores are reported.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Active Implants

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

The VENUS Clinical Study (Verifying the Effectiveness of the NUsurface® System) A Multi-centered, Prospective, Randomized, Interventional, Superiority Clinical Study

Acronym: VENUS

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Apr 9, 2014
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.