Hydroxyurea SDM Toolkit
BehavioralImplementation tools and visit decision aids
NCT Number: NCT03442114
The goal of the study is to understand how best to help parents of young children with sickle cell disease and their clinicians have a shared discussion about hydroxyurea (one that takes into account medical evidence and parent values and preferences). The study will compare two methods to help clinicians facilitate this-a clinician pocket guide and a clinician hydroxyurea shared decision making toolkit-in a group of parents of children ages 0-5 with sickle cell disease. The investigators hope that both methods lead to parents reaching a high-quality, well-informed decision. In addition, the team hopes to demonstrate that parents who experience a shared decision will have lower anxiety and decisional uncertainty. The researchers also expect these parents to be more likely to choose hydroxyurea and that their children will have less pain, fewer hospitalizations, better developmental outcomes, and higher quality of life. The project team hopes to show that the toolkit method is easy for clinicians to use and gives parents the support needed to make an informed decision.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 month–5 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
UCSF Beinoff Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland, Oakland, California, United States
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic blood disorder that places children at risk for serious medical complications, early morbidity and mortality, and high healthcare utilization. In the U.S., SCD primarily affects African-American and Latino children. Hydroxyurea is one of the only disease-modifying treatment for this devastating and life-threatening disease. National Evidence-Based Guidelines recommend the use of a shared decision making approach to offer hydroxyurea to all children with SCD as early as nine months of age. Hydroxyurea uptake remains low because parents lack information about hydroxyurea and have concerns about its safety and potential long-term side effects (e.g. cancer, infertility, birth defects). Clinicians do not have the training or tools to facilitate a shared discussion with parents that provides medical evidence and considers parent preferences and values. The current study compares two methods for disseminating hydroxyurea guidelines and facilitating shared decision-making: the American Society of Hematology's hydroxyurea clinician pocket guide (usual care method) and a clinician hydroxyurea shared decision-making toolkit (H-SDM toolkit). The specific aims of the study are to evaluate the effectiveness of the usual care dissemination method (clinician pocket guide) and the H-SDM clinician toolkit dissemination method on: parent report of decisional uncertainty (primary outcome chosen by parents of children with SCD), parent perception of experiencing shared decision-making, parent knowledge of hydroxyurea, the number of children offered hydroxyurea, hydroxyurea uptake (those with active prescriptions), and child health outcomes (pain, neurocognitive functioning, sickle cell related quality of life and healthcare utilization). Eligible children must be between the ages of 0 and 5 and a candidate for hydroxyurea to participate. The trial will use a stepped-wedge design (clinic is the unit of randomization). The long-term objective of the research team is to improve the quality of care for children with SCD. The investigators propose that suboptimal care for patients with SCD is preventable with the use of multicomponent dissemination methods if developed with key stakeholders and designed to address barriers to high quality care at multiple levels (patient, clinician, healthcare system, and community).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Implementation tools and visit decision aids
current hydroxyurea protocol and ASH pocket guide
Time frame: Baseline - after shared discussion with clinician
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a 16-item parent-completed survey that measures uncertainty experienced when feeling uninformed about options, unclear about personal values, or unsupported in making a choice. Parents report their level of agreement with each item using a 5 point likert scale (0=strongly agree to 4=strongly disagree). For the total score, items are summed, divided by 16, and multiplied by 25. All subscores consist of 3 items except the Effective Decisions subcore (4 items) that are summed, divided by the number of items (3 or4) and multiplied by 25.
Scores range from 0 (feels extremely certain about best choice) to 100 (feels extremely uncertain about best choice) on the total score and all subscores. Thus, a higher score indicates a high decisional conflict.
Time frame: Baseline visit - after shared discussion with clinician
Dyadic OPTION describes clinician behaviors to involve a patient/parent in decision-making. A total score is calculated which ranges from 0 (no involvement) to 100 (maximal involvement). Dyadic OPTION scores correlate well with OPTION scale (Melbourne et al., 2011); 1 item "My doctor and I made the decision together"(Légaré et al., 2010). Higher scores indicate that the patient/parent has higher shared decision making competencies.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented offering or prescription, whichever came first, assessed up to 7 months
1 of 3 responses - completed by the research coordinator based on review of electronic medical record (EMR) data: hydroxyurea was not offered, offered, or previously prescribed.
Time frame: Baseline after the shared discussion
Eight-item survey adapted from the Satisfaction With Decision scale 41 (4 items) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey related to patient experience of care (4 items). 42 Items are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.
Time frame: After discussion with clinician
This questionnaire is a reliable, accurate developmental and social-emotional screener for children between birth and 6 years of age, with a Cronbach α = .60 to .85. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating that the child's development is on schedule.
Time frame: After shared discussion with clinician
Parent report of sickle cell disease (SCD)-specific quality of life (QOL) and pain, as measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) SCD Module, which assesses several domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), including pain impact, fatigue, pain management, emotions, communication, and treatment adherence. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher HRQOL or higher functioning.
Time frame: After shared discussion with clinician
Eight-item survey developed based on the existing literature, the Ottawa Knowledge User Manual, and parent and clinician stakeholders and used in our pilot work. Items are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more knowledge.
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Other
Engaging Parents of Children With Sickle Cell Anemia and Their Providers in Shared-Decision Making for Hydroxyurea (ENGAGE HU)
Acronym: ENGAGE-HU
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00011648
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04255875
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01758042
AL Amyloidosis, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05169580
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details