Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06830499

Sapien 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Young Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients From China

Safety, effectiveness and durability of Sapien 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in young aortic valve stenosis patients from China:A multi-center, retrospective and prospective, single arm, observational study

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

50 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Currently TAVR indication has expanded to intermediate and low-risk patients from inoperable or high-risk patients, through a rigorous series of clinical trials comparing TAVR with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

Despite 2020 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines recommended SAVR for patients with symptomatic severe AS aged <65 years, the previous data from United States nationwide Vizient Clinical Data Base and Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Group Consortium (NNECDSG) registry demonstrated dramatic growth in TAVR utilization in younger patients aged <65 years from 2015 to 2021/2022, which is possibly driven by increased TAVR utilization in low surgical risk patients.

However, TAVR has never been systematically tested in young (<65 years old), low-risk patients, with many unanswered questions, especially the safety and effectiveness of TAVR in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and the durability of transcatheter heart valves. Furthermore, we noticed that the patients between 65 years old and 70 years old accounted for 23.3% of all the TAVR patients and this patient subgroup were underrepresented in the previous study, which makes it necessary to also explore the interested endpoints in this subgroup.

The aim of this study is to establish the safety and efficacy of Sapien 3 TAVR in young (50~70 years old) Chinese patients with severe symptomatic AS, including Type-1 bicuspid population and to explore the durability performance of Sapien 3 in this cohort.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet ALL of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for participation:

  • 50 years of age or older but ≤70 years old at time of consent.
  • Severe AS, defined as follows:

a) For symptomatic patients: i) Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), OR mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg, OR Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest b) For asymptomatic patients: i) Very severe AS with an aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND maximal aortic velocity ≥5.0 m/sec, or mean gradient ≥60 mm Hg by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, OR ii) Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND a mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND an exercise tolerance test that demonstrates a limited exercise capacity, abnormal BP response, or arrhythmia OR iii) Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND a left ventricular ejection fraction <50%.

  • Tricuspid aortic valve stenosis and type-1 bicuspid aortic valve anatomy confirmed by MDCT.
  • The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
  • Adequate iliofemoral access and acceptable level of vessel calcification and tortuosity for safe device implant.
  • The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects are NOT eligible for participation if they meet ANY of the following exclusion criteria:

  • Any of the following: a. no calcification; b. challenging calcification based on physician's experience and discretion (Case Review Board would decide whether to exclude challenging calcification cases).
  • Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid valve, congenital Type-0 or Type-2 bicuspid valve, or quadricuspid valve.
  • Severe femoral, iliac or aortic atherosclerosis, calcification, coarctation, aneurysm or tortuosity, which prevents transfemoral TAVR.
  • Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days), with evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with acute myocardial ischemia.
  • Need for open heart surgery (including severe aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation or stenosis, or tricuspid regurgitation, congenital heart disease, AF, complex coronary artery disease).
  • Aortic disease: a. bicuspid aortic valve with an ascending aorta diameter ≥ 45mm b. tricuspid aortic valve with an ascending aorta diameter ≥ 50mm.
  • Pre-existing mechanical or bioprosthetic valve in any position.
  • Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of the screening visit.
  • Emergency interventional/surgical procedures within 30 days of the valve implant procedure.
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction.
  • Ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 30%.
  • Cardiac imaging (echo, CT, and/or MRI) evidence of ventricular mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  • Inability (including allergy) to heparin, iodine contrast agent, warfarin or NOAC, aspirin or clopidogrel.
  • Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 180 days of the valve implant procedure.
  • Renal replacement therapy at the time of screening.
  • Severe lung disease (FEV1 < 50% predicted) or currently on home oxygen.
  • Estimated life expectancy < 24 months.
  • Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials. Observational studies are not considered exclusionary.

Treatment and study plan

transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Procedure

TAVR procedure was performed according to standard clinical practice. Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device and successful retrieval of the delivery system will be attempted. Vascular access site will be through transfemoral on the basis of pre-procedural evaluation of access site vessel. The procedure will be performed under local or general anesthesia and per clinical practice standard.

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: At 5 years

    The primary end point is the 5 year all-cause mortality

Secondary outcomes

  1. The composite of all-cause mortality, stroke and rehospitalization

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, rehospitalization (procedure, valve and heart failure related) at 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

  2. The composite of device success

    Time frame: At 30 days

    The composite of device success at 30 days comprising the following: freedom from mortality, successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system, correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication, intended performance of the valve (mean gradient <20 mmHg, peak velocity <3 m/s, Doppler velocity index ≥0.25, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation), according to the VARC-3 definition

  3. The durability performance of Sapien 3

    Time frame: At 1, 3, 5 years

    The durability performance of Sapien 3 at 1, 3, 5 years: bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD, including SVD, non-SVD, endocarditis and thrombosis), moderate or severe hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD), bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) according to the VARC-3 definition, EOA/mean gradient (MG) change over follow up

  4. Annular rupture

    Time frame: At 1 day of discharge

    The incidence of annular rupture

  5. Paravalvular leakage

    Time frame: At 1 day of discharge, 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of paravalvular leakage

  6. Technical success

    Time frame: At exit from procedure room

    Technical success (at exit from procedure room):

    • freedom from mortality
    • successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system
    • correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
    • freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication
  7. Procedural success

    Time frame: At 30 days

    Procedural success at 30 days defined as meeting all of the following:

    • Device success
    • No device or procedure related SAE's as follows:
    • Life-threatening bleed (BARC 3b or greater)
    • Major vascular or cardiac structural complications requiring unplanned reintervention or surgery
    • Stage 2 or 3 AKI (includes new dialysis)
    • MI or need for PCI/CABG
    • Severe heart failure or hypotension requiring IV inotrope >12 hours, ultrafiltration or mechanical circulatory support
    • Prolonged intubation > 48 hours
    • Need for a permanent pacemaker implant or continuous, new onset atrial fibrillation
  8. Mortality (all cause & cardiovascular)

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of mortality (all cause & cardiovascular)

  9. Stroke (disabling and nondisabling)

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of stroke (disabling and nondisabling)

  10. Rehospitalization (procedure, valve and heart failure related)

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of rehospitalization (procedure, valve and heart failure related)

  11. Major vascular complication

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of major vascular complication

  12. Major or life-threatening bleeding

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of major or life-threatening bleeding

  13. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of myocardial infarction

  14. Acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3

  15. Need for a permanent pacemaker

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation

  16. New onset atrial fibrillation

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of new onset atrial fibrillation

  17. Valve endocarditis

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of valve endocarditis

  18. Valve thrombosis

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of valve thrombosis

  19. New York Heart Association class

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The changes in New York Heart Association class

  20. Patient-prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch

  21. Health status as evaluated by Quality of Life questionnaires - KCCQ

    Time frame: At baseline, 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

    The changes in Health status as evaluated by Quality of Life questionnaires - KCCQ

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jian Yang, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+8613892828016

Meng en Zhai, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+8617782801836

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Xijing Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
  • West China Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Safety, Effectiveness and Durability of Sapien 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Young Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients From China

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2031
Study completion
2031
First posted
Feb 17, 2025
Registry last updated
May 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.