Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00484562

Prospective Study Comparing Different Modalities of Oxygen Delivery During Assessment of Functional Exercise Capacity

Objectives:

The objective of this study is to determine if any differences exist between the varying modes of portable oxygen delivery systems including liquid oxygen, a portable concentrator, portable devices filled at home from a concentrator, and medical grade compressed oxygen (either an M6 size or D size cylinder).

Hypothesis:

Patients who are prescribed LTOT will show similar physiologic responses to exercise when using differing modalities of portable oxygen delivery systems.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Harry S Truman Veterans Administration Medical Center

Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States

About this study

There are over 900,000 individuals currently utilizing Long Term Oxygen Therapy (LTOT) in this country. LTOT is administered by using one or a combination of three basic delivery systems: compressed gas cylinder, liquid oxygen system, and oxygen concentrator. Each of the base oxygen delivery systems has unique advantages and disadvantages regarding operation, function, and cost.

The majority of LTOT users require oxygen during ambulation. Within the home this is accomplished by a 20-50-foot extension tubing. Extending the length of the tubing allows the user (patient) to ambulate up to the extended distance from the base oxygen delivery system. Limitations are of course, the distance, becoming entangled in the tubing and it is not conducive for short trips such as to the mailbox.

Ambulation outside the home, however, requires the use of a "portable oxygen system". Put simplistically, portable oxygen systems are miniaturized versions of the base systems. Here also, each particular delivery system has inherent advantages and disadvantages.

An important development in portable oxygen systems has been the advent of pulse-dose technology. Pulse-dose technology allows both the gaseous and liquid portable systems to conserve oxygen delivery. During the inspiratory phase of breathing a solenoid control valve opens "dosing" a bolus of gas flow through the cannula. Unlike traditional continuous-flow cannula, where oxygen is delivered during both the inspiratory and expiratory cycle, pulse-dose technology only delivers oxygen during in an inspiratory phase of breathing. Oxygen flow that is delivered only during inspiration results in less total oxygen consumption. This in-turn allows relatively small portable oxygen systems to be more efficient and last longer. Such efficiency is not only important to the patient, but also to the Home Medical Equipment (HME) provider. Portable oxygen systems that incorporate pulse-dose technology typically decrease the home visits required to deliver to replenish the patient's oxygen supply.

One portable technology allows the patient to refill small oxygen devices in their home, but uses electricity (battery or AC) for functionality, providing economic hardship for some patients who are prescribed LTOT. Another portable technology is an actual portable oxygen concentrator that is lightweight and operates on electricity as well.

By comparison, the oxygen delivered to patients by HME providers, in either cylinder or liquid form, is an indirect product of liquefaction of air. Stringent FDA repackaging production and transfilling processes must be met. Strength and purity testing requires such "medical grade" oxygen be at least 99.5% pure. Such medical grade oxygen containers typically result in 100% oxygen being provided to the participant.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (18 years of age and older)
  • Current users of prescribed LTOT
  • Patients who meet the Category IV classification (Very Severe) of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)
  • Medicare criteria for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT)
  • Exhibit dyspnea on exertion while breathing room air
  • No exacerbation of COPD within previous 6 weeks, a resting oxygen saturation of less than 90% on room air (no supplemental oxygen) and receiving LTOT with a pulse-dose generator as prescribed by a physician

Exclusion criteria

  • Children (persons under age 18), fetuses, neonates, pregnant women, prisoners
  • Unstable angina during the previous month
  • Myocardial infarction during the previous month
  • Resting heart rate of > 120
  • Systolic blood pressure of >180mmHg
  • Diastolic blood pressure of >100 mmHg
  • Physical limitations which render the participant unable to walk

Treatment and study plan

Standard oxygen delivery system

Device

Standard oxygen tank with pulse dose regulator

Homefill oxygen delivery system

Device

Homefill oxygen delivery system, pre-filled from a larger oxygen concentrator base unit.

Helios oxygen delivery system

Device

Liquid oxygen portable system pre-filled from a larger liquid oxygen tank

FreeStyle oxygen system

Device

portable battery-powered oxygen concentrator delivery system

Primary outcomes

  1. Determination of ability to maintain adequate oxygenation

    Time frame: course of study: 3 hours

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Missouri-Columbia

Other

Collaborators

  • Tyco Healthcare Group

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Multi-arm Repeated Measures Prospective Study Comparing Different Modalities of Portable Oxygen Delivery During Assessment of Functional Exercise Capacity

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2006
First posted
Jun 11, 2007
Registry last updated
Oct 4, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.