Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03794921

COPD Access to Pulmonary Rehabilitation Intervention

Persons with COPD have significant functional disability but cannot access rehabilitative treatment at hospital-based conventional pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs. This project will determine whether an Internet-mediated, pedometer-based walking program can increase physical activity in persons with COPD who qualify for but cannot access PR, compared to usual care. This proposal has high potential to deliver an immediate solution to a pressing clinical need. The proposed research addresses Rehabilitation R&D Service's current priority area of improving disabled Veterans' health-related quality of life by reducing disease burden and maximizing functional recovery.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Boston, Massachusetts, 02130-4817, United States

About this study

Conventional pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs are highly effective and the standard of care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). PR faces two significant problems: (1) most patients with COPD who would benefit from PR cannot access it, and 2) there is no effective long-term strategy to maintain physical activity (PA) and benefits after completing PR. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of a technology-mediated intervention to increase PA in persons with COPD who qualify for but cannot access conventional, hospital-based PR. COPD is a leading cause of death in the United States; an estimated 16 million Americans have COPD. Despite maximal medical therapy, patients with COPD characteristically experience breathlessness, which leads to a downward spiral of sedentary behavior, physical inactivity, deconditioning, and functional disability. Low physical activity is associated with poor outcomes in COPD--increased risk of acute exacerbations, hospitalizations, and death, independent of lung function. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend regular PA for all patients with COPD. Conventional, supervised PR programs clearly reduce breathlessness, and improve health-related quality of life (HRQL) and exercise capacity. However, PR programs face significant challenges of access and adherence. The investigators developed Every Step Counts (ESC), a technology-mediated intervention based on the Behavioral Theory of Self-Regulation, to target sedentary behavior, promote PA, and alleviate deconditioning. ESC couples a website with a pedometer to directly monitor step counts. The website provides individualized step-count goals, iterative feedback, education on disease self-management, motivation, and an online community of social support. In two randomized studies in Veterans with COPD, the investigators demonstrated ESC's safety, feasibility, and efficacy to increase PA. Accessible via the internet and available at any time from home, ESC could be an ideal low-cost platform to address the limitations of conventional PR. The investigators hypothesize that ESC may be an efficacious strategy to promote PA in the many patients who cannot attend a PR program.

Primary Aim 1: Determine the efficacy of a web-based intervention, ESC, to increase PA (measured directly with an accelerometer and a questionnaire that assesses intensity), compared to usual care, in persons with COPD who are referred to or eligible for conventional PR but who cannot access it.

Secondary Aim 2: Estimate the effect of the ESC intervention on (a) exercise self-efficacy, (b) HRQL, (c) dyspnea, (d) depression, and (e) risk of acute exacerbations and COPD-related hospitalizations, compared to usual care.

All study visits are performed either in-person or remotely starting September, 2021.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

are:

  • Male and female subjects, greater than or equal to 40 years of age
  • Clinical diagnosis of COPD defined as: 1 of the following as testing-based evidence of COPD (any documented FEV1/FVC < 0.70, chest CT evidence of emphysema) AND at least 2 of the following as clinical evidence of COPD (≥ 10 pack-year cigarette smoking history, taking an antimuscarinic inhaler such as ipratropium or tiotropium, diagnosis of COPD written in a provider's note or on problem list)
  • Have declined participation in a conventional pulmonary rehabilitation program
  • Medical clearance from healthcare provider to participate in an exercise program
  • Have Internet connection and Bluetooth capability, and access to video platform Cisco Webex#
  • Answer yes to "Does your shortness of breath interfere with your functioning?"
  • Answer no to "Are you interested in joining PR now? If they answer yes, they will be ineligible and the PI will place a consult to PR for further evaluation
  • Competent to provide informed consent
  • Willingness to make return visits and be available by telephone for duration of study

Exclusion criteria

are:

  • COPD exacerbation in the previous 1 month
  • Prescribed supplemental oxygen for activity+
  • Inability to ambulate with or without assistance
  • Use of assistive device for walking such as cane or walker*
  • Inability to complete questionnaires
  • Inability to collect at least 7 of 10 days of baseline step counts
  • Participation in a pulmonary rehabilitation program at time of screening or within the previous 3 months
  • Participation in another exercise-related research study at time of screening
  • Plans to participate in an exercise-related research study in the next 3 months
  • Average baseline step counts of greater than or equal to 10,000 steps per week
  • For those who wish to participate virtually.
  • If participant has an in-person visit, oxygen will be assessed during the 6MWT to determine if subject's oxygen is stable during activity. If a participant has an in-person visit and oxygen is documented during the 6MWT and stays above 85%, he/she will be eligible to participate.
  • If a participant uses an assistive walking device but we have previously shown that the Fitbit pedometer is accurate in him/her (before the study was transitioned to virtual) he/she will be allowed to participate in the study. If a participant has an in-person visit and Fitbit accuracy is documented during use of the assistive device he/she will be eligible to participate.

Treatment and study plan

Every Step Counts

Other

Pedometer coupled to a website that provides step-count goals, feedback, education, motivation, and social support.

Primary outcomes

  1. Physical Activity Measured as Change in Average Daily Step Count

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    Daily Step Count was directly measured with a wearable monitoring device. Change in daily step count at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Exercise Self-Regulatory Efficacy Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    Assessed by the Exercise Self-Regulatory Efficacy Scale questionnaire. 16-item questionnaire. Participants indicate their confidence level from 0% (not at all confident) to 100% (highly confident). Change in EX-SRES score at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  2. Disease Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    Assessed by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. The investigators will use the Total Score which ranges from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing better health related quality of life. Change in total score at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  3. Shortness of Breath Rating as Perceived by the Participant Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale ranges from 0 to 4, with higher numbers representing more shortness of breath. Change at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  4. Depression Self-reported on Questionnaire Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    Depression measured by the Beck's Depression Inventory-II questionnaire. 21-items. Scores range with 0 to 63 with higher scores representing greater severity of depression. Change in score at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  5. CHAMPS Physical Activity Questionnaire Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    Self-reported PA will be assessed with The Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) Physical Activity questionnaire, a 41-item measure of the frequency and duration of PA over a typical week over the past four weeks that is used to calculate estimated caloric expenditure per week. Change in score at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  6. Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) Questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    Self-reported physical activity intensity was measured with the 7-item Rapid Assessment of PA (RAPA) questionnaire. Levels placed into three categories based on the highest physical activity level affirmatively endorsed: sedentary (score=1), underactive (score=2-5), and active (score >6) at 12 weeks compared to baseline.

  7. Healthcare Utilization Represented by Number of Hospitalizations Over Timeframe

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Hospitalization History. Assessment of total number of all cause hospitalizations over the timeframe of 12 weeks based on self-report.

  8. Healthcare Utilization Represented by Number of Acute Exacerbations Over Timeframe

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Acute Exacerbation History. Assessment of total number of acute exacerbations (AEs) over the timeframe of 12 weeks based on self-report.

Other outcomes

  1. Health Utilities Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    EuroQoL 5-Dimension Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Health Utilities. The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions (i.e. an EQ-5D health state or profile) can be converted into a single number called an index value. The index value reflects how good or bad the health state is according to the preferences of the general population of the United States. Scale ranges from -0.573 to 1 for the United States, with -0.573 indicating the worst health state and 1 indicating the best health state. Change in score at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  2. Number of Participants Who Plan to Enroll in Conventional Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Participating in the Research Study

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Numbers were assessed by self-report.

  3. COPD Knowledge Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire was used. 13-items that usually takes between 10 and 20 minutes to complete. Percent of questions scored correctly is assessed and range from 0 to 100 %. Change in score at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  4. Sleepiness Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    Epworth Sleepiness Scale was used. 8 questions, each on a scale of 0-3. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 24.

    0-5 Lower Normal Daytime Sleepiness 6-10 Higher Normal Daytime Sleepiness 11-12 Mild Excessive Daytime Sleepiness 13-15 Moderate Excessive Daytime Sleepiness 16-24 Severe Excessive Daytime Sleepiness. Change in score at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  5. Social Support Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    MOS Social Support Survey was used. 18 items with scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater social support. Change in score at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  6. General Health-Related Quality of Life Measured as Change Score

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    The Veterans RAND-36 is a 36-item self-report measure of general HRQL in U.S. Veterans based on the original RAND SF-36. Items assess participants' perception of their physical and mental health. Physical health (PCS) and mental health (MCS) component scores will be calculated as t scores normed to the general U.S. Veteran population with a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health outcomes. Change score at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

  7. Change in 6-Minute Walk Test Distance

    Time frame: 12 weeks compared to baseline

    In-clinic test that measures exercise capacity. Change in 6MWT distance at 12 weeks compared to baseline from the adjusted mixed model.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Fed

Registry information

Official study title

Leveraging Technology to Address Access and Adherence to Conventional Hospital-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Veterans With COPD

Acronym: CAPRI

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 7, 2019
Registry last updated
Apr 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.