Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07345559

Personalisation of Mean Arterial Pressure in Adult Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by inadequate cardiac output, leading to organ hypoperfusion and high mortality. Maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) is crucial, but standard targets may be insufficient due to venous congestion. Central venous pressure (CVP) can help assess effective perfusion pressure. This study investigates whether a personalized MAP target adjusted by CVP improves organ function and survival compared to standard MAP management.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

CHU d'Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Cardiogenic shock is a severe and life-threatening condition. Its prognosis remains very poor with a high mortality rate (up to 50% in clinical series) despite recent therapeutic advances. Current recommendations suggest the use of inotropes and vasopressors to maintain tissue perfusion and prevent organ failure.

During cardiogenic shock, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) level is associated with survival. A post hoc analysis of a recent randomized trial found increased mortality among patients in cardiogenic shock whose average MAP was <70 mmHg during the first 36 hours after randomization, compared to patients with MAP ≥70 mmHg (58% vs. 29%, p<0.01). Another observational study found higher mortality among patients with a mean MAP <65 mmHg during the first 24 hours of shock compared to those with MAP ≥65 mmHg (57% vs. 28%, p<0.001). In this study, the incidence of renal failure was also inversely associated with MAP level. The optimal MAP target remains unknown during cardiogenic shock.

Due to the characteristic venous congestion, the effective perfusion pressure may be very low during cardiogenic shock despite MAP being within the usual target (65 mmHg). Furthermore, increased central venous pressure (CVP) is associated with higher mortality during cardiogenic shock. Considering venous congestion by measuring or estimating CVP is necessary to assess the effective perfusion pressure (MAP minus CVP) in order to protect against organ dysfunction. In this perspective, the MAP target should be increased by the value of the CVP.

The investigators hypothesize that personalizing the MAP target (to achieve an effective perfusion pressure of 65 mmHg) improves organ perfusion and survival during cardiogenic shock compared to the usual MAP target of 65 mmHg.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Cardiogenic shock state, according to the consensus definition,
  • SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions) classification ≥ C
  • Consent from the patient or close relative / trusted person or emergency inclusion procedure
  • Benefiting fromciary of a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

  • Catecholamine infusion for more than 24 consecutive hours;
  • CVP < 5 mm Hg at inclusion;
  • MAP > 70 mmHg at inclusion;
  • Chronic kidney disease stage G4 (defined by an eGFR between 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m²) or G5 (defined by an eGFR less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m²) according to the KDIGO CKD classification at inclusion;
  • Chronic dialysis or presence of renal replacement therapy criteria at inclusion ;
  • Recovered cardiopulmonary arrest within 7 days prior to inclusion;
  • Patient already on mechanical circulatory support at inclusion before enrollment (patients who receive support after inclusion will not be excluded);
  • Primary diagnosis of tamponade, pulmonary embolism, or septic shock;
  • Hypersensitivity to norepinephrine tartrate or to any of the following excipients: sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide water for injectable preparations;
  • Absence of central venous access;
  • Known pregnancy or current breastfeeding;
  • Under legal guardianship, curatorship, or judicial protection.

Treatment and study plan

Personalized MAP

Other

Patients receive blood pressure management targeting a personalized MAP ranging from 65 mmHg + CVP to 75 mmHg + CVP, without exceeding 90 mmHg.CVP is measured via a central venous catheter positioned in the superior vena cava. After 48 hours, if tissue perfusion is restored, the MAP target may be reduced to 65-70 mmHg.

Standard MAP

Other

Patients receive blood pressure management aiming for a standard MAP target of 65-70 mmHg, according to international guidelines for cardiogenic shock management.

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary endpoint will be a composite of mortality, use of cardiac mechanical circulatory support, and severe renal failure.

    Time frame: 7 days and 28 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU), and in hospital

    Time frame: 28 days and 90 days after randomization

  2. Length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital

    Time frame: 28 days and 90 days after randomization

  3. Proportion of patients requiring cardiac mechanical circulatory support

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

  4. Proportion of patients requiring renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

  5. Proportion of patients with severe acute kidney injury (stage 2 and stage 3 according to KDIGO AKI classification)

    Time frame: 7 days after randomization

    Defined as stage 2 or stage 3 according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury classification

  6. Duration of inotrope and vasopressor support

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

  7. Use of mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

  8. Number of ventilator-free days

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

  9. Evolution of the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS)

    Time frame: 5 days after randomization

    The clinical outcome is defined based on the Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS), according to published standard references

  10. Evolution of lactate levels

    Time frame: 5 days after randomization

  11. Evaluation of mottling score

    Time frame: 5 days after randomisation

  12. Evaluation of capillary refill time

    Time frame: 5 days after randomization

  13. Evaluation of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score

    Time frame: 5 days after randomization

    The clinical outcome is defined based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, according to published standard references

  14. Proportion of patients with sustained ventricular and/or supraventricular arrhythmias

    Time frame: 5 days after randomization

  15. Proportion of patients with stroke, non-cerebral ischemia, new or recurrent myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

  16. Proportion of patients with major bleeding, defined according to the ISTH classification

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

    Defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) classification.

  17. Net clinical benefit at D28 (survival without thrombotic event or major bleeding).

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

  18. Proportion of patients receiving new specific treatments after randomization during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Armand MEKONTSO DESSAP, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+ 33 1 45 17 85 06

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

CMC Ambroise Paré

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Trial Assessing the Personalization of Mean Arterial Pressure in Adult Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

Acronym: CARDIOPAM

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Jan 15, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.