Mayo Clinic, 1216 Second Street SW
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07656259
Cardiac disease complicated by respiratory insufficiency comprises the most frequent indication for cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) admission, with nearly one-third patients requiring advanced respiratory support and over 20% patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). IMV among patients with impaired cardiovascular reserve is further compounded by the adverse impact of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and systemic sedation on intracardiac hemodynamics, pulmonary vascular mechanics and consequently end-organ perfusion. Despite widespread use, evidence guiding optimal ventilatory practices and mode selection in cardiovascular intensive care unit patients remains limited. Pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation may differ in their effects on patient-ventilator synchrony, sedation requirements, and hemodynamic impact, but comparative data among patients with critical cardiac disease remains inconclusive. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of implementing a pragmatic cluster-randomized crossover trial comparing ventilatory modes in a contemporary cardiovascular intensive care unit.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Eligible adults ≥ 18 years of age admitted to the cardiac ICU with need for invasive mechanical ventilation of expected duration >12 hours.
Pre-Specified Subgroups for exploratory outcomes:
Exclusion criteria
Volume-controlled mode for continuous mandatory ventilation with preset inspiratory flow and tidal volume.
Pressure-controlled mode for continuous mandatory ventilation with preset inspiratory pressure above positive end-expiratory pressure.
Time frame: Enrollment to 48 hours
Percentage of time spent on the assigned study mode while receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the cardiac ICU between enrollment and 48 hours after enrollment.
Time frame: Enrollment to 48 Hours
Time (number of hours) taken to initiate participants from enrollment (cardiac ICU admission) to initiation of assigned study mode of invasive mechanical ventilation upto 48 hours after enrollment.
Time frame: Enrollment to Study Day 28
All-cause, 28-day, in-hospital mortality, defined as death from any cause occurring between enrollment and 28 days after enrollment.
Time frame: Enrollment to Study Day 28
The number of calendar days between enrollment and 28 days after enrollment, on which the patient is alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation.
Time frame: Enrollment to Study Day 28
The number of calendar days between enrollment and 28 days after enrollment, on which the patient is alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, mechanical circulatory and vasoactive medication support.
Time frame: Enrollment to 48 hours
The Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) is a quantitative measure of the total cardiovascular support a patient receives through vasopressors and inotropes, by a standardized conversion to per-kilogram per-minute units. Higher VIS indicates greater dependence on pharmacologic support and is associated with worse outcomes.
Time frame: Enrollment to Study Day 28
Number of days between enrollment and 28 days after enrollment, on which the patient is alive and free from intensive care unit admission after the final transfer out of the intensive care unit
Time frame: Enrollment to 48 hours
Number of participants with flow, trigger or cycle dyssynchrony during assigned study mode for invasive mechanical ventilation.
Time frame: Enrollment to 48 hours
Measured in mL/kg of predicted body weight
Time frame: Enrollment to 48 hours
RASS is a 10-point scale of agitation or sedation ranging from -5 (most sedated, comatose) to +4 (most agitated, combative). The sedation requirement for each ventilator mode will be assessed via RASS score.
Mayo Clinic
Other
COMPARE-VENT Feasibility Pilot Study: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial for Ventilation Strategies and Hemodynamic Impact in Critically Ill Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06333379
Aspergillosis, Aspergillosis, Invasive Pulmonary
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT02973243
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bangor, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT02983565
Respiration Disorders, Respiration Failure
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT02963142
Community Acquired Pneumonia, Community-Acquired Infections
Paddington, United Kingdom
View Trial Details