Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation CCV Hôpital Cardiologique Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Lille
Lille, NORD, 59000, France
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Julien Tabareau
CONTACT
Mouhamed D Moussa, MD
CONTACT
=33659248780
NCT Number: NCT05699005
This multicenter randomized controlled trial compare two transfusion strategies of red blood cells transfusion in patients supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock.
An individualized transfusion strategy based on ScVO2 level, is compared to a conventionnal strategy based on predefined hemoglobin threshold. The primary endpoint is the consumption of packed red blod cells, secondary endpoints are subgroup analysis, mortality, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Lille, NORD, 59000, France
Location status: Recruiting
Julien Tabareau
CONTACT
Mouhamed D Moussa, MD
CONTACT
=33659248780
Peripheral VA-ECMO is the mainstay of mechanical circulatory support in refractory cardiogenic shock. This treatment is associated with a high consumption of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), which can reach 1 to 3 units of PRBCs per day of support. The main reasons for such a high consumption of PRBCs are the very frequent hemorrhagic complications and the prevalence of anemias not directly related to the hemorrhagic episodes. These anemias are frequent during VA-ECMO support owing to hemolysis, hemodilution, previous bleeding episodes, thrombosis, etc.
In order to restore, maintain, or increase oxygen delivery (DO2) to peripheral organs, RGCs are often performed when anemia is observed. Several studies have reported an association between transfusion of these PRBCs with morbidity and mortality in this ECMO setting.
There is no appropriate strategy to reduce PRBC consumption, taking into account other determinants of DO2. In addition, there is currently no validated or consensus hemoglobin threshold to guide transfusion in this specific population. Furthermore, this predefined threshold-based approach may be inappropriate in the setting of VA-ECMO due to differences in DO2 requirements between patients based on their etiology, disease severity, and ECMO modality. In addition, large variations in DO2 can be observed in the same patient and between ECMO settings. Therefore, a more individualized strategy guided by a DO2 surrogate, ScVO2, may be more appropriate in this population. This ScVO2 approach has recently been shown to be associated with reduced PRBCs in two randomized controlled trials in cardiac surgery patients.
The objective of this multicenter randomized controlled trial is to compare two red cell transfusion strategies in patients receiving extracorporeal veno-arterial membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock.
An individualized transfusion strategy based on ScVO2 level is compared with a conventional strategy based on a predefined hemoglobin threshold. The primary endpoint is red blood cell consumption, the secondary endpoints are subgroup analysis, mortality, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patient will recieve PRBCs transfusion only in case of ScVO2 level<65% after assessment of patient for optimisation of SaO2 targeting 100%, volume status, ECMO flow (increase to 20% in relevant), pain, anxiety and fever (body temperature >38°3).
In both groups transfusion may be performed in case massive bleeding according to local protocols, STEMI, Hyperlactatemia >4 that can be related to oxygen demand and supply DO2/VO2 ratio impairement, in all groups, transfusion should be performed in case of hemolobin level <7g/dL or worsening of neurological condition (Increase in Neurological SOFA component of 1 and more) related to DO2/VO2 impairement.
Other names: ScVO2 assesment to guide transfusion
Time frame: From randomisation until VA-ECMO weanning assessed up to 28 days
Total number of PRBCs transfused during support adjusted for VA- ECMO duration
Time frame: From randomisation until VA-ECMO weanning assessed up to 28 days
Total number of PRBCs transfused during support adjusted for VA- ECMO duration in patients that underwent cardiac surgery
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
Total number of PRBCs transfused during the 28-day following cannulation
Time frame: From randomisation until VA-ECMO weanning assessed up to 28 days
daily hemoglobin levels
Time frame: From randomisation until VA-ECMO weanning assessed up to 28 days
daily ScVO2 levels
Time frame: From randomisation until VA-ECMO weanning assessed up to 28 days
daily vasoactive index score levels
Time frame: From randomisation until VA-ECMO weanning assessed up to 28 days
All cause mortality before ECMO weaning
Time frame: 90 days from cannulation
All cause mortality from cannulation untill 90 days
Time frame: From randomisation until VA-ECMO weanning assessed up to 28 days
Proportion of patients that according to each reason for removal ( Recovery, heart transplantation, Left ventricle or biventricle assist device or death under support)
Time frame: 28 days from cannulation
Duration of mechnanical ventilation from cannulation untill 28 days
Time frame: 28 days from cannulation
Number of patient that underwent a renal replacement therapy and duration of renal replacement therapy from cannulation untill 28 days
Time frame: 28 days from cannulation
Duration of vasoactive drug support from cannulation untill 28 days
Time frame: 28 days from cannulation
Length of stay from cannulation censored at 90 day
Time frame: 28 and 90 days from cannulation
Proportion of HLA immunosensitisation occuring after cannulation
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
Transfusion related acute lung injury, hemolytic anemia, irregular antibodies
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
Sepsis is defined according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
Acute kidney injury is define according to KDIGO classification
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
Liver failure is defined as Hepatic component of SOFA score, Transaminasis Levels
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
Ischemic stroke is defined as clinical symptoms confirmed by aCT Scan of MRI imaging
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
According to the Universal definition of myocardial infarction, ESC guidelines
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
Dignose by the attending physician based on (Dyspnae, Thoracic X-rays), bowel ischemia ( Abdominal CT or endoscopy proven)
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
Anaphylaxis defined according to Ring and Messer Classification
Time frame: From randomisation until 28 days
Proven by Abdominal CT or endoscopy
Time frame: 28 days, 90 days and 5 years from randomisation
Actual costs at 28 and 90 days and modelisation for 5 years
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University Hospital, Lille
Other
Comparison of an Individualized Transfusion Strategy to a Conventional Strategy in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Veno-arterial ECMO for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: a Randomized Controlled Trial - ICONE
Acronym: ICONE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06862700
Cardiogenic Shock, Cardiovascular Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05527717
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Cardiogenic Shock
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07580781
Agnosia, Analgesia
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05106491
Cardiogenic Shock, Cardiovascular Diseases
Buchholz, Germany
View Trial Details