Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlyia, 35511, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06200077
This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of different staged ridge-splitting techniques for management of severely resorbed lower jaws in the posterior region. The study is designed as a clinical trial, so that three different interventions would be compared for a conclusion highlighting the relative best of them.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Mansurah, Dakahlyia, 35511, Egypt
In the context of the care of severely resorbed lower jaws in the posterior region, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of several stepwise ridge-splitting procedures. The study is supposed to be a clinical trial, with the purpose of comparing three distinct therapies in order to get a result that highlights which of them is the most effective in comparison to the others.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Unlike the conventional ridge-splitting where bone grafting is done in the same visit after ridge splitting, modified ridge splitting involves splitting the ridge only at the first visit, then bone grafting is done either alone afterwards in the second visit (Modified 3-Staged Ridge-Splitting Group) and dental implants will be placed in the third visit, or, as in the Modified 2-Staged Ridge-Splitting Group, bone grafting and dental implants placement will be done in the second visit.
Time frame: immediately after implant placement, immediately after implant loading and six months after implant loading
Radiographically via Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), the width of the alveolar bone was measured horizontally from the buccal to lingual cortex below the crest of the alveolar bone from 3 levels at 1 mm, 3 mm and 6 mm on three cross-sections by the CBCT software (OnDemand, Cybermed Inc, Korea).
Time frame: immediately after implant placement, immediately after implant loading and six months after implant loading
Smartpeg was installed in the dental implant fixture. From both buccal and lingual directions, an analyzer probe was located closer to the Smartpeg, and the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were obtained from the Osstell Monitor
Mansoura University
Other
Clinical Outcomes of Different Staged Ridge-Splitting Techniques Using Piezo-Electric Surgery in Atrophic Posterior Mandible
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06265467
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Maxillary Sinus
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06206577
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06177899
Alveolar Bone Loss, Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03468998
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details