Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01828775

Palliative Care Intervention in Improving Quality of Life, Psychological Distress, and Communication in Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Treatment

This pilot randomized clinical trial studies palliative care intervention in improving quality of life, psychological distress, and communication in patients with solid tumors receiving treatment on phase I trials. Cancer patients experience many symptoms related to treatment and the cancer itself that can be distressing and impact quality of life. Palliative care focuses on managing these symptoms and may help patients with solid tumors live more comfortably.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Test the effects of a palliative care intervention (PCI) on patients' quality of life (QOL), psychological distress and satisfaction with communication, comparing the experimental versus control groups.

II. Test the effects of a PCI on patients' symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities, comparing the experimental versus control groups.

III. Test the effects of a PCI on patients' hospital and palliative care resource utilization and clinical trial retention rates, comparing the experimental versus control groups.

IV. Test the effects of the timing of PCI initiation (early versus delayed) on patient outcomes, comparing the experimental versus control groups.

V. Describe patients' satisfaction with the PCI.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive part I of the PCI comprising quantitative surveys, comprehensive palliative care assessment by the Research Nurses, and goals of care discussions beginning prior to administration of the first dose of phase I treatment. Patients then receive part II of the PCI comprising recommendations from the interdisciplinary team, patient educational sessions, and supportive care referrals following the first dose of phase I treatment and is completed within one month of the first treatment.

ARM II: Patients receive usual care until 12 weeks post-treatment initiation. Patients then receive both part I and II of the PCI.

After completion of study, patients are followed up for 5 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with solid tumors who are eligible for participation in Phase I clinical trials of investigational cancer therapies
  • Patients who have signed an informed consent for participation in Phase I clinical trials
  • Able to read or understand English-this is included because the intervention and study materials (including outcome measures) are only in English
  • Ability to read and/or understand the study protocol requirements, and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with hematologic (as a population distinct from solid tumors and different trials) cancers.

Treatment and study plan

Palliative Care

Other

Receive early PCI

quality-of-life assessment

Procedure

Ancillary studies

Other names: quality of life assessment

Survey Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in overall QOL scores, assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spirituality (FACIT-Sp)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

    To control for inflation of experimentwise error caused by analyzing four different QOL subscales, alpha will be set to .01. A 2x2 multiply repeated measures ANCOVA (in which the within groups variables are QOL subscale scores at 4 and 12 weeks, the between groups measure is treatment group (control vs. PCI), and the covariate is baseline QOL) might be employed if the correlation between the four FACT-G subscale scores are high enough to warrant such an analysis. The overall QOL score derived from the FACT-G will be tested individually using alpha=.05.

    If subscale correlations are not high, outcome will be analyzed using four 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVAs in which the within groups variable is each QOL subscale, the between groups measure is group (PCI vs. control), and the covariate is the appropriate baseline QOL subscale (Physical well-being, emotional well-being, social well-being, and functional well-being).

  2. Change in psychological distress, assessed using the Psychological Distress Thermometer

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

    Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in psychological distress (Psychological Distress Thermometer scores), at 4 and 12-week between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline psychological distress.

  3. Satisfaction with communication, measured by the Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care (FAMCARE)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in satisfaction (Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care scores), at 4 and 12-week between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline satisfaction.

  4. Patients' symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities (using Psychological Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO - CTCAE) scores), at 4 and 12-week between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline symptom intensity and symptom interference.

  5. Total numbers of supportive care referrals (social work, dietitian, chaplaincy, psychologist/psychiatrist)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Contingency table analysis and the chi square statistic will be used to examine the association between group and referral to various support services. In addition, total number of referrals will be counted and an independent student's t-test will be used to test for significant differences in number of total referrals between groups.

  6. Total number of unscheduled outpatient encounters and inpatient admissions

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Total number of encounters and admissions will be counted and an independent student's t-test for each variable will be used to test for significant differences in number of total encounters and number of unscheduled admissions between groups.

  7. Total number of hospice referrals

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Contingency table analysis with the chi square statistic to examine the association between group and hospice referral.

  8. Retention on the Phase I trial

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Contingency table analysis with the chi square statistic to examine the association between group and Phase I trial retention.

  9. Patient satisfaction with the PCI

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Descriptive statistics and comparisons between the two groups will be conducted for overall satisfaction with intervention content and timing of the intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in overall QOL scores, assessed by FACT-G and FACIT-Sp

    Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

    To control for inflation of experimentwise error caused by analyzing four different QOL subscales, alpha will be set to .01. A 2x2 multiply repeated measures ANCOVA (in which the within groups variables are QOL subscale scores at 4 weeks, the between groups measure is treatment group (control vs. PCI), and the covariate is baseline QOL) might be employed if the correlation between the four FACT-G subscale scores are high enough to warrant such an analysis. The overall QOL score derived from the FACT-G will be tested individually using alpha=.05.

    If subscale correlations are not high, outcome will be analyzed using four 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVAs in which the within groups variable is each QOL subscale, the between groups measure is group (PCI vs. control), and the covariate is the appropriate baseline QOL subscale (Physical well-being, emotional well-being, social well-being, and functional well-being).

  2. Change in overall QOL scores, assessed by FACT-G and FACIT-Sp

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    To control for inflation of experimentwise error caused by analyzing four different QOL subscales, alpha will be set to .01. A 2x2 multiply repeated measures ANCOVA (in which the within groups variables are QOL subscale scores at 24 weeks, the between groups measure is treatment group (control vs. PCI), and the covariate is baseline QOL) might be employed if the correlation between the four FACT-G subscale scores are high enough to warrant such an analysis. The overall QOL score derived from the FACT-G will be tested individually using alpha=.05.

    If subscale correlations are not high, outcome will be analyzed using four 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVAs in which the within groups variable is each QOL subscale, the between groups measure is group (PCI vs. control), and the covariate is the appropriate baseline QOL subscale (Physical well-being, emotional well-being, social well-being, and functional well-being).

  3. Change in psychological distress, assessed using the Psychological Distress Thermometer

    Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

    Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in psychological distress (Psychological Distress Thermometer scores), at 4 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline psychological distress.

  4. Change in psychological distress, assessed using the Psychological Distress Thermometer

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in psychological distress (Psychological Distress Thermometer scores), at 24 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline psychological distress.

  5. Satisfaction with communication, measured by FAMCARE

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in satisfaction (Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care scores), at 4 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline satisfaction.

  6. Satisfaction with communication, measured by FAMCARE

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in satisfaction (Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care scores), up to 24 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline satisfaction.

  7. Patients' symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities (Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO - CTCAE) scores), up to 24 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline satisfaction.

  8. Total numbers of supportive care referrals (social work, dietitian, chaplaincy, psychologist/psychiatrist)

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    Contingency table analysis and the chi square statistic will be used to examine the association between group and referral to various support services for up to 24 weeks. In addition, total number of referrals will be counted and an independent student's t-test will be used to test for significant differences in number of total referrals between groups.

  9. Total number of unscheduled outpatient encounters and inpatient admissions

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    Total number of encounters and admissions will be counted and an independent student's t-test for each variable will be used to test for significant differences in number of total encounters and number of unscheduled admissions between groups for up to 24 weeks.

  10. Total number of hospice referrals

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    Contingency table analysis with the chi square statistic to examine the association between group and hospice referral for up to 24 weeks.

  11. Retention on the Phase I trial

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    Contingency table analysis with the chi square statistic to examine the association between group and Phase I trial retention for up to 24 weeks.

  12. Patient satisfaction with the PCI

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    Descriptive statistics and comparisons between the two groups will be conducted for overall satisfaction with intervention content and timing of the intervention for up to 24 weeks.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

City of Hope Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

Integration of Palliative Care for Cancer Patients on Phase I Trials

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Apr 11, 2013
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.