Dubai Dental Hospital
Dubai, 505055, United Arab Emirates
NCT Number: NCT06034067
A total of 34 participants, who require replacement of an anterior or posterior single tooth with dental implant, will be randomly allocated to two equal sized groups. In the control group, the osteotomy site preparation will be prepared by using conventional surgical drills, while the test group site preparation will involve the use of Densah™ Burs (Versah Co., LLC., USA) as per the osseodensification protocol. In addition to evaluating implant stability, the trial will also report on implant and patient outcomes at various time points.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dubai, 505055, United Arab Emirates
Osseodensification technique has demonstrated increased primary stability and increased bone mineral density around the osteotomy site. The implants placed into osseous densification osteotomies have shown significant increase in insertion and removal torque values. This technique also burnishes bone along the inner layer of the osteotomy site and create a condensed layer of autografted bone along the periphery and apex of the implant. This would, in turn, increase the bone-implant contact enhancing the insertion torque values, and thus, primary implant stability. This new technique has not only shown increased primary implant stability when compared with conventional drilling, but also, shown to have similar clinical safety to conventional methods of osteotomy site preparation. Although osseodensification has been reported to enhance the clinical outcomes of implants by increasing primary stability, its long-term effects on implant stability measurements and implant survival rates are still not clear. The purpose of the present randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the stability of implants placed in sites prepared with either conventional drilling or osseodensification and report on implant and patient outcomes at various time points.
Objectives:
The aims of the randomized controlled trial are:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The implant site will be prepared by raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Implant osteotomy will be prepared by using osseodensification technique using Versah burs and a dental implant will be placed. The flaps will then be replaced and sutured with 4/0 polyglycolic acid interrupted and mattress sutures.
Other names: Densah® burs, Versah co., USA
The implant site will be prepared by raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Implant osteotomy will be prepared by using either conventional surgical drills provided by Straumann implant systems and a dental implant will be placed. The flaps will then be replaced and sutured with 4/0 polyglycolic acid interrupted and mattress sutures.
Other names: Straumann® Twist Drills, Straumann, Switzerland
Time frame: Upto 36 months
Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) will be used to determine stability (the level of osseointegration) in dental implants. The stability will be presented as an implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. The measurements will be recorded at time of implant placement, delivery of implant restoration (baseline), one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years using resonance frequency analysis.
Time frame: Upto 36 months
Implant failure rate will be assessed clinically after one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years.
Time frame: Upto 36 months
Changes in peri-implant marginal bone level will be assessed at implant placement, delivery of implant restoration (baseline), one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years using standardized peri-apical radiograph. The changes in peri-implant marginal bone levels will be recorded in millimeters
Time frame: Upto 36 months
Descriptive evaluation of biological and technical complications will be recorded during the follow-up period
Time frame: Upto 10 days
Patient postoperative experience will be assessed using visual analogue scale during the first week following implant placement; the scale consists of a 10cm line, with end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('unbearable/worst pain'). The participant will be asked to place a mark on he line indicating the level of pain that he/she experienced.
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
Other
Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling for Implant Site Preparation: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04017026
Dental Implant Failed, Implant Complication
Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06099834
Dental Implant Failed, Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06313229
Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Diseases
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06288919
Dental Implant Failed, Mouth Diseases
Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
View Trial Details