Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06034067

Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling for Implant Site Preparation

A total of 34 participants, who require replacement of an anterior or posterior single tooth with dental implant, will be randomly allocated to two equal sized groups. In the control group, the osteotomy site preparation will be prepared by using conventional surgical drills, while the test group site preparation will involve the use of Densah™ Burs (Versah Co., LLC., USA) as per the osseodensification protocol. In addition to evaluating implant stability, the trial will also report on implant and patient outcomes at various time points.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dubai Dental Hospital

Dubai, 505055, United Arab Emirates

About this study

Osseodensification technique has demonstrated increased primary stability and increased bone mineral density around the osteotomy site. The implants placed into osseous densification osteotomies have shown significant increase in insertion and removal torque values. This technique also burnishes bone along the inner layer of the osteotomy site and create a condensed layer of autografted bone along the periphery and apex of the implant. This would, in turn, increase the bone-implant contact enhancing the insertion torque values, and thus, primary implant stability. This new technique has not only shown increased primary implant stability when compared with conventional drilling, but also, shown to have similar clinical safety to conventional methods of osteotomy site preparation. Although osseodensification has been reported to enhance the clinical outcomes of implants by increasing primary stability, its long-term effects on implant stability measurements and implant survival rates are still not clear. The purpose of the present randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the stability of implants placed in sites prepared with either conventional drilling or osseodensification and report on implant and patient outcomes at various time points.

Objectives:

The aims of the randomized controlled trial are:

  • To evaluate implant stability as measured by implant stability quotient (ISQ).
  • To evaluate the clinical, radiographic outcomes and implant survival rates.
  • To evaluate the need for additional bone augmentation at the time of implant placement.
  • To evaluate changes in peri-implant marginal bone level.
  • To evaluate bone quality as estimated by clinicians during osteotomy preparation.
  • To evaluate biological and technical complications during the follow-up period.
  • To evaluate patient reported outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 or over.
  • Require replacement of an anterior or posterior single tooth with dental implant.
  • Controlled oral hygiene (full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores ≤ 25% at baseline).
  • Good compliance and commitment to attend follow-up review appointments.
  • Willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Localized / generalized periodontitis.
  • Bone metabolic disease and/or taking medications that affect bone metabolism.
  • Long term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications.
  • History of malignancy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Severe bruxism or parafunctional habits.
  • Participants, who have controlled medical condition or smokers, will not be excluded in this study

Treatment and study plan

Osseodensification osteotomy preparation

Procedure

The implant site will be prepared by raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Implant osteotomy will be prepared by using osseodensification technique using Versah burs and a dental implant will be placed. The flaps will then be replaced and sutured with 4/0 polyglycolic acid interrupted and mattress sutures.

Other names: Densah® burs, Versah co., USA

Standardized osteotomy preparation

Procedure

The implant site will be prepared by raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Implant osteotomy will be prepared by using either conventional surgical drills provided by Straumann implant systems and a dental implant will be placed. The flaps will then be replaced and sutured with 4/0 polyglycolic acid interrupted and mattress sutures.

Other names: Straumann® Twist Drills, Straumann, Switzerland

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Implant stability quotient (ISQ values) using resonance frequency analysis

    Time frame: Upto 36 months

    Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) will be used to determine stability (the level of osseointegration) in dental implants. The stability will be presented as an implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. The measurements will be recorded at time of implant placement, delivery of implant restoration (baseline), one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years using resonance frequency analysis.

  2. Implant failure rate

    Time frame: Upto 36 months

    Implant failure rate will be assessed clinically after one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in peri-implant marginal bone level (in mm)

    Time frame: Upto 36 months

    Changes in peri-implant marginal bone level will be assessed at implant placement, delivery of implant restoration (baseline), one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years using standardized peri-apical radiograph. The changes in peri-implant marginal bone levels will be recorded in millimeters

  2. Descriptive evaluation of biological and technical complications associated with dental implant restorations

    Time frame: Upto 36 months

    Descriptive evaluation of biological and technical complications will be recorded during the follow-up period

  3. Patient postoperative experience ( visual analogue scale )

    Time frame: Upto 10 days

    Patient postoperative experience will be assessed using visual analogue scale during the first week following implant placement; the scale consists of a 10cm line, with end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('unbearable/worst pain'). The participant will be asked to place a mark on he line indicating the level of pain that he/she experienced.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling for Implant Site Preparation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.